|
||||||||
Dr Who Ratings Thread (Merged) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#3801 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,647
|
In regards to iplayer, there has been a bit of a natural evolution over the years, at one point the figures were just the raw data - total views, not unique views, so if the same person watched it twice it's still counted in the total views, what they can do now is reflect unique views, which is obviously more meaningful when considering the total reach. The initial data released is still the total views, with the refined figure coming later.
Once it's being measured by BARB through their sampling system we will be able to get this information more efficiently. Unfortunetly the whole Smith era is going to under represent the final episode ratings officially by quite a significant number ( too a lesser extent seris 4 and the specials year as well). Even taking the figure mentioned for Rings you can see a loss of getting on for one million viewers. It's good that the technology is finally cattching up with how people watch TV now, but it' does feel BARB have dragged their heels a bit incorporating it . |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#3802 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 523
|
Quote:
But these aren't the overnights but the final viewing figures. I keep getting told more people are watching on catch-up now, so surely any clashes would be neutralised by iPlayer viewing figures?
In the main the timeshifters and iPlayer users either choose that option by default, or come from the part of the overnight audience that are generally keen enough on watching that they'll catch-up if watching on the night isn't an option. The less interested and more casual viewers aren't going to use catch-up services by definition. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3803 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: St Ives, Cambs
Posts: 374
|
Quote:
Unfortunetly the whole Smith era is going to under represent the final episode ratings officially by quite a significant number ( too a lesser extent seris 4 and the specials year as well). Even taking the figure mentioned for Rings you can see a loss of getting on for one million viewers.
It's good that the technology is finally cattching up with how people watch TV now, but it' does feel BARB have dragged their heels a bit incorporating it . VCR ownership was pretty widespread by the time the BBC started scheduling Sylvester McCoy's three seasons against Coronation Street. We know Doctor Who got hit hard by them doing so, but what we have no idea about is just how many people were having to timeshift each episode to accomodate the hardened CS viewers in the house. It's worth remembering that back in those days Coronation Street and EastEnders were huge. If they got an audience now like they were getting then it'd be front page of the tabloids. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3804 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Quote:
VCR ownership was pretty widespread by the time the BBC started scheduling Sylvester McCoy's three seasons against Coronation Street. We know Doctor Who got hit hard by them doing so, but what we have no idea about is just how many people were having to timeshift each episode to accomodate the hardened CS viewers in the house.
I know Tivo/Sky+/Virgin Plus etc are much easier ways to record TV than video recording (what with series-link facilities etc). But people do seem to forget how much we actually used video recorders back in the 80s and 90s. We used them all the time. Doubtless, we were more choosy due to video tapes only being 3 or 4 hours long, but then we also had fewer clashes due to there only being 4 channels. In McCoy's era (1987-89) far fewer households had more than one TV set and (as JNT used to argue) in split households, Coronation Street (with its 18m-20m viewers) would have been watched live and Who recorded. And that 'catch up' audience was not captured meaning McCoy was saddled with figures of 4m-5m when the truth is he probably got much more than that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3805 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
Yet, you will still get many Moffat detractors who insist he's lost the show millions (there was one who claimed Smith's era was 4 million down on Tennant's) of viewers. I gave up trying to educate them with the facts such as the above a long time ago.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3806 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,239
|
Quote:
Here's the full era ratings!
David Tennant - 8.36 million Matt Smith - 7.98 million Christopher Eccleston - 7.95 million I suspect that David's higher specials count (with the high ratings they had amassed) widened the margin between him and Matt more than it would have been if their episode count was equal. |
|
|
|
|
#3807 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tycoch
Posts: 2,413
|
Quote:
Thanks Benjamin so close there!!! It also shows how strong Series 1 was with the inflated Rose figures.
http://doctorwho.slug-web.co.uk/?q=&o=7&s=1&g=1 - excluding the specials (Christmas and David Tenants 4 specials), These are the averages for the "normal" series. Code:
Total Viewers no of Ep Ave Viewers (m) Eccleston 103.33 13 7.95 Tennant 303.05 39 7.77 Smith 295.16 39 7.57 SeriesTot Viewers no of Ep Ave Viewers (m) 1 103.33 13 7.95 2 100.30 13 7.72 3 98.14 13 7.55 4 104.61 13 8.05 5 100.08 13 7.70 6 98.20 13 7.55 7 96.88 13 7.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3808 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 4,094
|
Quote:
Using the Figures From Slug Web ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3809 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
|
Nice one Jules...and indeed The Slug. Had wondered about the ratings if you take Specials out of the equation. Pretty darn consistent for a programme that's been on the air for nine C21 calendar years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3810 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
|
Out of curiosity, what would Series 4 have been without the Journey's End's 3m bump?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3811 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,647
|
Quote:
VCR ownership was pretty widespread by the time the BBC started scheduling Sylvester McCoy's three seasons against Coronation Street. We know Doctor Who got hit hard by them doing so, but what we have no idea about is just how many people were having to timeshift each episode to accomodate the hardened CS viewers in the house.
According to the BARB site they started including VCR recordings in December 1984 so not sure thats the case actually. Quote:
Yeah, but he hasn't exactly gained millions either...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3812 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Quote:
Out of curiosity, what would Series 4 have been without the Journey's End's 3m bump?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3813 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Quote:
According to the BARB site they started including VCR recordings in December 1984 so not sure thats the case actually.
