• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
For me, Lucinda is the real winner
<<
<
3 of 8
>>
>
OK Then!!!
04-06-2008
Even though she may not have been right, She should of stayed on and Alex or Helene should of gone, even if she wasn't right it would of been a better final
Vivid
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by diva_moon:
“I have to disagree and say that this is one of the least observant comments I have ever seen on this forum. I suppose it might hold true for anyone who cannot see beyond bluff and bluster. Unfortunately this does seem to include Sir Alan and cronies who have bowed to the pressure of lying troglodyte paul and his ilk.

Such a shame, but I am sure things will change for the better once people realise that teamwork is not about stamping on people or stabbing them in the back.

I wouldn't want to argue with the successful businesswoman on "You're Fired" just now who said basically that Lucinda's too good for Sir Alan's organisation and that her problems were not entirely her fault.”

Dear oh dear, you observations are utterly refuted by the inconvenient facts.

She knows nothing of team work, she almost sabotaged two tasks through her own indulgence and foot stamping and when she wasn't sabotaging she was being inept or babbling, air-headed nonsense.

Lucinda lovers seem to have some sort of beret fetish or just simply like to see some well dressed blonde swanning around and have no wish to evaluate her business skills, or perhaps they are simply are blinded by her bright clothes.

The Apprentice is not a fashion show! Nor is it a care in the community programme for providing the inept a leg up in business.
Vivid
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by 2LO:
“I was always taught as a child that it is wicked to mock the afflicted.

May I therefore suggest that anyone of a religious bent say a prayer for our fellow forum member 'Vivid' that he may be released from his torment of detestation for a fellow being and that he may see the error of making destructive, spiteful posts about another human.

Whilst not of a religious disposition myself I shall simply hope that he can work through whatever it is that troubles him and emerge with a more positive outlook that will free him from the desire to be, well, just plain nasty.”

I don't detest Lucinda, she is ok as a human being, unlike someone like Jenny C, but I am stunned that some people can't see underneath the beret and see her self-indulgent, detached from reality air-headedness.

As a dress shop assistant she would be fine, as much else she is appalling.
Siannah
04-06-2008
Lucinda only wanted the position with Sir Alan to fuel her Ego. That's my honest opinion. Not fair for to take the role knowing she doesn't need the bloody position to begin with. Good luck to her though. I did like her dress sense. Very good.
williams96
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by Vivid:
“
The Apprentice is not a fashion show! Nor is it a care in the community programme for providing the inept a leg up in business.”

Here's another 'inconvenient fact' for you (as you like to put it).

I doubt someone earning £100k+ on their own two feet need any care in the community programmes to help them. In fact she could probably afford to run her own.
2LO
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by Vivid:
“On the contrary I am very polite and charming to people, but I am robust in making points on matters of substance, and I don't use the sort of language you clearly are happy using.”

Self knowledge is a wonderful thing.

It is just a shame that it doesn't come in bottles as that means we are unable to club together and buy you one to replenish your clearly completely exhausted supply.
Vivid
04-06-2008
I predict that she will be getting fewer contracts than she was before after her appalling performance in the Apprentice.
Vivid
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by 2LO:
“Self knowledge is a wonderful thing.

It is just a shame that it doesn't come in bottles as that means we are unable to club together and buy you one to replenish your clearly completely exhausted supply. ”

As possible the least perceptive and most detached from reality poster on this forum I don't think you are in a position to make comments about self-knowledge.
williams96
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by Vivid:
“I predict that she will be getting fewer contracts than she was before after her appalling performance in the Apprentice.”

You might want to employ a risk analyst before making bets like that.
2LO
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by Vivid:
“I predict that she will be getting fewer contracts than she was before after her appalling performance in the Apprentice.”

I'm quite sure that is what you would like to happen.

However, if you look at the sentiment of probably 95+% of the posters on this thread and if you look at her popularity in the site poll, and if you look at her reception on "you're fired", then unless the DS membership and the audience of "you're fired" hold opinions that are completely askew from the populace at large I suspect that you would be dissappointed.

She will go from strength to strength despite the futile wishes of a tiny minority of petty, viscious, small minded and spiteful people who just cannot stand for anyone to be different.
CLARKSONIOUS
04-06-2008
I think Sir Alan has gone from anchor to w@nker, firing Lucinda!
jabegy
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by CLARKSONIOUS:
“I think Sir Alan has gone from anchor to w@nker, firing Lucinda!”

I think you're right, but I think in the end he did her a favour. Can you imagine a class act like Lucinda working for an ex barrow boy like him....................













waiting for Vivids comments..................................
EdensUltimate
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by CLARKSONIOUS:
“I think Sir Alan has gone from anchor to w@nker, firing Lucinda!”

Hehe, definitely! My God, he's made quite a few dodgy decisions this year. With "dodgy" being understatement of the decade.
Chilli Dragon
04-06-2008
I wouldn't work for Sir Alan if he paid me £100k a year!

What? He will...?

