|
||||||||
Kate Lawler has a BIG challenge... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
|
Quote:
Originally posted by alison z Comparing Kate to Jade is completely irrelevant.It's going to make all those that said Kate would disappear very quickly after BB3 (and that Jade would be the big winner) really sick... Let me see... Kate: One year on...Signed up to present the new revamped version of Top of the Pops and a weekly Sunday radio show on Capital FM, not to mention the C4 breakfast show RI:SE... Jade: One year on...Last seen on TV Feb 2003 on "Celeb Driving school", where she didn't even turn up for the final on Comic Relief night and selling her story to NOW "My bloke has 2 timed me" - if she's done anything else recently on TV, I stand corrected... Go luck Kate you've got your work cut out for you on TOTP.. But TOTP may be a loss cause,... Saying that Kate has had more opportunities than Jade isn't great criteria for getting a presenting job. You have to compare Kate with other TV presenters that have some talent at presenting. If they're in such a desperate position to consider Kate's application by comparing her presenting talents with the bloke down the road who is a streetsweeper,....well yes, then fair enough,..if that's all the competition there is for the job,..give her the gig. ...Otherwise,.at least give the chance to somebody who can at least recognise the most common figures of speech that everybody uses. It's moments like these that everybody in the RI:SE studio suddenly looks at Kate in despair. Example,...a few weeks ago Iain Lee referred to the events around 9/11.... Kate,..."What's 9/11?".............Yes,..she actually said that. That would have been bad enough,...but to make herself look even sillier, when she said it, she shaked her head, and pulled a face at Iain like he was saying something very strange. She does this nearly every day,..Iain Lee is just speaking normally,..and Kate pulls a face at something that is said, that is common knowledge...attempting to demean Iain in the process....Silly girl. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,554
|
Cringeworthily embarrassing.
Strangely enough, Kate doesn't seem to find it as embarrassing as you or I would if we made a gaffe of that magnitude on national TV. They say ignorance is bliss - Kate seems to think ignorance is cute. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Andi Peters is one of the worst things to come out of childrens/yoof tv over the last 15 years (and his buddy Mrs daughter of fairy liquid nicey nice Nanette Newman etc). Andi likes Gary Barlow, Cameron etc. Quite nippy too. Having Andi Peters in charge of yoof tv is like saying John Craven had youth credibility when he did Newsround. Who can forget when they played the top 10 on odious swapshop and Noel asked John what was his fav top 10 song. His reply was "dont cry for me Argentina".
I like Kate but I think she will be a complete turkey at ToTP. Whoever hired Andi peters will be under scrutiny at the Beeb once Kate starts presenting ToTP.
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,148
|
Quote:
Originally posted by lulu g I only have one word to say - Visssssscount.
Cringeworthily embarrassing. Strangely enough, Kate doesn't seem to find it as embarrassing as you or I would if we made a gaffe of that magnitude on national TV. They say ignorance is bliss - Kate seems to think ignorance is cute. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,148
|
Kate, the new Jade with pelmet skirt and connections - well, Andi Peters anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 76,821
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Alrightmate Doubtless all trueExample,...a few weeks ago Iain Lee referred to the events around 9/11.... Kate,..."What's 9/11?".............Yes,..she actually said that. That would have been bad enough,...but to make herself look even sillier, when she said it, she shaked her head, and pulled a face at Iain like he was saying something very strange. She does this nearly every day,..Iain Lee is just speaking normally,..and Kate pulls a face at something that is said, that is common knowledge...attempting to demean Iain in the process....Silly girl. However............. I don't like Kate for her knowledge of world events or her ability to imitate the cloned TV presenters churned out by Media Studies and honed by the BBC Training School. If that is what you want there are thousands of them out there.They are ten a penny, competant but interchangeable and basically dull. I wouldn't have my newsreaders and TV journalists any other way. There is no point trying to compare Kate with them, she isn't one of them Kate has no talent. By virtue of winning a TV gameshow she has had some oppotunites shoved in front of her. She's grabbed at them, showing tons of hutzpah and give-it-a-go mentality. This is what i like about her. Well that and the fact that she she is a flirty young attractive blonde girl People saying that she's bad at it or dumb or whatever else FMs come up with is irrelevant - it's the having a go that I admire. Phew, this is hard work, this liking people business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,554
|
I also have no talent for TV presenting. Would you admire me if I had a go at it, or would you think, Why doesn't she stick to something she knows she can do? Or would it depend on the colour of my hair?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: cardiff
Posts: 970
|
I hate to say it but although she's pretty crap on RISE I think she might be okay on TOTPs, I don't know why I have this feeling, From the bits of RISE I watched when Jon was on I got the impression she is a fan of music and is fairly knowlegable on it. RISE, news issues etc are just 'over her head' (too complicated for her to debate) The clipboard thing doesn't help as it makes everything stunted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 76,821
|
Quote:
