Originally Posted by Citizen Sputnik:
“Signature were entertaining, sure, but the whole point of these talent shows is to find someone original, who can have a proper career as a top flight entertainer.
Regardless of the Bollywood stuff, it's 99% a Michael Jackson tribute act - MINUS the singing! Hardly worthy of going through to the final, is it?
Personally, I think there are three things BGT could do without:
1: Kids
2: Animal acts
3: Dance acts, especially the massive dance troups.”
“Signature were entertaining, sure, but the whole point of these talent shows is to find someone original, who can have a proper career as a top flight entertainer.
Regardless of the Bollywood stuff, it's 99% a Michael Jackson tribute act - MINUS the singing! Hardly worthy of going through to the final, is it?
Personally, I think there are three things BGT could do without:
1: Kids
2: Animal acts
3: Dance acts, especially the massive dance troups.”
Firstly, if you look back at their audition, it was 50% MJ and 50% Bangra. That's why their act stood out for me. Not because a guy came on mid-act with a broom
Secondly, if the public voted it worthy of a place in the final, then that's what counts.
Thirdly, if you removed the kids, animal acts and dancers you'd be left with X-Factor




Could work for all kinds of 'wars' between races and religions - as a message of ' let's dance , not make wars'.
. I'd have loved to have been in the audience and been able to see the whole performance with the warring sides, instead of the arty farty camera angles we are forced to endure!
, Now there is a guy who definately enjoys what he does