• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Claire is the best Apprentice candidate since Ruth Badger!
<<
<
7 of 7
>>
>
**Nora**
27-05-2008
Originally Posted by brangdon:
“She's not deliberately undermining or sabotaging. She's not tactful with her advice, but I think she'd have won more if her project leaders had listened to her. Generally what she says makes sense: had Sara listened about the English food she might not have had to cancel lunch; had Simon listened about the production issues they might have got some photos printed and sold; had Kevin listened about who should do the pitch they might have won the card task; had Raef listened about getting shots of the box they might have won the advert task.

Her teams have lost despite her rather than because of her. When she is the leader herself, she wins.”

I don't think kevin would have won because the idea was flawed. I don't think that Raef would have won the task if they included the shots. They all missed the point of the tissues being antibacterial even Claire. She was good at the pitch but her performance was poor in the last task being the most experienced in marketing out f the seven candidates. I don't think that Sara would have listened to Claire even if she knew that Claire was right. Sara said in post-firing interviews that she is a strict Muslim. She would not have been able to cook some of the elements of the english breakfast.

However, I agree with your main point. Claire is often right. Less mistakes would have been made, had PMs listened to her advice.
Say_It_Loud
28-05-2008
Originally Posted by hia06sw:
“I don't think she can win. I just get the impression she's been in too much trouble with SAS so far to go on and win it. Just instinct that really so no good evidence, but I just don't see it.”

Do you think Michael is in the same position - too many previous run-ins with SAS?
neomilan
28-05-2008
maybe he should hire ruth and forget the rest
and also hire christina from last year
and then give tre a job

and then think about the shit candidates this year
robbies_gal
28-05-2008
i think claires got bettre but shes to smug always thinks shes right and shes not and the praising from nick is sickening now

ruth is a million times better than her in business
Sara Webb
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by Dave Javue:
“I'm from Wakey, and I don't sound like Claire, like Chantelle, like Helene or like Jane MacDonald. But her accent is noticeably a Wakefield accent, tinged with a Cockney twang from living in London for several years.”

Um... Chantelle is from Essex. If we are talking about the same Chantelle, of course.
Ethereal
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by Sara Webb:
“Um... Chantelle is from Essex. If we are talking about the same Chantelle, of course.”

Think he means Chanelle, not Chantelle.
Say_It_Loud
05-06-2008
It just occurred to me, Miriam Staley was a decent candidate, I wonder if she could have been a finalist on a different Apprentice series?

Claire has now reached the level achieved by Ruth, perhaps she can go a step further and win.
<<
<
7 of 7
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map