• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Britain's Got Talent
Should Acts Be Allowed Back...??
Sid_1979
26-04-2008
I've never been keen on acts being permitted a second chance on shows like this.

Yes the lad who returned after failure last year danced outstandingly well, but he had his chance and now it's time to give someobedy else theirs.

I think he's got it in the bag. If he doesn't make the final then his reappearence will mean nothing.

What are your thoughts?
ForestChav
26-04-2008
Well, who decides in the end? I didn't see last years, but if he's willing to learn and do it again the year after then he should be able to.
Sid_1979
26-04-2008
Originally Posted by ForestChav:
“Well, who decides in the end? I didn't see last years, but if he's willing to learn and do it again the year after then he should be able to.”

I'm not sure of the rules. I'm a newbie to the show!

But all the rejected acts could go away and improve their "talent" and be invited back next year, but I think everyone should only be given one shot so that others can have an opportunity to shine.
ForestChav
26-04-2008
Originally Posted by Sid_1979:
“I'm not sure of the rules. I'm a newbie to the show!

But all the rejected acts could go away and improve their "talent" and be invited back next year, but I think everyone should only be given one shot so that others can have an opportunity to shine.”

No, AIUI they have to go through the same procedure as everyone else.

If they're not good enough, again, then they won't get through, end of.
Sid_1979
26-04-2008
Originally Posted by ForestChav:
“No, AIUI they have to go through the same procedure as everyone else.

If they're not good enough, again, then they won't get through, end of.”

Is there an viewer's vote?
Playboy Nolan
26-04-2008
I think you are trying to bring in fairness into a show that doesn't give a damn.

They are making a TV show and not interested in fairness at all. - If they want me on next weeks show that has already been recorded, then they would do that and edit me in.

It's a shame but people are lead to believe that all these shows have a heart and are trying to be fair, above board: They are not! Not in any way! They are making a TV programme and that's it!

The majority of the viewing audience are NOT people like us, they are people who go gar-gar whenever they see a kid, fall for the sod story and like seeing people having another go.

We on the other hand can see how unfair it is and that someone else could get air time that the returnee has taken.

But they don't care - to them we are wrong as we are talking about fairness and not talking about making a TV show.
Holly Oaks
27-04-2008
I like the fact he came back; it shows how determined he is to succeed. He has certainly improved since last year, and he, to me, had just as much right to be there as anyone else. He was one the very few tonight I actually enjoyed watching.
trec123
27-04-2008
I thought George showed outstanding determination in coming back to try again to be honest, and if went through the same audition procedure, then good luck to him.
They all seemed quite moved by his will to succeed, and I was glad he got another shot at it, to be honest - It was surely fairer then giving the other young lad a chance to reappear in the same series with a completely different act?
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map