• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
The Official Helene/Lucinda Debate Thread
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
Katenutzs
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by Mazzarin:
“Isn't it a distint possibility that people saw comments/actions (such as the `to camera` moments or bits were they were not present) on the aired show that they were not aware of at the time?

Some people might still feel to urge to retaliate. For example Lucinda was not aware Alex had called her `poison', none of them would of known Helene called them all gobshites.”


I wonder why none of the others felt the need to butt in and shoot down others then ... have they more restraint and dignity than Lucinda or simply did they realise it was a reality show where dog ate dog and accepted not all comments by others were going to be nice (in fact most said unsavoury things about others on camera)

Can Lucinda not control her emotions?

Does she see herself as a victim?
apprentice_fan
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by Mazzarin:
“Isn't it a distint possibility that people saw comments/actions (such as the `to camera` moments or bits were they were not present) on the aired show that they were not aware of at the time?

Some people might still feel to urge to retaliate. For example Lucinda was not aware Alex had called her `poison', none of them would of known Helene called them all gobshites.”

But after the interviews every thing was clear to Lucinda. If she have said exactly the same words in her you're fired show, no one could have blamed her. I think the timing was just wrong.
Mazzarin
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“I wonder why none of the others felt the need to butt in and shoot down others then ... have they more restraint and dignity than Lucinda or simply did they realise it was a reality show where dog ate dog and accepted not all comments by others were going to be nice (in fact most said unsavoury things about others on camera)

Can Lucinda not control her emotions?

Does she see herself as a victim?”

This is what I dont get.

Its one thing to dislike her, to disagree with her but to suggest this is a case of someone being out of control or `imploding` as someone said on another thread is absurd.
Katenutzs
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by Mazzarin:
“This is what I dont get.

Its one thing to dislike her, to disagree with her but to suggest this is a case of someone being out of control or `imploding` as someone said on another thread is absurd.”

I never once said I disliked Lucinda, she brought an awful lot to the series. Her clothes were great and I do hope it inspires younger women in business not to always wear dark colours.

I honestly feel that she lost control for a few minutes on the last YF'd programme and hence her little outburst which made her look petty and vindictive. It was not nice to watch especially when she tried to drag others (Raef) into it.
jjackson42
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“I never once said I disliked Lucinda, she brought an awful lot to the series. Her clothes were great and I do hope it inspires younger women in business not to always wear dark colours.

I honestly feel that she lost control for a few minutes on the last YF'd programme and hence her little outburst which made her look petty and vindictive. It was not nice to watch especially when she tried to drag others (Raef) into it.”

PERHAPS, just PERHAPS - and I just put this forward for general consideration as a definite maybe, PERHAPS Lucinda's remarks were an accurate expression of the general detestation she feels towards Helene??? (alegedly!) (lol)
pogo ogo
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“I never once said I disliked Lucinda, she brought an awful lot to the series. Her clothes were great and I do hope it inspires younger women in business not to always wear dark colours.

I honestly feel that she lost control for a few minutes on the last YF'd programme and hence her little outburst which made her look petty and vindictive. It was not nice to watch especially when she tried to drag others (Raef) into it.”

I thought she was really nice and was truly the victim of bullying the first few weeks. When it got to the tissue task, she came out with really good criticisms towards the product, however, when it got to the car task, I believe she was playing the victim, rather than being the victim. Then, when it got to YF, she was indeed lowering herself to the level of Helene during the series and dragging poor Raef into it wasn't a great move for her either. However, I feel she may not have even realised she was doing it, as she conducted herself very well in comparison to other candidates throughout the series and reflecting on that, she wasn't so bad in terms of bitchiness and backstabbing.
Katenutzs
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by jjackson42:
“PERHAPS, just PERHAPS - and I just put this forward for general consideration as a definite maybe, PERHAPS Lucinda's remarks were an accurate expression of the general detestation she feels towards Helene??? (alegedly!) (lol)”

Then as a well rounded person she should have controlled her outburst and behaved with dignity on YF'd. By her outburst she shows she cannot stop herself from having her say NO matter what!

Nobody loves everyone we work with but we learn to tolerate them
Mazzarin
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“Then as a well rounded person she should have controlled her outburst and behaved with dignity on YF'd. By her outburst she shows she cannot stop herself from having her say NO matter what!

Nobody loves everyone we work with but we learn to tolerate them”

Oh come on. How does one outburst prove that?
apprentice_fan
18-06-2008
I think Lucinda expected an apology after what happened and she didn't get one. Helene wanted to give reasons as to why she behaved badly. Lucinda didn't want Helene to get away with it and we can't blame her for that. However, her choice of words was wrong. If she just echoed what she always said during the program about how a project manager should support the team and that she didn't expect anyone in business to behave the way Helene did, I think she would have been fine.

I didn't see a problem with Lucinda replying to Helene because what happened during that task was clearly wrong. However, it would have been much better had she utilized her chance in the previous show or expressed herself differently.

