Would you rather...

Be fired from the apprentice as a villian but everyone know you are a talented individual.. (like katie)

OR

Be fired for being "out of your depth" but have an image of being a "good guy" (like simon)

I'd rather be fired for being out of my depth but seen as a good person.

To be honest, I'd rather be a good person but penniliess as opposed to a mean person who's successful.

(not that I'm suggesting that all good guys end up poor, or that all bad guys end up super rich)

Integrity of person before all. being a bitch is a short-term lifestyle choice. Money cannot bring you personal fulfilment unless you are terribly shallow, and therefore intrinsically unhappy.

Er, Katie wasn't/isn't talented...AT ALL.

I'd rather be fired 'with regret' but yet FEARED by all, and get booed on You're fired.

Disagree, I didn't like the girl at all but there is no denying her talent. She was the definition of manipulation and persuasiveness, and had a very confident and controlling persona.

Put it this way, had she not bowed out in the final, she would have won the series despite only intending to ruin everyone else after the dismissal of her sausage frying boyfriend.

If that's not ruthlessness, cunning, clever etc, I don't know what is.

Oh, i'd rather be a famous villain then a forgotten hero in the Apprentice. I know Katie, I can't even remember the name of the lad who got sacked from the portrait task this year.

Second option. Definitely.

No, she wouldn't. She was good entertainment, I grant you, but didn't display a lot by way of business skills. Most (Siralan included) had her number.

Only a certain type of man (i.e. not very fussy) would be taken in by her so-called charms.

IMO.