If you apply for any job or postition you have to sign that it is honest and you are required to give your signature on this.
Doesnt it invalidate his application?
Doesnt it invalidate his application?
Lee would have had to have signed honesty clause
Originally Posted by marling:
“Could he fake his signature?
”
“Could he fake his signature?
”
Not if he had to use spell check
That said I loved the guy a deserved winner
Originally Posted by Shrike:
“When asked about the 'CV lie' on YBH Sir Alan said he didn't care about it.
”
“When asked about the 'CV lie' on YBH Sir Alan said he didn't care about it.
”
No he didn't. He wasn't happy about it, but indicated that he could overlook it in light of the 12 weeks as a whole.
Originally Posted by gilliedew:
“If you apply for any job or postition you have to sign that it is honest and you are required to give your signature on this.
Doesnt it invalidate his application?”
“If you apply for any job or postition you have to sign that it is honest and you are required to give your signature on this.
Doesnt it invalidate his application?”
I've never had to sign one
Originally Posted by vidalia:
“Did he have to sign a sanity clause?
Don't be silly, there's no such thing as sanity clause.”
“Did he have to sign a sanity clause?
Don't be silly, there's no such thing as sanity clause.”
Not funny.
Originally Posted by gilliedew:
“If you apply for any job or postition you have to sign that it is honest and you are required to give your signature on this.
Doesnt it invalidate his application?”
“If you apply for any job or postition you have to sign that it is honest and you are required to give your signature on this.
Doesnt it invalidate his application?”
Only if it was a standard application form. If you submit a CV then there is no clause
Originally Posted by Sweet FA:
“Not funny.”
“Not funny.
”
It was when the Marx Brothers did it. It does need an Italian accent to work properly, I'll give you that.
Originally Posted by gilliedew:
“If you apply for any job or postition you have to sign that it is honest and you are required to give your signature on this.
Doesnt it invalidate his application?”
“If you apply for any job or postition you have to sign that it is honest and you are required to give your signature on this.
Doesnt it invalidate his application?”
Sr'Alan owns the company. The final decision is with him.
Originally Posted by Shrike:
“When asked about the 'CV lie' on YBH Sir Alan said he didn't care about it.
”
“When asked about the 'CV lie' on YBH Sir Alan said he didn't care about it.
”
It probably appeals to Sr'Alans "duck and dive" ethos.
And... it is his company. He can employ anyone he wishes to employ.
Originally Posted by gilliedew:
“If you apply for any job or postition you have to sign that it is honest and you are required to give your signature on this.
Doesnt it invalidate his application?”
“If you apply for any job or postition you have to sign that it is honest and you are required to give your signature on this.
Doesnt it invalidate his application?”
At the Company's discretion.
Hence, if Suralan doesn't care, that's the end of the matter.
Yes understood
Not good PR for the comapny though
Sir Alan might OK it but it is not good when even the Prime Minister has said it is not the way to do things.
Not good PR for the comapny though
Sir Alan might OK it but it is not good when even the Prime Minister has said it is not the way to do things.
Originally Posted by gilliedew:
“Yes understood
Not good PR for the comapny though
Sir Alan might OK it but it is not good when even the Prime Minister has said it is not the way to do things.”
“Yes understood
Not good PR for the comapny though
Sir Alan might OK it but it is not good when even the Prime Minister has said it is not the way to do things.”
Can't fault you there!
I agree it's not a great way to go about things - I was just saying.
Originally Posted by gilliedew:
“Yes understood
Not good PR for the comapny though
Sir Alan might OK it but it is not good when even the Prime Minister has said it is not the way to do things.”
“Yes understood
Not good PR for the comapny though
Sir Alan might OK it but it is not good when even the Prime Minister has said it is not the way to do things.”
It's a tv programme - surely our elected government should concern themselves with more serious issues!!!
Originally Posted by Ignazio:
“It's a tv programme - surely our elected government should concern themselves with more serious issues!!!”
“It's a tv programme - surely our elected government should concern themselves with more serious issues!!!”
Actually, Sir Alan is some sort of enterprise advisory to the government so I think the government do very well to concern themselves over it! I don't think he ought to be, given the example he sets in his dealings with recruitment and employees unless the government want to align themselves not just with taking more from the poor to give to the better off as they already have done, but with the bigotry, prejudice, dishonesty and bullying that SAS seems to think is only natural in business. Perhaps it is, but the government should be setting an example for change.
Time to give Branson a chance, I think! I've no idea if he would be any better, but let him show himself anyway...
