• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Sorry but i still don't think Lucinda is very good.
<<
<
6 of 15
>>
>
Katenutzs
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by Love Bear:
“ I'll agree to differ!

She was right about the garish box and pictures though you do have a point re the gay tissues!!!

As a female myself, I wouldn't want to be on a team with those two, I can tell you!”


That is what discussion and debate are all about. Everyone is entitled to their preception of what they see and sometimes it is fun to debate different angles. It would be a dull world if we all liked the same things
williams96
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“Well they wouldnt have won with gay rights tissues or tissue boxes with someone in an armchair sipping a cuppa, so it was just as well Lee & Alex got on with the task and let Lucinda throw her toys out of her pram. I think they were amazing for keeping their cool and not letting her self centred whiny personality get to them

Lee is a pussy cat, never heard any of the others say anything against him other than the evening he said what he tought of Sara. However loads of the others commented on how difficult Lucinda is and how she manulipates things to make her look hard done by.

They won because Lee & Alex read the remit and followed it.”

It was a concept not the literal idea of having a picture of a cup and an armchair.
Cadence
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by The Rhydler:
“They were blatantly trying to bully her out of opinion, accusing her of volounteering for the location job when she clearly did not. Lee tried to shout at her in the cab and she wouldn't stand for it.

And the glut of funny faces the pair made behind her back, they showed her no respect when in fact, everything she said was right. The box looked shit, you don't have dead flowers in an advert.

Of course, Sir Al is willing to overlook this stuff just to eject the posh bloke.”

I don't think SAS overlooked anything just to eject the posh bloke. Last year he employed the posh bloke! SAS clearly stated that his opinion was also the opinion of the three advertising executives.
Katenutzs
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by williams96:
“It was a concept not the literal idea of having a picture of a cup and an armchair.”

Some people make me laugh ... they can see the concept if its to do with Lucinda but not is it has to do with anyone else

But fair dues your entitled to your opinion ... I myself backed her until a few weeks ago, just the gloss wore off and I saw a different side to her. You got to agree she has some batty ideas bless her
vidalia
22-05-2008
Threads like this in which it is evident that people get really involved analysing the minutiae of everything that happens in each episode makes me realise why I love The Apprentice so much and why it is such good television.
Katenutzs
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by vidalia:
“Threads like this in which it is evident that people get really involved analysing the minutiae of everything that happens in each episode makes me realise why I love The Apprentice so much and why it is such good television.”

I agree with you, sometimes you find yourself getting passionate about something and just can't help yourself saying exactly what you feel. It is good to debate and I honestly try and see the others point of view but sometimes it is difficult, lol
williams96
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“Some people make me laugh ... they can see the concept if its to do with Lucinda but not is it has to do with anyone else

But fair dues your entitled to your opinion ... I myself backed her until a few weeks ago, just the gloss wore off and I saw a different side to her. You got to agree she has some batty ideas bless her ”

I don't see where I have failed to see someone else's concept unless you are referring to someone else seeing as I've only just recently started posting about this series in detail?
rosieeee
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“I felt Lucinda behaved very badly last night. She showed the side of herself that the other candidates have accused her of last night. She was obstructive, negative and acted like a spoilt child. She whinged throughout the show. What really put me off was her daring to wag her fingers at fellow contestants and go 'naughty naughty naughty' ... so patronising ... if one og the guys had behaved liked that they would have been slaughtered on here”

I know what you are saying - but she was right about most of the things she said.
Cadence
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by sweetcorn:
“I quite like Lucinda, but not sure how she would actually be to work with though. I doubt she will win, Siralan doesn't do posh...”


What about Simon Ambrose, last year's winner? Am I missing something?
peely
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“Well they wouldnt have won with gay rights tissues or tissue boxes with someone in an armchair sipping a cuppa, so it was just as well Lee & Alex got on with the task and let Lucinda throw her toys out of her pram. I think they were amazing for keeping their cool and not letting her self centred whiny personality get to them

Lee is a pussy cat, never heard any of the others say anything against him other than the evening he said what he tought of Sara. However loads of the others commented on how difficult Lucinda is and how she manulipates things to make her look hard done by.

They won because Lee & Alex read the remit and followed it.”

Wot, you mean like Lee's suggestion of a greeting card for aliens?? Perhaps some of her ideas were extreme, but Lee's and Alex's ideas were narrow to the point of cringeworthy!!

