• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
The Apprentice UK Series 4 - Episode 3 - BBC1 (9pm-10pm)
<<
<
30 of 30
>>
>
brangdon
12-04-2008
Originally Posted by lumpbottom:
“She was right.
The boys took in far more money, partly because they didn't b***s up the lunchtime opening.”

They took £50 more, which is only 6%. It's not a lot, given that the girls didn't, in fact, do lunch. Presumably the girls took more money in the evening.

Quote:
“If they'd have decided on menus, and bought the food first they'd have walked it.”

Well, no. They over-spent on marketing, too. In fact if they'd got all the food for free they'd still have lost, so it hardly mattered where they bought it from.

(In the boardroom someone says the boys marketing spend was £272, which is roughly half of their £543 total spend, and they lost by over £300. So with free food they'd have lost by £30.)

Quote:
“That mistake was down to Kevin. He jumped in wanting to be head chef, then didn't like what it entailed and didn't do the job.”

I wouldn't say he jumped in. He and Simon both offered to be cooks, which wouldn't have been a big deal as it was just cooking. Simon said Kevin should be head chef - I suspect he was trying to be nice and just make Kevin the more senior of those two, rather than trying to stitch Kevin up. Kevin agreed, and then Ian laid the heavy trip on him about being responsible for the menu, hence ingredients list, hence pricing, which was clearly not what he thought he'd agreed to do. He probably should have backed down, but by then it was too late. After that I thought Kevin did the best he could in a role he wasn't really suited for.

Ian should have been more careful about how he assigned the role, given it's importance. (Sara recognised the importance and took it on herself, which was risky but arguably paid off.)
neomilan
12-04-2008
we can't analyse the show that deeply becuase we don't see everything... half of it is cut and a lot is cut on purpose for entertainment
so lets just presume sir alan knew what he was doing and there were reasons why the boys and girls teams did as they did, even though we can see the obvious things to have done
Stingray4real
15-04-2008
The Apprentice Week One

The Apprentice Star Sara for her outstanding leadership as project manager and not taking any crap from whinging Serth African Claire

The Apprentice Muppet Kevin''Daffyd' Shaw for roverspending on food and making a complete cock up with the pub mealEspecially about sending half a pizza.Can yopu see Pizza Hut doing that to their customers?

The Apprentice Villain Ian 'Stringed Up Loser' Sringer for telling porkies to Sir Alan and passing the buck on to Simon and Daffyd

Worst Decision Making Daffyd the Head Chef instead of Simon Smith,Graduated from the Tim Gray of Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares School Of Culinary Arts

Sir Alan's One Liners None but only from me and the biggest Loser got fired by leaving his wife and kids to risk going on to The Apprentice and good riddance.
Scots_Dragon
15-04-2008
Originally Posted by Stingray4real:
“The Apprentice Week One

The Apprentice Star Sara for her outstanding leadership as project manager and not taking any crap from whinging Serth African Claire”

I was confused by what you were trying to say, but then I realised it wasn't me that was confused; you were the one confused. I put this down to the fact that you got your weeks mixed up, as none of that happened in Week One. Which irc, was when the winning Project Manager was Claire strangely enough.
Stingray4real
16-04-2008
Sorry I meant to put Week Three
Scots_Dragon
16-04-2008
Originally Posted by Stingray4real:
“Sorry I meant to put Week Three”

No problems, and sorry I didn't mean for it to sound harsh or criticizing. I must remember the smilies more, makes me seem like a hard nosed grumpy git otherwise
Esqualita
16-04-2008
Originally Posted by Scots_Dragon:
“No problems, and sorry I didn't mean for it to sound harsh or criticizing. I must remember the smilies more, makes me seem like a hard nosed grumpy git otherwise ”

Talking of Smilies- why are these
called smilies?
Shouldn't they be called moanies or grumpies???
Slow Alex
16-04-2008
Simon may be an Essex chav (with nice eyes), but he is shaping up to be a good team player.
Mr_Predictor
16-04-2008
Originally Posted by Esqualita:
“Talking of Smilies- why are these
called smilies?
Shouldn't they be called moanies or grumpies???”

Best point ever made on DS lol!
Digital Sid
16-04-2008
Originally Posted by Slow Alex:
“Simon may be an Essex chav (with nice eyes), but he is shaping up to be a good team player.”

If he's a chav in your eyes then you can't know what a chav is. He's just working class, that doesn't make him chavvy.
footygirl
16-04-2008
Jenny C is a chav- she's all mouth as she showed a few weeks ago
TheFirstCut
16-04-2008
Originally Posted by Esqualita:
“Talking of Smilies- why are these
called smilies?
Shouldn't they be called moanies or grumpies???”

...and sarcasticies
<<
<
30 of 30
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map