• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Britain's Got Talent
How did Cheeky Monkeys in 10 years time beat Charlie Green!?
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Ethereal
29-05-2008
Is anyone else completely confused by this attempt at humour? Cheeky Monkeys are a boy and girl, Strike are two men. So I don't know how Strike can be "Cheeky Monkeys in 10 years time".
Reality Sucks
29-05-2008
......and Strike are doing martial arts moves while cheeky monkeys are dance and gymnastics.
purrfect_catlov
29-05-2008
Originally Posted by MrsSpoon:
“There you go. Am I the only one who thought that the song was OK? The rap was a bit of a mistake but Charlie's performance was great and I am sure he has a long career ahead of him. Cheeky Monkeys? Well who knows if they will become professional dancers.”

I love charlie he is very talented, but dont worry too much as according to GMTV this morning he has been offered a recording contract by Simon Cowell anyway, so he will do well either way.
utoia2007
29-05-2008
Beer you crack me up! How exactly is strike's- karate kicks, somersaults, backward somersaults, punching anything like what the cheeky monkeys or George does?? Lol. CM do cartwheels and George does body popping and hip hop. Maybe we where watching different shows?
XxLiannexX
29-05-2008
Cheeky monkeys and Charlie Green are both equally talented but unfortunatly Charlie didn't have it last night..The song screwed his chances.
Beer
29-05-2008
Cheeky Monkeys and Strike are one and the same. Don't you see the resemblance. Look closely. In 10 years time Cheeky Monkeys will enter Britain's Got Talent and will lose again - only to return back after a massive obsession with a gym and lots of angry shouting to call themselves STRIKE and steal moves from other acts like

Nemesis
George Sampson
Flava
That kid who walked off stage and swore
Andrew Johnston
Paul Daniels
Jabba the Hutt
dome
29-05-2008
Originally Posted by MrsSpoon:
“There you go. Am I the only one who thought that the song was OK? The rap was a bit of a mistake but Charlie's performance was great and I am sure he has a long career ahead of him. Cheeky Monkeys? Well who knows if they will become professional dancers.”


It wasn't that bad, it had a very late 60's variety show sound to it.

Simon was only peed off because he didn't own the royalties for it.

The kid has definitely got talent.
Fudd
29-05-2008
Originally Posted by Beer:
“Cheeky Monkeys and Strike are one and the same. Don't you see the resemblance. Look closely. In 10 years time Cheeky Monkeys will enter Britain's Got Talent and will lose again - only to return back after a massive obsession with a gym and lots of angry shouting to call themselves STRIKE and steal moves from other acts like

Nemesis
George Sampson
Flava
That kid who walked off stage and swore
Andrew Johnston
Paul Daniels
Jabba the Hutt”

While Charlie is just a Frank Sinatra impersonator. All he's doing is copying a genre of music that's been around for years.

Sorry, sorry, STEALING a type of music that's been around for years.
Beer
29-05-2008
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“While Charlie is just a Frank Sinatra impersonator. All he's doing is copying a genre of music that's been around for years.

Sorry, sorry, STEALING a type of music that's been around for years. ”

Fudd, there is a big difference in singing a genre of music and stealing moves from acts you're in a competition with.
Forever Awkward
29-05-2008
Originally Posted by Beer:
“How did Cheeky Monkeys in 10 years time beat Charlie Green!?”

Unless the girl is planning a sex change, I don't know how your logic can work.

Charlie was beaten by the song. Who on Earth advised him to sing that?

I did feel sorry for him because he is genuinely talented and in a very different way for a boy of his age. It's a travesty that he is not in the final and the very ordinary choirboy, Andrew Johnston, is.

Having said that, I liked both the acts who went through last night.
Fudd
29-05-2008
Originally Posted by Beer:
“Fudd, there is a big difference in singing a genre of music and stealing moves from acts you're in a competition with.”

The basics was still martial arts, and though they added music, they still choreographed martial arts move into it. It wasn't stealing from other acts at all. They created a show and it impressed.

I haven't heard any other acts, such as Nemesis, Flava, George Sampson, kicking up a fuss, nor have the judges been upset about stealing. The reason being because the act was based in martials arts, all they did was add music and choreograph the arts to it.
i_love_tv
31-05-2008
I was wondering what the title of the topic meant & now I know.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map