Lucinda seemed to me to be trying to get them to think outside the norm. I do think she nagged them too much, particularly after they'd already got things agreed.
Cadence
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by InigoMontoya:
“Can you refresh my memory on this?

What I recall is seeing her go on and on about the box after it was too late to do anything about it. Do you have any insight into what the point of doing that was because I'm coming up short in working out how that was helping the team.”

That's how I saw it too - and that also seems to be how the advertising bloke on 'You're Fired' saw it. I could understand Alex and Lee's reactions. In the circumstances it seemed to be demoralising the rest of the team rather than a positive contribution. I'm glad she picked up later.
Forever Awkward
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by The Rhydler:
“#she had to put up with a lot of nasty snide behaviour from Lee and Alex tonight.”

Snide remarks? You mean treating someone who has the attitude of a spoilt child in the only way that they will understand.

Originally Posted by InigoMontoya:
“Can you refresh my memory on this?

What I recall is seeing her go on and on about the box after it was too late to do anything about it. Do you have any insight into what the point of doing that was because I'm coming up short in working out how that was helping the team.”

I couldn't agree more.

Originally Posted by I love Ellie:
“Give her one thing.

She looked fantastic in that short sparkly dress!”

She did indeed.

She is a pretty girl. She's just a little bit eccentric in her dress sense but there's nothing wrong with that. It makes her different.

Originally Posted by funkycub:
“I think (by the previews) things go tits up for the Alex / Lee / Lucinda team next week. It doesn't look good.”

The previews only hinted that things were getting to Lucinda.

Could she be the candidate that walks out?

Originally Posted by beamsley:
“I think she's got a big too big for her boots and showed herself up a bit last night. Having said that - someone had to step in coz Alex couldn't manage his way out of a paper bag.”

Alex did a good job last night. It was Lucinda's "stepping in" that bu$$ered up Lee's presentation.

Apart from that, what else did she contribute? She just whinged about anything and everything once it was too late.

Originally Posted by Number Three™:
“She looked sad when Claire and Michael returned to the house without Raef. ”

She will have been even sadder if one of them told her the reason for Raef's sacking. If Raef is full of hot air, Lucinda is positively flying above the clouds on it. She must have realised that it's only a matter of time before she gets found out.

Originally Posted by Vivid:
“There is a remarkable amount of delusional tripe being dispensed on this thread.

Some people seem to think Lucinda is a nice person because she has been the victim of some pretty unpleasant and personal abuse. I have some news for you: being a victim doesn't necessarily make you a nice person or competent at business. Lucinda may have shown concern for other victims of abuse, but this behaviour was essentially just a mutual comforting by the incompetents.

The only reason that, until recently, we have not seen the conceited, self-indulgent and self-serving side of Lucinda is because she has been obliged through her incompetence and low self-esteem to keep a low profile and accommodate others. She had to be more assertive as PM, but the tasks on both occasions ( the ice cream selling and the wedding dress promotion ) required little project management and few decisions and so her being inept, ineffectual and inoffensive were not problems.

The confidence that she gained through winning the wedding task and receiving an endorsement from her team has, as usual with these sorts of people, revealed the true monster that lurks within; she is a petty-minded, inept, confused incompetent who can't prioritise issues or tasks.

She is only at the start of the path to being a competent manager and this was graphically demonstrated in this episode. With her newly gained confidence she decided that a self-serving approach was desirable; she carped at every opportunity, whether on petty or substantive issues, and criticised all team decisions with a destructive vigour so she could later disown them in the boardroom. This negative and immature strategy, which almost amounted to sabotage, was the same strategy that Claire adopted weeks ago and seems to have abandoned after suffering the consequences. Lucinda may in many weeks time develop further and catch up with the rest of them but I doubt it, she is trailing and destined to fail.

An interesting question for Lucinda lovers, who usually dislike Alex, emerges from her recent behaviour: what would you think if Alex had been as disruptive as Lucinda in his tasks ? Had he behaved like Lucinda there would have been a baying for his blood. Alex had the good sense to go along with decisions he couldn't change and make the best of bad jobs, Lucinda couldn't see the bigger picture and indulged every negative and selfish whim she had at the expense of her team.”

I couldn't have put it better.

