Was there any reference to why this was shouted at Amanda?

I missed the last few shows.

Cheers

Maybe because she would have said the total opposite if they took their shirts off as she did with Strike!

But I agreed with her, in fact I thought she was being too nice!

and to be correct it's 'should have'

Probably an annoyed family member. It was a stupid bitter comment to make IMO. Strike were a lot better than Per Diem even if they had kept their shirts on.

Thanks for the answer. I was unsure if i had missed something like a bloke taking his shirt of to sway her vote.

I could not care less

no not you, to the person who yelled it

Thats ok

Thought you had the role of grammar police tonight

LOL!
I thought it was aimed at the OP too!

You could bet if they did take there clothes off then Amanda would have had something different to say!.

no soz

every little helps

the Tesco joke I get ...well done... and yes they OVER cooked the microwave song

Repeat. Its should HAVE. HAVE. Got it?

yea but amanda only comments on the boys being fit rather than their act, like how old is she for christ sake!

not only Should Have, but Should have TAKEN!
Nowt wrong with being grammar police- English is a beautiful language and deserves to be written and spoken properly.

What about 'taken' instead of 'took', too?

I didn't hear anyone shout this. I heard someone shout "Should have taken your shirts off".

Whoever shouted it had a point, would Amanda had buzzed them so early if they had?

Poor guys were obviously nervous and that buzz threw them completely.

I agree with this but Simon had a point about Piers not buzzing when he buzzed Jeremy for dropping the ball. That buzz put Jeremy off his stroke far more than the first buzz put Per Diem off. They had made the decision to show that they swap roles and it didn't pay off.

I could not care less. Everyone else in this post knew what I meant so go and try to belittle someone else.

And it's it's, not its


It's not belittling, it's educating.