Kristina from series 3 was much worse in the apprentice special of the weakest link.

I also believe that this discussion, have been blown out of proportion. Lucinda is entitled to reply to Helene after what happened in the task. We know that Helene was not etirely honest in two occasions. I just think that she didn't express herself appropriately.
soulmate61
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by jjackson42:
“PERHAPS, just PERHAPS - and I just put this forward for general consideration as a definite maybe, PERHAPS Lucinda's remarks were an accurate expression of the general detestation she feels towards Helene??? (alegedly!) (lol)”


jjackson42 gingerly walking on eggshells.

Not a crime to get on with some colleagues better than others. No revelation if Lucinda disliked Helene. Even less surprise if Helene pronounced all her colleagues to be "gobsh*tes". We have been hearing worse for 3 months -- yawn.

But on the night a revelation did appear -- in the shape of a Moaner Lisa spectacularly well made up. In command of the floor and looking like butter wouldn't melt in her mouth, she proceeded to speak in dulcet tones softly painting an intimate picture of Lucinda right in front of Lucinda.

I believe the shock and insincerity of the delivery, more than what Helene said, triggered off an intervention on impulse. It is obvious nobody is happy about this incident, coming on Apprentice Lee's night of celebration.
jjackson42
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by soulmate61:
“ jjackson42 gingerly walking on eggshells.

Not a crime to get on with some colleagues better than others. No revelation if Lucinda disliked Helene. Even less surprise if Helene pronounced all her colleagues to be "gobsh*tes". We have been hearing worse for 3 months -- yawn.

But on the night a revelation did appear -- in the shape of a Moaner Lisa spectacularly well made up. In command of the floor and looking like butter wouldn't melt in her mouth, she proceeded to speak in dulcet tones softly painting an intimate picture of Lucinda right in front of Lucinda.

I believe the shock and insincerity of the delivery, more than what Helene said, triggered off an intervention on impulse. It is obvious nobody is happy about this incident, coming on Apprentice Lee's night of celebration.”

Taking everything into consideration, and without offering any specific interpretation of the actualite - AND while bearing in mind the possibility that other points of view could, concievably, exist - you might be right!!!

2LO
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by soulmate61:
“But on the night a revelation did appear -- in the shape of a Moaner Lisa spectacularly well made up. In command of the floor and looking like butter wouldn't melt in her mouth, she proceeded to speak in dulcet tones softly painting an intimate picture of Lucinda right in front of Lucinda.

I believe the shock and insincerity of the delivery, more than what Helene said, triggered off an intervention on impulse. It is obvious nobody is happy about this incident, coming on Apprentice Lee's night of celebration.”

Away from the pressures of the TA house Helene appeared as a relaxed, pleasant and confidant woman who thought, on the basis of previous public announcements from at least one other contestant, that all the nastiness had been forgotten and who was very happy about that.

Sadly, one candidate was not prepared to let anything go and caused a scene, but one which, fortunately, Helene handled with dignity and grace.
peely
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“I'm sure as long as he had backed up Lucinda's story that would have been the case on here, however you people would have been baying for his blood had he instead backed up Helene, so please dispense with the pretense on that score. There was not one single thing that was bad mannered about his decision to stay out of it. The only bad mannered person was Lucinda for trying to drag him in to her petty little fight. And I speak as someone who held Lucinda with a great deal of regard during the show.”

Who are "you people" exactly? I couldn't care less about any of them, including Lucinda, so no, I won't be baying for blood. Perhaps bad manners is the wrong phrase to use, but he went right down in my estimation for sitting on the fence for not wanting to be seen badly by either the Lucinda or Helene camp. I still don't think Lucinda was displaying bad manners in trying to defend herself, and asking someone to corroborate whether Helene had done the training or not.
peely
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by Mazzarin:
“This is what I dont get.

Its one thing to dislike her, to disagree with her but to suggest this is a case of someone being out of control or `imploding` as someone said on another thread is absurd.”

She speaks her mind basically, but that is preferable to people who prefer to undermine in a sneaky, underhand way, even if they do know when to keep their mouth shut for the cameras (most of the time).
sparkie70
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by 2LO:
“Away from the pressures of the TA house Helene appeared as a relaxed, pleasant and confidant woman who thought, on the basis of previous public announcements from at least one other contestant, that all the nastiness had been forgotten and who was very happy about that.

Sadly, one candidate was not prepared to let anything go and caused a scene, but one which, fortunately, Helene handled with dignity and grace.”

I though Helene handled the interview well concidering she was given a rather rough ride. I lost a lot of respect from Lucinda well before that show but she showed her true colours that night.
Sara Webb
18-06-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“I never once said I disliked Lucinda, she brought an awful lot to the series. Her clothes were great and I do hope it inspires younger women in business not to always wear dark colours.”