Originally Posted by The Rhydler:
“They were blatantly trying to bully her out of opinion, accusing her of volounteering for the location job when she clearly did not. Lee tried to shout at her in the cab and she wouldn't stand for it.

And the glut of funny faces the pair made behind her back, they showed her no respect when in fact, everything she said was right. The box looked shit, you don't have dead flowers in an advert.

Of course, Sir Al is willing to overlook this stuff just to eject the posh bloke.”

With all due respect, that is a pile of tripe from the first letter to the last full stop.

Originally Posted by Esqualita:
“aka opinions. You need to tone down your vindictive manner. It stopped me reading the rest of the post, which I'm sure was actually thought-provoking.”

Yes, opinions. Perhaps you need to start reading those of other people instead of dismissing them out of hand because the first line hints at the poster disagreeing with you.

Originally Posted by The Rhydler:
“I noticed the dead flowers. I SAW THEM!”

Who cares? Were they advertising gardening products? It was supposed to be a natural shot. They took it in a field/park/lawn. Did you expect them to travel to RHS Wisley or Kew Gardens for one shot?

As for Lucinda's pathetic opinion that someone blowing their nose is off putting (wakey, wakey, woman ............... natural bodily functions ???), perhaps someone should tell that to companies like Kleenex whose adverts have revolved around people with runny and blocked noses for decades.

Originally Posted by Vivid:
“What people would have spotted and objected to was an ad for homosexual tissues, as per Lucinda's insane idea.”

A measure, if it were needed, of the cluelessness of the woman.

Originally Posted by 2LO:
“Had Clair and Helene had more input to the other team's TV ad they would almost certainly have won and it would have made clear Lucinda's frustration with having to deal with a pair of overgrown schooolboys.”

Brilliant. Absolutely poetic. A pair of overgrown schoolboys? Well, there is something that is beyond Lucinda as her mentality and attitude hasn't made it past nursery yet.


Originally Posted by The Swampster:
“The Atisho ad looked like a spoof of a 70s commercial. It aspired to Cillit Bang's sophistication.”

Does no one buy Cillit Bang because the ads are naff? No. They buy it because they know from the ads what it's for and what it does.


Originally Posted by Lemon Dracula:
“Interesting adverts: all the Lynx ones, the Guinness ones, the Cadbury's ones, the coca-cola ones etc etc. At least if they had gone with the homosexual angle, and that advert was shown on TV, it would get people talking. They'd notice the advert.”

It would put off as many people as it would encourage. Most people buy a product because they like it but many buy it because they want to be associated with it. That is the whole point of celebrity endorsement. Rightly or wrongly and whether you like it or not, a homosexual image would put off some customers, particularly male.

Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“Lucinda then needs to change her attitude because to me and an awful lot of other people who do not wear lucinda tinted glasses she was rude and obstructive last night, she appeared so negative in everthing she said unless she was been cajoled by the guys. I think they both deserve medals for not arguing back”

I think they both deserve medals for not throttling her.

Originally Posted by GratingCheese:
“Why would being positive about such an awful product be a good thing? I swear you're on another planet.”

You promote a product as if your life depended on its success, if that is what your job is. Do you honestly think all sales people love or even believe in everything they sell?

Originally Posted by GratingCheese:
“She was airing her opinion. She still got on with the job but she let them know what she thought. The decisions the "boss" made during this tasks were bad ones and could have lost them the task. If Renaissance had included more tissue references, Alpha would have been crushed.”

If, if, if.

The point is they didn't. The point is Renaissance got it wrong and Alpha got it closer to right - in spite of Lucidityless.


Originally Posted by Sid_1979:
“Alex is talentless and has been very lucky so far”

The lucky one went last night. I am not Raef's biggest fan but was sad to see him leave last night. It should have been Michael.

However, I had to agree with SAS that Raef had been lucky to not be in the Boardroom more than once before. Alex on the other hand has been unlucky to be on the losing team more times than have been down to him.


Originally Posted by williams96:
“Funny how things can be twisted.

She had to go on so much because she wasn't being listened to at all, as pointed out in the show afterwards she was correct in the things which she was saying. Last week Lucinda made a point to Lee and Lee just took it and that was that. Alex wouldn't do that. Alex said to camera that all he was doing was making her feel like she had 'some' control over something. He was just dismissing her and clearly, I feel, trying to put her in a position where if they lost he could easily try to get her fired. Hence why the moment they got into the boardroom, before they'd even announced the results she was turned on.

