I did
. It was the fact that it was so different to our one...
Gameplaying:
US: I liked that it was a game show and the contestants all played the game.
UK: Yet over here if they play the game they are accused of having a 'gameplan' called a 'fake' and get evicted.
The Winner:
US: They all had a chance of winning due to it only being the housemates who vote.
UK: Most of them dont care about winning anymore, especially the female HMs as they know the little teenyboppers who spend all their credit voting wont allow them to win.
Evictions:
US: The evictee would walk right out of the house to a calming interview with the imparsial, professional Julie.
UK: The evictee nearly has a panic attack before getting thrown to the lions and facing a (sometimes) grilling from the biased, unprofessional Davina.
Audience:
US: There was an audience for the finale and they applauded all the houseguests, even people like Chelsea, Matt & Natalie, who came across as disliked, but the audience obviously just thanked them for giving them such great entertainment.
UK: A crowd which is mostly 90% of women-hating chavs and wannabes who failed at BB auditions turn up just to boo people who have provided us with great entertainment and of course nowadays HMs are getting booed before they even get out of the car on launch night
and of course theres the horrible chanting of "Get (name) out"
Presenters:
US: Julie never lets anyone know who her favourites are and treats all HMs the same,
like any professional TV presenter would.
UK: Davina just gets worse and worse everytime I see her, I like her but she is so biased nowadays, when she done that awful On The Couch show during BB8:yawn: everyone could see what a phony she was as she was so sweet to all the shrinks on Sunday and nasty to HMs on Friday.
. Also I cant stand the way she keeps reminding us about how EXCITING!!!!! every lame task and twist is.
Tasks:
US: The HMs really put their heart and soul into the tasks as they know their is some good prizes at the end of them. Majority of the tasks are also physical and involve the HMs competing against eachother.
UK: Most HMs couldnt care less about tasks anymore - I can hardly even remember any tasks from BB8 - the only prize at the end is the shopping list where they always end up arguing about how many tomatoes to order or something:yawn:. Just dressing them up in silly costumes doesnt make it exciting either.
Nominations:
US: Only one HM is allowed to choose who faces eviction which is fair as that is the set rule for the series, also they can all discuss who they are going to vote for which makes it more interesting.
UK: If someone discusses nominations they are penalised with a punishment to suit Big Brother, and what exactly is the point of not being able to discuss nominations as its not an essential part of BB anymore, normal nominations only happen every few weeks nowadays as they are too busy changing the rules at every minute
.
What do you think?
Should BB UK take a leaf out of the BB US book?
Or do you prefer the UK version the way it is?
And do you prefer the US version or the UK version.
. It was the fact that it was so different to our one...Gameplaying:
US: I liked that it was a game show and the contestants all played the game.
UK: Yet over here if they play the game they are accused of having a 'gameplan' called a 'fake' and get evicted.
The Winner:
US: They all had a chance of winning due to it only being the housemates who vote.
UK: Most of them dont care about winning anymore, especially the female HMs as they know the little teenyboppers who spend all their credit voting wont allow them to win.
Evictions:
US: The evictee would walk right out of the house to a calming interview with the imparsial, professional Julie.
UK: The evictee nearly has a panic attack before getting thrown to the lions and facing a (sometimes) grilling from the biased, unprofessional Davina.
Audience:
US: There was an audience for the finale and they applauded all the houseguests, even people like Chelsea, Matt & Natalie, who came across as disliked, but the audience obviously just thanked them for giving them such great entertainment.
UK: A crowd which is mostly 90% of women-hating chavs and wannabes who failed at BB auditions turn up just to boo people who have provided us with great entertainment and of course nowadays HMs are getting booed before they even get out of the car on launch night
and of course theres the horrible chanting of "Get (name) out"
Presenters:
US: Julie never lets anyone know who her favourites are and treats all HMs the same,
like any professional TV presenter would.UK: Davina just gets worse and worse everytime I see her, I like her but she is so biased nowadays, when she done that awful On The Couch show during BB8:yawn: everyone could see what a phony she was as she was so sweet to all the shrinks on Sunday and nasty to HMs on Friday.
. Also I cant stand the way she keeps reminding us about how EXCITING!!!!! every lame task and twist is.Tasks:
US: The HMs really put their heart and soul into the tasks as they know their is some good prizes at the end of them. Majority of the tasks are also physical and involve the HMs competing against eachother.
UK: Most HMs couldnt care less about tasks anymore - I can hardly even remember any tasks from BB8 - the only prize at the end is the shopping list where they always end up arguing about how many tomatoes to order or something:yawn:. Just dressing them up in silly costumes doesnt make it exciting either.
Nominations:
US: Only one HM is allowed to choose who faces eviction which is fair as that is the set rule for the series, also they can all discuss who they are going to vote for which makes it more interesting.
UK: If someone discusses nominations they are penalised with a punishment to suit Big Brother, and what exactly is the point of not being able to discuss nominations as its not an essential part of BB anymore, normal nominations only happen every few weeks nowadays as they are too busy changing the rules at every minute
.What do you think?

Should BB UK take a leaf out of the BB US book?
Or do you prefer the UK version the way it is?
And do you prefer the US version or the UK version.




I think it's important to have a human presenter who does have their own opinions. Davina usually has the same opinions as the public as so she is only representing the public's feelings in the interview. If she was completely unopinionated, the public would complain that her interviews are boring and she doesn't seem human like they do with Julie. I don't think BB US would be the same if they replaced Julie though so it's great that they keep her.