Originally posted by lulu g But you wouldn't though, lulu, and neither would II also have no talent for TV presenting. Would you admire me if I had a go at it................ If someone offered me the choice of presenting a live two hour TV programme next Monday or spending two hours in the dentist's chair I'd pick the dentist And I guess you would too
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,554
|
Well, you've got me there. Appearing on TV (in any context whatsoever) and going to the dentist are my two worst nightmares, so it would be a tough choice for me. Not so for Ms Lawler, though. She would sell her granny for two seconds on TV. Therefore, 'giving it a go', for somebody like her, is not such a big deal as it would be for you or me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: cardiff
Posts: 970
|
Quote:
Originally posted by swingaleg Bad example to give (dentist) I'd do just about anything to avoid going to the dentist.
But you wouldn't though, lulu, and neither would I If someone offered me the choice of presenting a live two hour TV programme next Monday or spending two hours in the dentist's chair I'd pick the dentist And I guess you would too
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 76,821
|
Quote:
Originally posted by lulu g There's a first time for everything, luluWell, you've got me there......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
|
Quote:
Originally posted by swingaleg
Doubtless all true However............. I don't like Kate for her knowledge of world events or her ability to imitate the cloned TV presenters churned out by Media Studies and honed by the BBC Training School. If that is what you want there are thousands of them out there.They are ten a penny, competant but interchangeable and basically dull. I wouldn't have my newsreaders and TV journalists any other way. Well,.no. I'm not saying that's what I want at all. But the type of person you describe......is Kate without the training. She's arguably quite dull,...and is just another example of the type of clone you describe,..but without having had any training. There is no point trying to compare Kate with them, she isn't one of them Well I'm not comparing her with any particular type of presenter whatsoever. You were the one who brought up that alternative example. But if you have people applying for a job,..are you saying that you don't compare the merits of each individual candidate? Are you saying that if she just turns up applying for the job,..she should just get it, without looking at anybody else? Kate has no talent. By virtue of winning a TV gameshow she has had some oppotunites shoved in front of her. She's grabbed at them, showing tons of hutzpah and give-it-a-go mentality. This is what i like about her. Well that and the fact that she she is a flirty young attractive blonde girl I agree, and I think she's done well by going for it. Unfortunately it might not be enough. People saying that she's bad at it or dumb or whatever else FMs come up with is irrelevant - it's the having a go that I admire. Why is it irrelevant? If we as viewers think she's bad,...and she continually proves herself to be bad,...then our views are relevant as the public are the ones watching TOTP. The public's views have to be extremely relevant, I would have thought. Yes,..having a go is good. But If the viewing ratings for TOTP continue to nosedive, how much are they going to care about that? I doubt that if TOTP eventually gets cancelled due to getting crapper than ever,.that the producers are going to console themselves by saying,... "Yes,..but we let a talentless wannabe <have a go>,..we've at least got that to fall back on" "Shouldn't we have just hired Cat Deeley, or somebody like that?" "No we did the right thing,..we let somebody <have a go>, that's all that matters." Phew, this is hard work, this liking people business. Why should it be? Are you saying you like her?....If you are, then it doesn't matter if she does the TOTP job or not. I think most of us here are talking more about whether she's got the necessary abilities for the job in hand.....Liking her, doesn't really come into it with me. She seems to have the drive,...but I feel that she has to somehow improve if her career is to progress. I quite like her on RI:SE,...but I recognise that she can be horrendously bad a lot of the time. Doesn't spoil my enjoyment of RI:SE....I can enjoy it quite a lot....No problem with Kate doing it. But Kate simply isn't that good,..and I don't think she's going to add anything of much merit to TOTP. If TOTP is doing badly,...I can't see the sense of introducing another bad element to it. If TOTP is in a rut,...I can't really see how employing Kate is a major solution to their problems. In presenter led type shows,...good presenters are probably the most important element. Last edited by Alrightmate : 18-08-2003 at 00:08. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,514
|
Quote:
Originally posted by swingaleg Get lost Swing....That's the same argument royal family lovers come out with when they try to make out being royalty is horrible and say "Well, I'd never swap with them"....But you wouldn't though, lulu, and neither would I If someone offered me the choice of presenting a live two hour TV programme next Monday or spending two hours in the dentist's chair I'd pick the dentist And I guess you would too
I'd be in that TV studio like a shot....and unlike Kate I'd do my own research..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,554
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mesostim In fairness to swing, I should say that he was addressing me and he was absolutely right in that I would rather pull out all my toenails one by one than appear on TV (or, for that matter, be a member of the Royal Family). However, as you rightly point out, Mes, not everyone feels as I do about that. I have no doubt you could run rings round Kate, given half a chance.