Good heavens. That brings new meaning to the phrase "damning with faint praise"!!
brangdon
19-06-2008
Originally Posted by peely:
“I still don't think Lucinda was displaying bad manners in trying to defend herself, and asking someone to corroborate whether Helene had done the training or not.”

We've pretty much established in other threads that Helene didn't get the training. She was in the room when Helene and Raef got trained, but she was doing something else. This was shown on the original programme, and the voice-over also mentions that only Lucinda was trained. When Lucinda has difficulty, there are times when Helene is looking over her shoulder trying to help, but there's nothing she can do. There's no reason why she shouldn't help. She wanted to win the task. All of this is on YouTube.

So Lucinda was wrong. She was also wrong about not patching up the relationship (which isn't to say the relationship didn't break down again later, or that Lucinda is best pals with Helene or anything like that).

Quote:
“Perhaps bad manners is the wrong phrase to use, but he went right down in my estimation for sitting on the fence for not wanting to be seen badly by either the Lucinda or Helene camp.”

My theory is that the true situation was too complex for Raef to explain. Especially as Lucinda was wrong. I don't think she'd have been quick to understand or accept it.
Cadence
19-06-2008
Originally Posted by brangdon:
“...My theory is that the true situation was too complex for Raef to explain...”

I agree. I believe that he knew it wasn't the time or place to prolong a complex argument and I suspect he didn't want to say anything that could be interpreted as critical of either Helene or Lucinda.
GratingCheese
19-06-2008
Originally Posted by 2LO:
“So which other candidate suffered an uninvited interruption from the floor by a fellow candidate?

If you can point to that happening I'll concede I was mistaken, otherwise my point stands.”

No it doesn't. Raef also spoke and could be heard clearly clearly, suggesting they were all fully miked which in turn suggests they were all invited to make a contibution if they wished. The only reason no other candidate spoke was due to not having any relevant input to Helene's interview topics.
2LO
19-06-2008
Originally Posted by GratingCheese:
“No it doesn't. Raef also spoke and could be heard clearly clearly, suggesting they were all fully miked which in turn suggests they were all invited to make a contibution if they wished. The only reason no other candidate spoke was due to not having any relevant input to Helene's interview topics.”

What nonsense!

Just because someone is miked does not mean they have been invited to interupt the proceedings whenever they wish.

Someone may be miked in case the presenter wants to ask them a question but it certainly doesn't give them carte blanche to stick their oar in whenever they happen to feel like it.

It's amazing and, from the point of our educations system rather sad, that some people seem to unable to tell the difference between a Q & A session such as YF and a debate.
Spitney Brears
19-06-2008
To me, Lucinda was only there to promote herself and was never interested in becoming Sir Alan's apprentice.

She was very antagonistic and when she noticed people who may object to her attitude she did everything she could to bring out the worst in them. I doubt her self-promotion has worked though because already people are starting to see her for what she is - her media career is already over.
jjackson42
19-06-2008
Originally Posted by Spitney Brears:
“To me, Lucinda was only there to promote herself and was never interested in becoming Sir Alan's apprentice.

She was very antagonistic and when she noticed people who may object to her attitude she did everything she could to bring out the worst in them. I doubt her self-promotion has worked though because already people are starting to see her for what she is - her media career is already over.”

So not a fan then??
Katenutzs
19-06-2008
Originally Posted by brangdon:
“We've pretty much established in other threads that Helene didn't get the training.

My theory is that the true situation was too complex for Raef to explain. Especially as Lucinda was wrong. I don't think she'd have been quick to understand or accept it.”

I think Raef was in a difficult situation and read it correctly. He probaly knew Lucinda was the only one to get full training but that Helene and himself were around

Originally Posted by Spitney Brears:
“To me, Lucinda was only there to promote herself and was never interested in becoming Sir Alan's apprentice.

She was very antagonistic and when she noticed people who may object to her attitude she did everything she could to bring out the worst in them. I doubt her self-promotion has worked though because already people are starting to see her for what she is - her media career is already over.”

I think Lucinda thought she had won everyone over with playing the victim and that she could more or less say what she liked without backlash ... she read it wrong

Originally Posted by Sara Webb:
“Good heavens. That brings new meaning to the phrase "damning with faint praise"!!”

No it is seeing the positive and the negative side of a candidate. Some look through rose tinted glasses others look only for bad thing and others look at the whole picture
jjackson42
19-06-2008
Originally Posted by Katenutzs:
“I think Lucinda thought she had won everyone over with playing the victim and that she could more or less say what she liked without backlash ... she read it wrong
”

Backlash??? A "Backlash" on DS does not constitute a backlash in real life.

DS exists purely as an entertainment forum for disaffected souls like your good self, and occasionally me, to winge!!

It has NO, repeat NO meaning in the great wide world out there.
ForeverBeret
19-06-2008
Someone having a 20 second argument in public is not grounds for a backlash. If it weren't for half a dozen or so posters who still seem inexplicably to feel personally violated by the incident over a week later, I doubt anyone would still be commenting on it.
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map