• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Love from Lucinda
<<
<
11 of 11
>>
>
booklover
17-06-2008
Originally Posted by 2LO:
“You seem to be polarising things.

Helene never even came close to suggesting that she and Lucinda were best buddies. All she said was that things were sorted out.

Given that Lucinda had already stated twice, very publicly, that that was the case, the timing so called 'having none of it' was spiteful and inappropriate.

As a long time Lucinda supporter I was very disappointed at her behaviour where she showed conclusively that she was prepared to let the world know that she was a liar just to hurt another contestant after the whole thing was over.

I had thought much more of her than that.

Naughty, Naughty, Naughty!



What has editing got to do with this particular incident? What could have been ommited that would have justified Lucinda's behaviour?”

She said that Lucinda had told her some very personal stuff; that in itself would suggest that she thought they were good friends (unless she assumes that everyone tells everyone else personal stuff). BTW, this post is not a slight on Helene, before you leap to her defence. I'm just pointing out what Helene said.
2LO
17-06-2008
Originally Posted by booklover:
“She said that Lucinda had told her some very personal stuff; that in itself would suggest that she thought they were good friends (unless she assumes that everyone tells everyone else personal stuff). BTW, this post is not a slight on Helene, before you leap to her defence. I'm just pointing out what Helene said.”

Well, Lucy never denied that she had told Helene personal things.

Whether or not you want to spin Helene mentioning that as suggesting they are best buddies or not is up to you. In the absence of any denial from Lucinda it would appear to be true and thus not relevant except that it shows Helene had good reason to assume things had been patched up. (Apart from Lucinda expressly saying so, twice).
Mazzarin
17-06-2008
Ive always like the idea of moving on.....
2LO
17-06-2008
Originally Posted by Mazzarin:
“Ive always like the idea of moving on.....”

Go for it then!

A couple of little tips that might help you:

Don't read threads that you want to move on from.

Especially, don't reply to them as that just keeps them at the top of the index page longer.


Hope this helps.
Mazzarin
17-06-2008
Heres a tip for you;

Don't carry on a discussion that has been done to death on one thread resulting in it being closed.

I like this thread, its a shame it been dominated by the rejects from another.
2LO
17-06-2008
Originally Posted by Mazzarin:
“Heres a tip for you;

Don't carry on a discussion that has been done to death on one thread resulting in it being closed.”

Sorry, you just said that you liked the idea of moving on.

You're not actually very good at it, are you?

Perhaps if you practice some more.
GerriP
17-06-2008
Originally Posted by ForeverBeret:
“If such a poem existed (and it doesn't) then the hypothetical author might have PMed it to Lucinda (assuming it is Lucinda) by now. If the potential Lucinda/not-Lucinda (poised in a state of quantum uncertainty, like Schrodinger's Cat) doesn't serve the non-existent author with a restraining order by the end of the weekend then he or she might get round to posting it on the thread.”

and does the cat exist when you close the box

EDIT: Oh and in case anyone missed it while sniping... DS Forum Support posted back there... So the Mods appear to have spoken!
Ignazio
17-06-2008
Originally Posted by Mazzarin:
“Heres a tip for you;

Don't carry on a discussion that has been done to death on one thread resulting in it being closed.

I like this thread, its a shame it been dominated by the rejects from another.”

There's curious - you like it so much you made your first post just under 24 hours ago - and from your grand total of 6 posts 3 have been on this thread. btw. I posted on here for the first time on 12th June - same day as I posted on the other thread; before you were even a member - I take it I don't fit into your definition of rejects.
Scissor*Sister
17-06-2008
Could we please stop this argument? It is bloody ridiculous and i'm totally fed up with it. The whole "You're Fired" incident wasn't that huge a deal in the first place and now people have endlessly argued about it for nearly a week, I am thoroughly sick of it.

If you want to argue, take it elsewhere. Just shut up! The mods already tried to stop this pointless argument by closing the other thread and putting a warning on this one. Just let it lie!

Part of me wishes the other thread hadn't been closed. Because then people wouldn't have infiltrated this thread with all this crap.
ForeverBeret
17-06-2008
Originally Posted by GerriP:
“and does the cat exist when you close the box ”

I'd like to see a physicist manage to get the cat into the box in the first place.

That could be a task next year. "Do you know there are six million cat owners in the UK and half of them are in a state of quantum uncertainty because you messed up? Yer fired!"

But I'm wandering off topic...
DS Forum Support
17-06-2008
Thread Closed.
<<
<
11 of 11
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map