Get lost Swing....That's the same argument royal family lovers come out with when they try to make out being royalty is horrible and say "Well, I'd never swap with them".... I'd be in that TV studio like a shot....and unlike Kate I'd do my own research..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
|
Quote:
Originally posted by lulu g Yes, as you say, whether you or Swingaleg turned down a presenting job,..really is irrelevant...In fairness to swing, I should say that he was addressing me and he was absolutely right in that I would rather pull out all my toenails one by one than appear on TV (or, for that matter, be a member of the Royal Family). However, as you rightly point out, Mes, not everyone feels as I do about that. I have no doubt you could run rings round Kate, given half a chance. ...As thousands upon thousands would jump at the chance to "have a go". I might have a go,....and I'd probably be shit too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 76,821
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mesostim Not the same argument at all. Get lost Swing....That's the same argument royal family lovers come out with when they try to make out being royalty is horrible and say "Well, I'd never swap with them".... I'd be in that TV studio like a shot....and unlike Kate I'd do my own research..... If the job of Monarch was up for grabs I might admire people who had a shot, particularly those with no previous reigning experience, for their have-a-go attitude. That would be the same argument |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,554
|
The difference is you know it, AM. If you did get the chance and you kept making monumentally embarrassing gaffes, à la Kate, how long would it take you to realize you didn't have what it takes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
|
Quote:
Originally posted by lulu g Knowing myself,....I would try and get good advice from those around me to find out what I'm doing right, and what I'm doing wrong.The difference is you know it, AM. If you did get the chance and you kept making monumentally embarrassing gaffes, à la Kate, how long would it take you to realize you didn't have what it takes? I'm very critical of myself,...so I hope that I could put my finger on mistakes that I would be making very quickly. As Mesostim hinted on,...I'd try and find out what works and what doesn't. Try and pinpoint what seperates, the good from the bad,..and the good from the great. I'd work on my weaknesses. But I'd have to accept, that maybe I wouldn't be best suited for that particular type of work. So to answer your question,....I think I'd get to know quite quickly, once I'd established what my own attributes and weaknesses are. It does appear that Kate isn't really being self critical, as she's just not getting better. I remember Sandy saying that people just didn't care about the little things, and were just clambering over each other in pursuit of fame and fortune. They were ignoring little things like contracts as they were blinded by their own objectives. It seems that more people only care about the fame,...and not so much as to whether they're actually any good at their job. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Over the rainbow then over the hills and far away....