I've already pointed out in another thread that SAS said to Claire she hadn't made a big enough point about the advert and she should have drilled it home more and tried to save the task. Well Lucinda was doing that the whole task, because she could see where it was going wrong. They didn't do well, they were just lucky that the other team made such a fundamental error.

Had she not been negative she'd been accused of double standards and so many times in the boardroom it has come up that someone actually wasn't as persuasive towards something as they should have been e.g. with the wedding dresses.

As for Lucinda losing the icecream task, that was basically pure luck that Claire won. Lucinda's team had been better and much better organised. I also believe she's been on the winning team an awful lot compared to most of the candidates left.”

Yes, funny how things can be twisted indeed.

Lee and Alex "turned on" Lucinda in the Boardroom because she had done nothing but prepare to do that herself all day.

They were lucky that the other team made a fundamental error? Weren't the other team unaware and generally incompetent for making that error? The first rule of advertising is give people an idea of what you are actually advertising.

There is putting your case across and there is being negative and obstructive.

Yes, Lucinda has been on the winning team more often than not but, rather like Raef, more through luck than judgement.

Originally Posted by 2LO:
“This really is just your take on it, and you are in a minority.”

Who are you to tell anyone when they are in a minority? Have you interviewed everyone who watches the series?

If not, pray tell, what scientific study have you carried out to prove your theory?

Originally Posted by 2LO:
“If they had lost, and she had not made her position exteremely clear I can picture the scene in the boadroom:

Sugar: Lucinda, were you happy with the design of the box and the ad?
Lucinda: No.
Sugar: Did you make that clear to the others.
Lucinda: I did say that, yes.
Alex: Can I just say that Lucinda was completely happy with the box and the ad.

We've seen almost exactly that happen more than once.

We see someone express a serious doubt but one or more of the remainder of the team lie through their teeth and deny it.

Lucinda made damn sure that couldn't happen this time (although I'm not sure that was her motivation - I think she was just utterly frustrated by the abysmal job the other two had done and felt her input would have lead to a better effort. I'm sure it would).”

Maybe in light of the fact that they won, Margaret should have asked Lucinda or prompted SAS to ask Lucinda whether she was happy with the way things went. Let's see how honest she would have have been then?

Originally Posted by InigoMontoya:
“When, exactly, were Alex and Lee overbearing?”

In Lucinda's dreams.

Oh, sorry, did you not mean it like that?

Originally Posted by InigoMontoya:
“it was Lucinda's behaviour as a team member that was at issue.”

Was that pun intended?
Cadence
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“I felt Lucinda behaved very badly last night. She showed the side of herself that the other candidates have accused her of last night. She was obstructive, negative and acted like a spoilt child. She whinged throughout the show. What really put me off was her daring to wag her fingers at fellow contestants and go 'naughty naughty naughty' ... so patronising ... if one og the guys had behaved liked that they would have been slaughtered on here”

Very good observations. People seem to have forgotten that she refused to get out of bed for a meeting a few weeks back that the rest of her team attended.
williams96
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by Forever Awkward:
“Yes, funny how things can be twisted indeed.

Lee and Alex "turned on" Lucinda in the Boardroom because she had done nothing but prepare to do that herself all day.

They were lucky that the other team made a fundamental error? Weren't the other team unaware and generally incompetent for making that error? The first rule of advertising is give people an idea of what you are actually advertising.

There is putting your case across and there is being negative and obstructive.

Yes, Lucinda has been on the winning team more often than not but, rather like Raef, more through luck than judgement.”

Considering she was so ready she didn't really say anything did she? Plenty of opportunity to return fire but instead she defended herself in the boardroom without insulting others in retaliation (even though the truth was distorted to some degree in the allocation of roles).

Clearly she knew that by being vocal she had a fall back in the boardroom if needed, but if you read all my posts you will know I have said that and not denied that was part of the reasoning behind her bringing it up again. Added to the fact she was probably annoyed they had not communicated with her about the design which was something the project managers should have done more in this task. Most errors were done due to a lack of communication.

