• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Britain's Got Talent
Jeremy Lynch or Andrew Muir?
Beer
29-05-2008
Which would you go for?

I would have gone for Jeremy.
Honeyblossom
29-05-2008
So would I. I think he has more star potential and he was good looking to so young girls would love him.
Love Bear
29-05-2008
Jeremy definitely.

Too many singers and dancers this year, would have been nice to see something else go through.
Toony™®
29-05-2008
Jeremy cos of his youtube videos!
Fudd
29-05-2008
Jeremy - something different and novel, and we know from the auditions that he can perform brilliantly.

Andrew was ok, but nothing special. More X Factor material.
lordo350
29-05-2008
Yeah I felt sorry for Jeromey you could tell he was gutted after his performance. They do like singers but I think he offers more variety and if he had done better they might have considered him more closley imo
Selena
29-05-2008
I prefered Jeremy. But I can understand why the chose Andrew.
Sid_1979
29-05-2008
Jeremy.

We are saturated with singers on Reality Shows as it is.

Enough is enough.
Resident Shiva
29-05-2008
I wanted Jeremy to go though. Andrew was nothing special IMO and while Jeremy made mistakes I still enjoyed his performance more.
Beer
29-05-2008
Me too. Andrew is a singer and a good one but there are a lot out there. He's not exactly a great singer.

Jeremy has something unique.
fab cesc
29-05-2008
Andrew was better on the night but Jeremy has tons more potential so i wanted jeremy to go through
helsbels42
29-05-2008
I couldn't decide - I really liked them both...what a shame that one of them didn't make it
Helena Handcart
29-05-2008
Jeremy because he is not a singer
pilgrim4j
29-05-2008
Jeremy - ball dropped and all....
Eclipse80
29-05-2008
Jeremy has more star quality and more potential to entertain.
Andrew is bland and forgettable.
Beer
29-05-2008
Originally Posted by Eclipse80:
“Jeremy has more star quality and more potential to entertain.
Andrew is bland and forgettable.”

The shoes didn't help did they.
pilgrim4j
29-05-2008
Originally Posted by Beer:
“The shoes didn't help did they.”

heart-attack fodder
beanbean
29-05-2008
i preferred Andrew but i probably would have picked jeremy if he hadnt made 2 mistakes.
utoia2007
29-05-2008
i agree andrew should be on xfactor, he would of stood a good chance of winning, he wont win on BGT.
sunnymeg
30-05-2008
I think Jeremy should have gone through, the british public voted him into at least third place and that was with his act going wrong. To my mind there are too many singing and dancing acts in the final (if you count Strike as a dance act), Kate and Gin are the only act offering anything really different, but unfortunately I don't think they'll have much of a chance of winning.
kobiashimarux
30-05-2008
Andrew, the other guy was boring.
satellite
30-05-2008
I'd have voted for Jeremy, although he did drop the ball twice! T

There are too many singers now and I fear we may well suffer the backlash with Andrew (sob story I'm a plumber) bringing back the 'Leon Jackson' factor in the finals with all the Scotties voting for him, when he's just not good enough.
samcheese
30-05-2008
Jeremy.....didn't want another singer. This is a variety show. Andrew should've gone on X Factor....same with Madonna I think.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map