... we were supposed to be voting for who we wanted to see in the Royal Variety Show, NOT who should then perform like some kind of seal for the rest of their lives for us because they should be in our gratitude forever...
When you vote for someone on a show like this IT IS NOT THE SAME AS BUYING A SHARE IN A COMPANY, YOU DO NOT HAVE RIGHTS TO THAT PERSON.
Some people on other threads are acting like the biggest travesty about a non-singing act winning is that unlike the singing acts, they won't be touting their wares on every TV show, radio station or in every magazine/newspaper.
What's so wrong in George winning, performing on the RVS, then maybe using the money to become a choreographer and just getting on with his life?
Me spending £1.50 voting for him 3 times tonight does not mean he owes me a lifetime of me knowing what he's doing with his life!
When you vote for someone on a show like this IT IS NOT THE SAME AS BUYING A SHARE IN A COMPANY, YOU DO NOT HAVE RIGHTS TO THAT PERSON.
Some people on other threads are acting like the biggest travesty about a non-singing act winning is that unlike the singing acts, they won't be touting their wares on every TV show, radio station or in every magazine/newspaper.
What's so wrong in George winning, performing on the RVS, then maybe using the money to become a choreographer and just getting on with his life?
Me spending £1.50 voting for him 3 times tonight does not mean he owes me a lifetime of me knowing what he's doing with his life!