Strange.
They thought Rachel and Sam would go through - why would they think that if they knew the voting from previous weeks?
Rachel didn't have support as she was in the bottom two so she went -but she had more votes than Sam in the SF and was getting better.
If they discussed who should go of Jessie and Jodie who didn't they want - looks like Jodie.
Jessie lost momentum - yes but who gave her the songs that lost the momentum? Who didn't shut Barrowman up?
Jessie might pull it out on the night but Jodie is great too ....what does that say about Sam?
How do they know anyone can pull it out on the night - some shows do see final night performances changing who wins - on others its all about stories and who looks most like or most attractive to the voters. The show looks even less credible though if Jessie outdoes Judy Garland and Jodie wins made to look like Mrs Mopp.
If Jodie is so far ahead that she is unstoppable, is the aim to still try and stop her, make her look credible as a winner or make it clear they don't want her so she gets more publicity? Back to question one - if they they knew she was that popular why would they be surprised she went straight into the final.........