Posts: 2,411
|
I love a good debate
I liked Kate on BB3 and glad she won it, yes she is lightweight, at times very lightweight, but let's face facts she's made it... Exactly why she's made it apart from being pretty and winning BB3 is anybodies guess... but i'm sure you will enlighten me Mind you having connections seems to work... look at Gareth Gates Sister! |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 76,821
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Alrightmate I'm not under any illusion that Kate is good at the job. I don't watch RI:SE but the evidence as presented on here by FMs that do watch it is that she's crap and I'm happy to believe them.Yes, as you say, whether you or Swingaleg turned down a presenting job,..really is irrelevant... ...As thousands upon thousands would jump at the chance to "have a go". I might have a go,....and I'd probably be shit too. As you say there are thousands that would jump at the chance to have a go and she is one that has actually done it If you or Mes were to post on here that you had been offerred the chance to present RI:SE next Monday and had taken up the offer, I would admire you for that, irrepective of wether you subsequently turned out to be any good at the job I like Kate for taking the chance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
|
Quote:
Originally posted by alison z No,...lets face facts,...she hasn't made it.I love a good debate I liked Kate on BB3 and glad she won it, yes she is lightweight, at times very lightweight, but let's face facts she's made it... Exactly why she's made it apart from being pretty and winning BB3 is anybodies guess... but i'm sure you will enlighten me Winning BB3? Mind you having connections seems to work... look at Gareth Gates Sister! The reason I say this is hardly anybody has made it. There must be about 90% of celebrities who are struggling to keep theirr head above water in the fame game at any given time. Most people acheive a level of fame for about two or three years,..then fade away to obscurity again. Kate's only made it to a certain level. Even presenters like Tess Daly are working hard to maintain their level of fame,...if she gets complacent,..she will fade away like oh so many others. I'd say that you've only made it,..when you have managed to sustain a TV career over many years. I'd say that celebs like Cilla Black, Chris Tarrant and Bruce Forsythe are ones that you could maybe say have made it. When you can attain this kind of level of celebrity,..you can probably afford to be off our TV screens for two, three, maybe even four or five years,..and the public would readily accept them again. If Kate is off our screen for too long,..she would find it very dificult to land a TV presenting job again with her diminishing BB status leaving her as just another also ran in our memories. People like Kate Lawler, or Brian Dowling are on a pretty low rung on the fame ladder. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I think ToTP, either the hosts have to project coolness or else project the idea they are having a great time and you should be here etc and also they should be quick thinkers etc. It doesnt matter to me if they arent very good at presenting (they are only on screen briefly while on ToTP and not very important on it) but usually with presenters, people dont much notice them unless they are really bad (like Jerry Hall unable to talk and listen to the producer through her earpiece or read the autocue etc)
I get the feeling Kate will be like a rabbit in headlights and possibly fluff her lines etc. I like Kate so good on her anyway. She cant miss the opportunity. She is looking nice and slim in that pic altho she looks a bit TOO think to me. Im amazed people watch ToTP anyway.Next people will be saying they still listen to the 2 hour chart show on a Sunday (despite the fact they probably hate 99% of the songs in the chart ).
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,554
|
Quote:
Originally posted by swingaleg Fair enough. I would admire her more if, having had a go, she recognized her own limitations and retired gracefully to do something more suited to her talents (whatever they may be I'm not under any illusion that Kate is good at the job. I don't watch RI:SE but the evidence as presented on here by FMs that do watch it is that she's crap and I'm happy to believe them. As you say there are thousands that would jump at the chance to have a go and she is one that has actually done it If you or Mes were to post on here that you had been offerred the chance to present RI:SE next Monday and had taken up the offer, I would admire you for that, irrepective of wether you subsequently turned out to be any good at the job I like Kate for taking the chance. ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Over the rainbow then over the hills and far away....
Posts: 2,411
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Alrightmate Alrightmate i love your posts!No,...lets face facts,...she hasn't made it. The reason I say this is hardly anybody has made it. There must be about 90% of celebrities who are struggling to keep theirr head above water in the fame game at any given time. You clearly have a passion about Kate... I agree with you It's like the Fame Academy students or Big Brother HM's or Pop Idol hopefull's who think by being on TV, they have "made it" they've got the TV exposure, but they haven't made it.. Yes they may have got their foot in the door, but their job is keeping it in there... Of course Kate hasn't made it when you compare them to Brucie or Cilla, only Ant & Dec from this generation could even get near to them... In fact i'd widen it and say that Brucie & Cilla are at the mercy of TV executives half their age and a quarter of their "talent". If their faces fit and they can pull a audience they will be on TV, if not you'll find them at home counting there money... Look at Benny Hill or Jimmy Tarbuck.... everybody in the biz has to keep working and on their toes... Even more so the Kate's of this world... But for the moment in her own small "Here today gone tomorrow" TV World.. Kate has made it... |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:08.




Strangely enough, Kate doesn't seem to find it as embarrassing as you or I would if we made a gaffe of that magnitude on national TV. They say ignorance is bliss - Kate seems to think ignorance is cute.
).