My comment regarding luck was the fact that they did so much wrong, the pitch, the design, the advert. Claire pointed out the error to the guys and it was left (foolishly). It wasn't as if they won by doing well.
LinkinFighter
22-05-2008
She is smokin hot
sparkie70
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by peely:
“Wot, you mean like Lee's suggestion of a greeting card for aliens?? Perhaps some of her ideas were extreme, but Lee's and Alex's ideas were narrow to the point of cringeworthy!!

Lucinda seemed to me to be trying to get them to think outside the norm. I do think she nagged them too much, particularly after they'd already got things agreed.”

I don't think Alex was a good PM but he did send the message across which was the main thing. I do not think Lucinda helped but in my option she did not try to be bad but put her views across. A good PM should take on their teams view. Maybe Alex & Lee would of listened to Claire had she been on the team.
Cadence
22-05-2008
Originally Posted by frost:
“What was wrong with her being negative though? She didnt like the design of the box, which was crap, and wasnt afraid to say so. Better to be that than be all "yeah, yeah it's great" during the task and then "I hated it" in the boardroom.”

Well in all fairness she didn't have to say she liked it if she didn't, just say what she would have done differently and move on, not go on about it to the length and with the stridency she appeared to in the programme. By doing so her contribution was destructive rather than constructive, demoralising rather than inspiring the team. Obviously the time to make such strong objections would have been at the decision stage but she wasn't party to that. Her choice therefore was to simply provide her feedback and move on with the task. Her role as a team member is to be constructive, not undermine the confidence of her fellow team members.
InigoMontoya
23-05-2008
Of it was Lucinda's behaviour as a team member that was at issue.

Originally Posted by Forever Awkward:
“Was that pun intended? ”

I do my best.
2LO
23-05-2008
Originally Posted by Forever Awkward:
“Who are you to tell anyone when they are in a minority?”

Someone who can count.

Quote:
“Maybe in light of the fact that they won, Margaret should have asked Lucinda or prompted SAS to ask Lucinda whether she was happy with the way things went. Let's see how honest she would have have been then?”

Indeed.

I'm not promoting the view that Lucinda is perfect. Merely that it seems to me that she may have had some justification for her behaviour in this episode.

If we were able to see more footage I might well change my mind. Or have my view confirmed.
Dollystanford
23-05-2008
I like Lucinda but I don't think next week's task will suit her at all
vidalia
23-05-2008
Originally Posted by Dollystanford:
“I like Lucinda but I don't think next week's task will suit her at all”

Lucinda: "I don't do cars. I don't even know where the tissue holder is."
Lee: "Go and find out what colours cars girlies like while me and Alex go play with the vroom-vrooms. This is what I'm talking about."
Alex: [Chewing mouth thoughtfully] Yeah.
ArtyAttack
23-05-2008
Nick Hewer sums up Lucinda perfectly in the preview clip for next weeks task on the Official site.
williams96
23-05-2008
Originally Posted by Cadence:
“Well in all fairness she didn't have to say she liked it if she didn't, just say what she would have done differently and move on, not go on about it to the length and with the stridency she appeared to in the programme. By doing so her contribution was destructive rather than constructive, demoralising rather than inspiring the team. Obviously the time to make such strong objections would have been at the decision stage but she wasn't party to that. Her choice therefore was to simply provide her feedback and move on with the task. Her role as a team member is to be constructive, not undermine the confidence of her fellow team members.”

It's an error both teams made - they didn't communicate well enough. That allowed Raef and Michael to go into their own little world unchecked, while Alex and Lee decided so much without contacting Lucinda, which she highlighted as her main problem with them.

She still was a team member at the end of the day, doing what was asked of her, which was better than when she has also reacted negatively to a situation (and actually not achieved all she should have as a result). I think she has had much worse weeks behind her.

Alex and Lee's comments in the boardroom were destructive in mind of they could be in the same team next week - did they think they'd lost too? I think one of Lucinda's best decisions was to not retaliate in the boardroom (from as much as we saw), but they can't complain if Lucinda doesn't back down from what she wants to do from now on in (which can be equally a problem in the team).
GoodMikey
23-05-2008
Originally Posted by peely:
“ but Lee's and Alex's ideas were narrow to the point of cringeworthy!!”

Lee suggested the name for the tissues which was the main reason they won the task, because the name was a great idea.
Cadence
23-05-2008
Originally Posted by ArtyAttack:
“Nick Hewer sums up Lucinda perfectly in the preview clip for next weeks task on the Official site.”


Interesting
<<
<
6 of 15
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map