|
||||||||
Dr Who Ratings Thread (Merged) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1076 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oop North, England, UK
Posts: 7,084
|
Cheers Muttley for that, I suppose a final one parter would be a bit odd if we're sticking to 13 shows. As to the football well this has to be the first World Cup where I cannot muster up any enthusiasm, hope I am proven wrong for having none though!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#1077 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peri's Cleavage
Posts: 14,690
|
Quote:
there was a rumour going around that the two parters might be over a weekend this series, but I think that was just because some people seemed to think (wrongly) that it wouldn't be possible to avoid DW going up against Englands world cup matches otherwise. Mind you given how miserably the team have played the lat couple of games god knows why anyone thinks they have a shot at progressing to the latter stages.
I tend to think the 13 week format is liable to be pretty set in stone from a production perspective though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1078 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,640
|
Quote:
Cheers Muttley for that, I suppose a final one parter would be a bit odd if we're sticking to 13 shows. As to the football well this has to be the first World Cup where I cannot muster up any enthusiasm, hope I am proven wrong for having none though!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1079 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,640
|
Quote:
Does anyone have an idea what time the episode on June 12th is on? That's the evening of the first England Match, though as you say Muttley, if today was anything to go by, I shouldn't really be bothered......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1080 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peri's Cleavage
Posts: 14,690
|
Quote:
no time has been announced yet, I'd guess a 6.15pm start though, as the ITV coverage starts at 7pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1081 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dagenham, Essex.
Posts: 940
|
Quote:
Thanks! Don't think the BBC would be stupid enough to clash Who and an England Football match. There again.....
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1082 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,640
|
Quote:
Don't the games kick off at 7:30pm?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1083 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peri's Cleavage
Posts: 14,690
|
Quote:
Don't the games kick off at 7:30pm?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1084 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 418
|
Quote:
It got more viewers at 7pm this week but a lower share. It also got lower viewing figures than every other episode this series bar last weeks in a later slot. These factors do disprove the notion that being on at 7pm brings in millions of viewers that wouldn't have otherwise watched it.
Last weeks ratings were not the normal overnight ratings the show gets, they were down due to the extremely hot weather. Your basic point of comparison is highly flawed, you need to look at the average overnight ratings this year, not cherry pick the atypical result. The problem is Weather/Opposition/2 Parter/School Holidays/Promotions and a few others will also affect the Overnights - so it is not easy as to just compare one week starting at 6.15 and the next at 7.00 and thinking it would be a Million higher - it's far more involved that that - which I'm sure you appreciate but just choose to ignore when making your sweeping statement that a 7pm makes no difference at all. I think nothing has been proven regarding the 7pm slot. It is still open to debate. But it seems obvious more people have bums on seats as the evening draws on. I think to dismiss is in the one sentence you did claiming "It is all over" is rather flawed in itself! |
|
|
|
|
|
#1085 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,640
|
Quote:
At 7pm last night there were around 20m viewers watching TV. At 6pm there were only 16m.!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1086 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 418
|
Quote:
which is why the show would have had a larger share in the earlier slot but the same audience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1087 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The TARDIS
Posts: 11,931
|
Quote:
At 7pm last night there were around 20m viewers watching TV. At 6pm there were only 16m. Based on DW's share its around 1m viewers - which is always the figure even RTD said the show dropped by being on 45 minutes earlier than 7pm. You said in one of your earlier posts "Some people say it would get Millions more....." - I don't know anyone who has said that, but around 1,000,000 is about right per hour it starts earlier than 7.
Actually even RTD admitted to being wrong when PIC got 9 million viewers at a 6.20pm slot.... And you only have to trawl through this thread to see people saying that it would do better at a 7pm slot.... Quote:
The problem is Weather/Opposition/2 Parter/School Holidays/Promotions and a few others will also affect the Overnights - so it is not easy as to just compare one week starting at 6.15 and the next at 7.00 and thinking it would be a Million higher - it's far more involved that that - which I'm sure you appreciate but just choose to ignore when making your sweeping statement that a 7pm makes no difference at all.
Those other things will effect overnights, but the point of the argument is that it doesn't mean an automatic 7pm slot would give it the extra viewers, which is what some were saying....threads have been started on this subjected...so the only thing Muttley can say with the evidence provided by the brilliant ratings that the earlier slots got and the 7pm slot got, is by saying that it doesn't make a difference...Quote:
I think nothing has been proven regarding the 7pm slot. It is still open to debate. But it seems obvious more people have bums on seats as the evening draws on.
You may have extra bums on seat but that doesn't mean all of them want to watch it....for example Gareth from the Guardian was dismissing the ratings of 9 million that Waters of Mars got on the Simon Mayo show because the share was 33%....there were roughly 30 million people watching TV on that day and that hour...yet only Nine million watched it....so having more bums on seat doesn't automatically mean that more will watch it...as was the case last night....so the ones who were going to watch it still did, whether it be 7pm or 6pm...and that is the point of the whole 7pm debate.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#1088 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,640
|
AI of 85 for Cold Blood. Another nice AI for this series....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1089 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The TARDIS
Posts: 11,931
|
Quote:
AI of 85 for Cold Blood. Another nice AI for this series....
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1090 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,640
|
Quote:
Excellent
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1091 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Victorian London
Posts: 1,130
|
Final figures for The Hungry Earth - 6.49m
6.01m BBC 1 0.48m BBC HD Third highest rating for the eighth episode of a series |
|
|
|
|
|
#1092 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NW London
Posts: 19,904
|
And a gnat's doodah under a 2m timeshift!
Is that a record? K |
|
|
|
|
|
#1093 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain with Annie
Posts: 7,954
|
Blimey, a third or so of the total viewing done after the actual initial airing! Amazing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1094 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Quote:
Blimey, a third or so of the total viewing done after the actual initial airing! Amazing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1095 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dagenham, Essex.
Posts: 940
|
Quote:
And a gnat's doodah under a 2m timeshift!
Is that a record? K The Eleventh hour got a timeshift of just over 2 million i believe. Anyway that's a fantastic rating considering the fuss made over the overnight figure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1096 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 712
|
Already Answered Question
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1097 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,232
|
6.49m is pretty good for The Hungry Earth taking into account the very low overnights - a bit more than I was expecting actually.
With part 2s overnights being up 1m or so on part 1 then we should be back around 7.5m+ I do wonder though whether Moffatt is going to be able to hype the finale like RTD always did - whether you liked it or not he always seemed able to bring in the ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1098 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The TARDIS
Posts: 11,931
|
Quote:
Final figures for The Hungry Earth - 6.49m
6.01m BBC 1 0.48m BBC HD Third highest rating for the eighth episode of a series ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1099 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dagenham, Essex.
Posts: 940
|
Quote:
6.49m is pretty good for The Hungry Earth taking into account the very low overnights - a bit more than I was expecting actually.
With part 2s overnights being up 1m or so on part 1 then we should be back around 7.5m+ I do wonder though whether Moffatt is going to be able to hype the finale like RTD always did - whether you liked it or not he always seemed able to bring in the ratings. RTD was great at Hyping the finales.... He used the 'Throw the kitchen sink at it' technique. ![]() Series 1.The Parting of the Ways. Daleks... Lots of Daleks! Plus a regeneration!(Rating 6.9miliion) just a little bit higher than 'The Hungry Earth' Series 2. Doomsday Lots of Daleks. Lots of Cybermen... Plus the first time we saw the last of Rose! (Rating 8.2million) The Eleventh Hour had an overnight of 8 million.... RTD was no where to be seen! Series 3. Last of the Timelords. The return of the Master and Captin Jack...(Rating 8.6 million) Again episodes this series have been getting over 8 million. Series 4. Journey's End. I think everybody who was ever in RTD's Nu-Who turned up here.... Captain Jack , Rose, Sarah Jane... Plus the return of Davros. And the earth being towed back to it's rightful place in the solar system... (Rating 10.6 million)Now that's a great rating... ![]() RTD was great at getting fantastic ratings, but it's a myth that Moffat isn't... People are seeing the low overnights and thinking that this series is doing badly... It isn't, it's well up there is the RTD era'. It's still up there with series 1 average i believe? |
|
|
|
|
|
#1100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The TARDIS
Posts: 11,931
|
Quote:
RTD was great at Hyping the finales....
He used the 'Throw the kitchen sink at it' technique. ![]() Series 1.The Parting of the Ways. Daleks... Lots of Daleks! Plus a regeneration!(Rating 6.9miliion) just a little bit higher than 'The Hungry Earth' Series 2. Doomsday Lots of Daleks. Lots of Cybermen... Plus the first time we saw the last of Rose! (Rating 8.2million) The Eleventh Hour had an overnight of 8 million.... RTD was no where to be seen! Series 3. Last of the Timelords. The return of the Master and Captin Jack...(Rating 8.6 million) Again episodes this series have been getting over 8 million. Series 4. Journey's End. I think everybody who was ever in RTD's Nu-Who turned up here.... Captain Jack , Rose, Sarah Jane... Plus the return of Davros. And the earth being towed back to it's rightful place in the solar system... (Rating 10.6 million)Now that's a great rating... ![]() RTD was great at getting fantastic ratings, but it's a myth that Moffat isn't... People are seeing the low overnights and thinking that this series is doing badly... It isn't, it's well up there is the RTD era'. It's still up there with series 1 average i believe? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:12.