Sir Alan, stick it up your ill-informed arse!
Elzbells
04-06-2008
I don't know if I can bring myself to watch the final - I can't stand any of the finalists and the thought of the chin-woman returning is making making my flesh crawl, already.

This year has been entertaining for all the wrong reasons and I've got a feeling next weeks show is going to serve up more of the same dross - I only hope Lucinda and Sara refused to appear because if they are featured no doubt they will continue to be blamed and marginalised by the rest of the baying mob.

It makes me feel so nostalgic for the first series when the candidates had a modicum of intelligence and business sense.
Vivid
04-06-2008
Originally Posted by 2LO:
“I'm quite sure that is what you would like to happen.

However, if you look at the sentiment of probably 95+% of the posters on this thread and if you look at her popularity in the site poll, and if you look at her reception on "you're fired", then unless the DS membership and the audience of "you're fired" hold opinions that are completely askew from the populace at large I suspect that you would be dissappointed.

She will go from strength to strength despite the futile wishes of a tiny minority of petty, viscious, small minded and spiteful people who just cannot stand for anyone to be different.”

I think the vast majority of her supporters are interested in someone who smiles, who is well dressed, who is a bit kooky, who is entertaining and full of idiosyncratic mannerisms, who has a large range of stockings, who is novel, and wish to be entertained more than anything. These same people don't seem to have a grip on the business world or what constitutes competence.

These same people don't wish to acknowledge her petty attitude, inept brain and non-existent skill set and forget that this woman was intent on sabotage on several tasks in some sort of extended self-indulgent foot stamping exercise when she felt confident enough to assert herself.
Sid_1979
05-06-2008
Originally Posted by Elzbells:
“I don't know if I can bring myself to watch the final - I can't stand any of the finalists and the thought of the chin-woman returning is making making my flesh crawl, already.

This year has been entertaining for all the wrong reasons and I've got a feeling next weeks show is going to serve up more of the same dross - I only hope Lucinda and Sara refused to appear because if they are featured no doubt they will continue to be blamed and marginalised by the rest of the baying mob.

It makes me feel so nostalgic for the first series when the candidates had a modicum of intelligence and business sense.”

I agree with everything you said.

The "baddies" will all be reunited next week (bar Raef) and the true champions (Lucinda and Sara) will be excluded further.

It will be an anti-climax whoever wins. The joy from the show has gone now.
Vivid
05-06-2008
I would agree that this crop of candidates is poorer than previous years. Where are the James Max's?
EdensUltimate
05-06-2008
Originally Posted by Vivid:
“I think the vast majority of her supporters are interested in someone who smiles, who is well dressed, who is a bit kooky, who is entertaining and full of idiosyncratic mannerisms, who has a large range of stockings, who is novel, and wish to be entertained more than anything. These same people don't seem to have a grip on the business world or what constitutes competence.

These same people don't wish to acknowledge her petty attitude, inept brain and non-existent skill set and forget that this woman was intent on sabotage on several tasks in some sort of extended self-indulgent foot stamping exercise when she felt confident enough to assert herself.”

How on Earth can you say things such as her "inept brain"? What justification is there in such a pathetic attack?
2LO
05-06-2008
Originally Posted by Vivid:
“I think the vast majority of her supporters are interested in someone ..., who has a large range of stockings,”

Hmmm.

It becomes clear that you have been concentrating on entirely different aspects of this series than the rest of us.

Is there anything you would like to tell us?
Elzbells
05-06-2008
Originally Posted by Sid_1979:
“I agree with everything you said.

The "baddies" will all be reunited next week (bar Raef) and the true champions (Lucinda and Sara) will be excluded further.

It will be an anti-climax whoever wins. The joy from the show has gone now.”

Oh well I suppose the Beeb is happy they finally managed to concoct their own version of Big Brother which is ironic as Claire is reported to have applied four times to be on that show.

I think all the Lucinda fans should go down the pub next Wednesday at 9:00, wearing a beret, of course, and leave the pond life to fight it out.
CLARKSONIOUS
05-06-2008
In all honesty does anyone really care who wins this farce, now Lucinda's gone?

It's resembling a pikeys picnic.
2LO
05-06-2008
Originally Posted by Elzbells:
“I think all the Lucinda fans should go down the pub next Wednesday at 9:00, wearing a beret, of course, and leave the pond life to fight it out.”

What a brilliant idea.

(Having set the VCR/PVR, of course. )
2LO
05-06-2008
Originally Posted by EdensUltimate:
“How on Earth can you say things such as her "inept brain"? What justification is there in such a pathetic attack?”

His entire existance is predicated on his hatred for Lucinda and Claire.

It's almost like something out of a Sci-Fi novel!
Sid_1979
05-06-2008
Originally Posted by Elzbells:
“I think all the Lucinda fans should go down the pub next Wednesday at 9:00, wearing a beret, of course, and leave the pond life to fight it out.”

I may do the same (minus the beret) and raise a glass to her
<<
<
3 of 8
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map