|
||||||||
Raef *fired*!!! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Another poor decision by Sir Alan,
As Raef pointed out, he's rarely been on the losing team or in the boardroom so he should have been given the benefit of the doubt. Michael has been a loser upteen times and usually plays a part in his team's downfall. He's had more than enough chances and should have been sent packing. |
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,464
|
Quote:
Because he wanted to get rid of raef and if Michael had been PM he would have had to fire him. I think SAS is biased against posh
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 27
|
This show is a good advertisemnet for the product 'lying' when it shows that this is how you succeed in the boardroom
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
|
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
Gutted! |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North Hampshire
Posts: 5,362
|
After this fiasco, I don't think I'm going to bother watching any more. This is the first series I've seen and I've been enjoying it up till now, even though sirralan's fired some very undeserving people. (Shazia, Sara, Simon !) when clearly, others were more to blame on the weeks they performed their task.
Hugh Fearnley Wittingstall's on next week, I'd sooner watch him, much better for my high blood pressure. ! How on earth he could keep that greasy little slimeball Michael instead of Raef astounds me, and I've no desire to see his horrible face any more. Knowing how curmudgeonly the old s*d is, he'll go and keep the little f**wit. Maybe he's really his son. ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,647
|
Raef's exit interview is up: http://www.bbc.co.uk/apprentice/news...e/cid/158.html Some really good stuff: Quote:
You defended Sara very gallantly when she attacked... I don't like seeing anyone - no matter who they are - made to feel bullied. It was like hounds savaging a hare that they'd hunted. They looked for signs of weakness and they pounced. I don't stand for that, in business or in life. Quote:
Should Michael have been fired instead?
In short, yes. Michael has proven that he can be quite a ruthless individual. He has resorted to techniques and tactics in the past that I would not have used. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:52.


