|
||||||||
The Harry Appreciation thread |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,894
|
Isn't he a bit young for DS?
![]() I know that there are young posters on here, but I'd have thought that there were very few under the age of about 15. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,797
|
i now a few 13 year old that have got an account with DS and he might not come on but there is a comment on his bebo that says there's an appreciation thread all about him and a link to the DS home page
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: the royal box
Posts: 2,769
|
if it ever lasted long enough, or gets revived he could graduate into a Dodger as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,797
|
i think harry will be good as oliver or as dodger
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London, or thereabouts
Posts: 1,437
|
DS does seem intended for people a bit older. But then again, kids these days are incredibly media/internet etc savvy it's quite scary. (and that makes me sound like an old fart already lol.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,797
|
i know young kids do ict from year 3 so by the time there 12 there really clever on computers and can do anything on the internet
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 121
|
I don't think age is the problem. I think it is maturity
![]() Kids can use the internet, granted, but some tend to use it for the wrong reasons (youtube fangirls, I mean you ) It depends on whether you are mature enough to make structured and clever comments etcetera.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,797
|
Quote:
I don't think age is the problem. I think it is maturity
![]() Kids can use the internet, granted, but some tend to use it for the wrong reasons (youtube fangirls, I mean you ) It depends on whether you are mature enough to make structured and clever comments etcetera. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 88
|
Thought I'd resuscitate this thread as Roman Mysteries is back on BBC1 on tuesday and he's really rather good in it (can't vouch for the entire show as have done a fair amount of fast-forwarding but it looks pretty okay, sure its entirely historically accurate as well. Maybe.).
And agree with Piper, think Harry would indeed make a good Dodger in time. Although think Arthur would too if they trained him up. Dodger is more of a belter so his voice doesn't have to be too melodic, it certainly wasn't in the 1994 production anyway. Think cheeky chappy Arthur could be really good. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 969
|
Just thought i'd say i saw him as Oliver back in December, and he was amazing
![]() Can still remember everything about it, he full on stood out, actually managed to get the same amount of applause as Dodger which is unusual! Bless him, he's so small aswell, yet he got taken out of the show for being 'too tall' LOL He's adorable too, really good looking for saying he's 14, 15 in September, ah bless him
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44.




