I noticed that SAS used this a lot to excuse the plethora of mistakes that Michael made, but not so for Alex. Isn't Alex younger than Michael?
The age 'defence'
SAS doesn't have to use the age defence for Alex though; he's perfectly capable of doing that himself. 
Originally Posted by omgwtfbbq:
“SAS doesn't have to use the age defence for Alex though; he's perfectly capable of doing that himself.”
“SAS doesn't have to use the age defence for Alex though; he's perfectly capable of doing that himself.
”
Beat me to it!
Originally Posted by omgwtfbbq:
“SAS doesn't have to use the age defence for Alex though; he's perfectly capable of doing that himself.”
“SAS doesn't have to use the age defence for Alex though; he's perfectly capable of doing that himself.
”
LOL, yea I know based on yesterdays show Alex is more than happy to highlight his age, but it just makes some of SAS's reasoning this season all the more bizarre I think.
Originally Posted by whackyracer:
“LOL, yea I know based on yesterdays show Alex is more than happy to highlight his age, but it just makes some of SAS's reasoning this season all the more bizarre I think.”
“LOL, yea I know based on yesterdays show Alex is more than happy to highlight his age, but it just makes some of SAS's reasoning this season all the more bizarre I think.”
Yes, I agree. Lindi is even younger than both Alex and Michael but she was never given as many chances as they were. Sara was the same age as Michael but she wasn't given another chance either. Only the young men have been excused for their incompetence, it seems.
