From today's Telegraph:
Andrew Lloyd Webber's hunt is sabotaged
"It used to be that when our nation voted, and those votes were counted, we could rely on the great psephologist Robert Mckenzie and his swingometer, to interpret the results. We live in jittery times.
People are disillusioned and unsure, not of whom they support, but whether their support even matters any more. So, in the great professor's absence, please allow me to put these recent upsets in their political context.
Niamh's shock exit from the BBC's I'd Do Anything has left many reeling. The girl is an obvious star - great singer, great dancer, great beauty - but she never stood a chance.
These television talent shows ceased to be television talent shows back in the days of Will Young versus Gareth Gates. What they have become are contests of regional political motivation and muscle. And Andrew Lloyd Webber should be starting to worry.
Last weekend, there were five contenders for the West End role of Nancy in Oliver! Consider the geography. Using my giant map here in the studio, I point to Blackpool - home of Jodie; the Isle of Man - home of Samantha; and then Ireland, which produced Niamh, Rachel and Jessie.
Up in Blackpool, greater Blackpool and the whole of that strongly politicised area, they have gone Jodie mad, despite the fact that she is too old, too heavy and not a natural on the dancefloor. The Isle of Man can't believe it finally matters; although a small constituency, it has become highly activated with its finger permanently on the redial button. And the Irish vote? Fractured; fatally crippled by a three-way split.
In the absence of some good old-fashioned rigging, the producers of Oliver! can now only hope that viewers will choose their favourite Nancy purely on talent. But there is an uncomfortable historical footnote. Reality TV shows have a habit of mirroring life.
Remember The X Factor 2007, back in the happier, early days of Gordon Brown's premiership? Then, Scotland swept something called Leon to victory. He was a bitter disappointment - dour, prone to tears and when he got the Number 1 slot, he didn't seem to know what to do with it. No one would want to see a disaster like that again."
How far do you think regional voting has a part to play? Do you really think voting in IDA and similar is this political? On what basis have you chosen your favourite Nancy: talent/ region/ popularity/ personality or a combination of them all? I find this whole question very interesting as I'm rooting for the Nancy who I think can play the part the best, rather than where she's from or what her personality is like. Am I in the minority on that?
Just interested to know what you guys think.
Andrew Lloyd Webber's hunt is sabotaged
"It used to be that when our nation voted, and those votes were counted, we could rely on the great psephologist Robert Mckenzie and his swingometer, to interpret the results. We live in jittery times.
People are disillusioned and unsure, not of whom they support, but whether their support even matters any more. So, in the great professor's absence, please allow me to put these recent upsets in their political context.
Niamh's shock exit from the BBC's I'd Do Anything has left many reeling. The girl is an obvious star - great singer, great dancer, great beauty - but she never stood a chance.
These television talent shows ceased to be television talent shows back in the days of Will Young versus Gareth Gates. What they have become are contests of regional political motivation and muscle. And Andrew Lloyd Webber should be starting to worry.
Last weekend, there were five contenders for the West End role of Nancy in Oliver! Consider the geography. Using my giant map here in the studio, I point to Blackpool - home of Jodie; the Isle of Man - home of Samantha; and then Ireland, which produced Niamh, Rachel and Jessie.
Up in Blackpool, greater Blackpool and the whole of that strongly politicised area, they have gone Jodie mad, despite the fact that she is too old, too heavy and not a natural on the dancefloor. The Isle of Man can't believe it finally matters; although a small constituency, it has become highly activated with its finger permanently on the redial button. And the Irish vote? Fractured; fatally crippled by a three-way split.
In the absence of some good old-fashioned rigging, the producers of Oliver! can now only hope that viewers will choose their favourite Nancy purely on talent. But there is an uncomfortable historical footnote. Reality TV shows have a habit of mirroring life.
Remember The X Factor 2007, back in the happier, early days of Gordon Brown's premiership? Then, Scotland swept something called Leon to victory. He was a bitter disappointment - dour, prone to tears and when he got the Number 1 slot, he didn't seem to know what to do with it. No one would want to see a disaster like that again."
How far do you think regional voting has a part to play? Do you really think voting in IDA and similar is this political? On what basis have you chosen your favourite Nancy: talent/ region/ popularity/ personality or a combination of them all? I find this whole question very interesting as I'm rooting for the Nancy who I think can play the part the best, rather than where she's from or what her personality is like. Am I in the minority on that?
Just interested to know what you guys think.