Worldwide? He absolutely has. Basically maintaining the audience inherited in the UK is in itself a huge achievement. In terms of world-wide viewership, Moffat has at best maintained the viewership he inherited from RTD. I've seen forum member suggest there are more viewers in the US than ever before but looking at the ratings it seems the show on BBC America is getting about the same as season 1 was getting on Sci-Fi. And Classic Who got more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3814 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,647
|
Quote:
Out of curiosity, what would Series 4 have been without the Journey's End's 3m bump?
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...&postcount=475 Series 3 vs series 4 final ratings(excluding Christmas specials): ***** series 3 series 4 episode 1 - 8.71 :9.14 episode 2 - 7.23 : 9.04 episode 3 - 8.41 : 7.5 episode 4 - 6.69 :7.06 episode 5 - 6.96 : 6.53 episode 6 - 7.19 :7.33 episode 7 - 7.41 : 8.41 episode 8 - 7.74: 6.27 episode 9 - 7.21 :7.84 episode 10 - 6.62:8.05 episode 11 - 7.84: 8.09 episode 12 - 7.31: 8.78 Average ----- 7.44:7.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3815 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
|
Quote:
Its a bump of 1.79m at the end of the season. But then you could argue that The Eleventh Hour gave season 5 a 1.68m bump at the start.
![]() Probably asking for the Moon on a Stick here, but is there any data to give an idea how many people watched TDOTD worldwide? Or do we just stick to "a lot"? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3816 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tycoch
Posts: 2,413
|
Firstly I am thankful to the Slug for his kind words and also the effort he puts into such a fantastic website, which makes further analysis so much easier.
Onto the Series 4 question, the last numbers of episodes of series 4 were doing very well in any case. as can be seen below, however if I was to cap the last 2 episodes at 8.1m The Series Average drops from 8.05m to 7.80m. Code:
Actual Capped Partners in Crime 9.14 05/04/2008 1 9.14 The Fires of Pompeii 9.04 12/04/2008 2 9.04 Planet of the Ood 7.50 19/04/2008 3 7.50 The Sontaran Strategem 7.06 26/04/2008 4 7.06 The Poison Sky 6.53 03/05/2008 5 6.53 The Doctor's Daughter 7.33 10/05/2008 6 7.33 The Unicorn and the Wasp 8.41 17/05/2008 7 8.41 Silence in the Library 6.27 31/05/2008 8 6.27 Forest Of The Dead 7.84 07/06/2008 9 7.84 Midnight 8.05 14/06/2008 10 8.05 Turn Left 8.09 21/06/2008 11 8.09 The Stolen Earth 8.78 28/06/2008 12 8.10 Journey's End 10.57 05/07/2008 13 8.10 Average 8.05 7.80 , slightly different way of doing it, very similar results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3817 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,647
|
Quote:
John Nathan-Turner made it very clear that video recorded stats were never added to the ratings for the McCoy years. I would have though he would have known.
![]() Quote:
In terms of world-wide viewership, Moffat has at best maintained the viewership he inherited from RTD. I've seen forum member suggest there are more viewers in the US than ever before but looking at the ratings it seems the show on BBC America is getting about the same as season 1 was getting on Sci-Fi. And Classic Who got more.
In terms of the US, it did well on SCi-Fi when it was shown close-ish to the time it was broadcast to the UK but once they started showing it ages afterwards it went down a huge amount and didn't recover until the last few years. Plus it has a much higher media profile in the US than it ever has in the past. Worldwide, it has absolutely expanded a lot in recent years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3818 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Quote:
And 'Rose' for Series 1' etc
![]() Probably asking for the Moon on a Stick here, but is there any data to give an idea how many people watched TDOTD worldwide? Or do we just stick to "a lot"? No idea. I'm sure someone clever like Slug will have it though! I hope I don't look like I'm nit-picking, but RTD absolutely deserved that amazing rating for Journey's End. It was the climax to a superb season and got an amazing AI too. I think taking Christmas specials and other specials out of the average ratings is fine but not specific episodes just because they have a particularly high rating. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3819 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,647
|
Quote:
And 'Rose' for Series 1' etc
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3820 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
|
[quote=Mulett;70645087]No idea. I'm sure someone clever like Slug will have it though!
I hope I don't look like I'm nit-picking, but RTD absolutely deserved that amazing rating for Journey's End. It was the climax to a superb season and got an amazing AI too. I think taking Christmas specials and other specials out of the average ratings is fine but not specific episodes just because they have a particularly high rating.[/QUOTE Generally really enjoyed series 4 with Tennant and Tate (Donna's my favourite companion period) so no argument with that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3821 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tycoch
Posts: 2,413
|
If we look at specials averages
Code:
Total (m) Epi Ave (m) Smith 56.69 5 11.34 Tennant 89.25 8 11.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3822 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
|
Quote:
Its a bump of 1.79m at the end of season 4. But then you could argue that The Eleventh Hour gave season 5 a 1.68m bump at the start.
![]() But my unconcerned stance is maintained on both overnights and finals. Doctor Who's ratings are consistently superb - and series averages can have peaks and troughs on single episodes alone, regardless of their quality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3823 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Quote:
I was working with overnights for some reason - too much discussion on that side of things
![]() But my unconcerned stance is maintained on both overnights and finals. Doctor Who's ratings are consistently superb - and series averages can have peaks and troughs on single episodes alone, regardless of their quality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3824 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
|
Quote:
I think AIs remain the biggest mystery for me!
![]() Quote:
1 David Tennant 86.3 (47)
2 Matt Smith 85.9 (44) 3 Christopher Eccleston 82.2 (13) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3825 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Gallifrey
Posts: 1,934
|
Quote:
In what way?
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:52.






