Another poor decision by Sir Alan,

As Raef pointed out, he's rarely been on the losing team or in the boardroom so he should have been given the benefit of the doubt.

Michael has been a loser upteen times and usually plays a part in his team's downfall. He's had more than enough chances and should have been sent packing.

Just what I said on another thread wait and see it will be Lucinda next week

This show is a good advertisemnet for the product 'lying' when it shows that this is how you succeed in the boardroom

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

Gutted!

After this fiasco, I don't think I'm going to bother watching any more. This is the first series I've seen and I've been enjoying it up till now, even though sirralan's fired some very undeserving people. (Shazia, Sara, Simon !) when clearly, others were more to blame on the weeks they performed their task.

Hugh Fearnley Wittingstall's on next week, I'd sooner watch him, much better for my high blood pressure. !

How on earth he could keep that greasy little slimeball Michael instead of Raef astounds me, and I've no desire to see his horrible face any more. Knowing how curmudgeonly the old s*d is, he'll go and keep the little f**wit. Maybe he's really his son. !

Raef's exit interview is up:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/apprentice/news...e/cid/158.html

Some really good stuff: