• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
WARNING ! OK Magazine !!!
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
EddyBee
20-08-2003
Just a little word of warning for those of you of a nervous disposition or suffering from a heart ailments or a breathing difficulty...

OK magazine is full of photos of that dastardly duo, aka as Alison & Kate posing away for the camera. Fake ear to ear grins, fake fun poses, fake dancing with their huge mouths wide open for some reason and fake 'lovey' cuddles with people that they have obviously just met. Rather like re-living BB3 !

Poor Lee & Sophie's big day was clearly hijacked by these two buffoons and turned into some kind of Club 18 to 30 event.

PS - The good news is that Alex , apart from in the main wedding photo, is not to be seen with either of these two idiots in any of the other photographs.

PPS - Kate's make-up prepared by Coco the Clown as usual. Kate a couple of sizes too big for her top.

(More Later)
Darklight
20-08-2003
looks like OK is giving the public what it wants, more pictures of Kate.
as ever thanks for the mini review eejay.

How many photos was Alex in?
How many photos was Kate in?
EddyBee
20-08-2003
Alex never play acted for the cameras & he will certainly not start now in order to compete with a couple of buffoons.
ben4321
20-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Eejay


OK magazine is full of photos of that dastardly duo, aka as Alison & Kate posing away for the camera. Fake ear to ear grins, fake fun poses, fake dancing with their huge mouths wide open for some reason and fake 'lovey' cuddles with people that they have obviously just met. Rather like re-living BB3 !
”

"We're the Fame twins!" Ugh....
EddyBee
20-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by ben4321
"We're the Fame twins!" Ugh.... ”

Thanks for the memory. Yes, something like that ! There is not one shot of either one of those two with a sincere, honest expression. Just a load of fake smiles & exaggerated postures.
anon2
20-08-2003
Thanks for the info Eejay, it comes out here tomorrow so I will get my copy then I hope.

How many photos of Alex - the taster on Rex showed him in a raaather nice suit and shirt, not seen them before.........

Feel a bit sorry for Lee and Sophie for the obvious commercialisation of the wedding, OK maybe they shouldn't have agreed to the mag and documentary deals but it must have been tempting, however with all those BB folks there that they didn't really know, I hope they didn't regret it.

One thing I think we can say for sure is that Alex was invited as a friend (he is in regular contact with Lee) a considerable time in advance, the same for Kate, she has kept in touch with Sophie.
OK maybe even Alison and PJ......not sure.......
These were not there for the ligging but I have doubts about the others, I mean how can the couple know Justine etc?
I hope it didn't spoil their special day.
thenetworkbabe
21-08-2003
.

PS - The good news is that Alex , apart from in the main wedding photo, is not to be seen with either of these two idiots in any of the other photographs.

Unfortunately this, somewhat unobjective, review misses the rather more important point for Alex fans that he is only in 2 shots of the bride and groom - in one its them plus Alex and Kate standing to either side of the happy couple (an interesting choice of people) and in the other its a group BB1-4 photo with Alex and Kate in the same places - Alex also turns up in one with the cousin of the groom. Alex isn't seen with anyone from BB except in those 2 group photos - there are pictures, however, of lots of other people as well as Kate and Alison. Sophie and Craig, Sissy and Jon, PJ and Justine and PJ's brother (who has hair) plus Alison and Stuart, Kate and PJ and Sophie and Alison.[

I think the BB4 people were on RISE the weeks Sophie and Lee were on which may be the answer to Anon2's question. How they know Narinder and Bubble isn't so obvious.
EddyBee
21-08-2003
You miss the point !

Alex, and the other ex-HMs, look like proper wedding guests. Sincere, honest expressions on their faces, no fake 'we are partying' poses for the cameras etc. Take a look for yourselves folks.
BIGe4BROTHER
21-08-2003
Quote:
“Take a look for yourselves folks”

probably in 2 years time when i am waiting at the doctors surgery.
Emzi
21-08-2003
Just had a quick look at OK!

It's a bloody awful set of pictures for a start!! Everything looks a bit sort of dark and not very glossy. Oh dear. Leave the SLR at home Mr Photographer Man?

Alex's Angels will be pleased to know that there is a full page length shot of Kate and Alex either side of the happy couple at the start of the article. Alex is wearing a suit -dark with tiny stripes. Kate is wearing a halterneck pale gold top and black trousers. She looks like she's about to go to Anne Summers party not a wedding.

But there are more horror as you read on - Sissy attended to wedding in jeans - she looks as if she's just got out of bed. Sophie crying at the alter (I'd be crying if The Fame Twins were at my wedding too Soph) There is a shot of BB2's Stuart and BB3's Alison (both pulling faces) that makes you wish you were dead.

Bubble, Crag and Stuart seem to be having some sort of Mr Horrible Shirt competition.

Further on - shot of Sophie and Lee cutting the cake - few uninteresting shots of Jon (smiling and in a suit as usual) and co at the reception.

Sophie's dress and bouquet are lovely (as is the cake) but the tiara makes her look like she belongs on a christmas tree.

The wedding article starts on page 45 (????). But here's the irony - flick back about 20 pages or so to back page 25 (rough guesses!!) and what do you get?

***A double page colour exclusive of Jade being papped as she drinks chocolate milk and tends to her baby son with a few friends on plastic chairs outside a cafe!!!!!! ***
darling
21-08-2003
I'm going to buy OK later today obviously, but I've just noticed from all these accounts that there's someone missing!

Where's Jonny?

I bet he waited until the party in the evening so that he could make a big entrance for himself.

The tosser!
piranhaville
21-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by darling
Where's Jonny?
”

Prior engagement at Tan-a-Penny or rehearsing for Bouffant the Hairstyle Tamer.
Emzi
21-08-2003
Soz - Jade's pics are on pages 27,28 and the Lee and Sophie Wedding pics start on page 44 of OK!, Jade is also on the front cover of Hotstars - the mag inside OK!.

I scanned though the numerous mags in the shop this morning and I can't remember which one - but one of the headlines was "Jade fights to save marriage". This isn't the first time the tabbies, glossies and trash-mags have referred to Jade's marriage.

I doubt Jade has married - there has never even been an official engagement annoucement/photoshoot (something soaps/pop stars seem to do every week to get their hands on extra dosh from rags Suranne Jones, Jennifer Ellison, most of S Club etc etc etc etc etc etc).


So why do they keep referring to Jade as being married???

emzi
(would sell her own kidneys to attend Jade's wedding Sod J-Lo and Ben - Jade and Jeff would be the event of the year! )
peppie
21-08-2003
Jon looked very smart which is more than I can say for Bubble wtf did he get that shirt!
Elderflower
21-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by peppie
Jon looked very smart which is more than I can say for Bubble wtf did he get that shirt! ”

Yes Jon did look smart, as befitting a wedding guest but as for Bubble, Oxfam?
Darklight
21-08-2003
The two shots of Kate and Allison are unbelievable cheesy. It is a sign of Kate's loyalty to her friend and her media "awareness", that she would put herself in this position to give Allison some much needed publicity. Personally I think Kate does herself no favours by being associated with this woman, but when you are as big as Kate you can safely do this sort of thing.

Has Alex been unwell recently? He looked a bit tired and drawn. It's like his sparkle has been dimmed, like he has no direction or intent. I hope nothing is troubling him.

I'm surprised that Lee (or indeed Sophie) didn't kick out some of the guests (Bubble/Stuart), they were just taking the piss.
lulu g
21-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by DEADDOG
The two shots of Kate and Allison are unbelievable cheesy. It is a sign of Kate's loyalty to her friend and her media "awareness", that she would put herself in this position to give Allison some much needed publicity. Personally I think Kate does herself no favours by being associated with this woman, but when you are as big as Kate you can safely do this sort of thing. ...”

The woman is a saint.
Susann
21-08-2003
I couldn't believe it when I opened my OK magazine, and there were Stuart Allison and kate, with a total lack of decorum at the wedding, playing up to the cameras again.

And the way some of them were dressed, to me it showed a total lack of respect for Sophie and Lee on their wedding day. Trinny and Susannah would have had a field day with some of those guests.

Alex looked gorgeous as usual and Jon didn't look too bad either.
lulu g
21-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Susann
I couldn't believe it when I opened my OK magazine, and there were Stuart Allison and kate, with a total lack of decorum at the wedding, playing up to the cameras again. ... ”

Old habits die hard, Susann. There's something about a camera that brings out the worst in some people.
Johnson
21-08-2003
When I first saw the pictures, I thought why did Lee and Sophie invite a DIRTY HOMELESS TRAMP to the wedding? but then I realised it was just Alex. However, I was disapppointed he wasn't wearing his trade-mark dirty red jacket.

I assume the reason why Alex is not pictured socialising with any of the other housemate, is because the other housemates did not want to be associated with such a loser.
Johnson
21-08-2003
Isn't it wonderful to see the pictorial editor of OK, placing more pictures of Kate in the piece than the 'happy couple'.
anon2
21-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Johnson
When I first saw the pictures, I thought why did Lee and Sophie invite a DIRTY HOMELESS TRAMP to the wedding? but then I realised it was just Alex. However, I was disapppointed he wasn't wearing his trade-mark dirty red jacket.

I assume the reason why Alex is not pictured socialising with any of the other housemate, is because the other housemates did not want to be associated with such a loser.
”

What a horrible post!

Most who have seen the pics would surely agree that Alex is wearing a gorgeous suit and rather nice shirt, he and Jon made an effort and really look the part, very smart.

I would say that the reason Alex is not pictured larking around is that he is decent enough to recognise that it was actually Lee and Sophie's wedding and behave as such, not a cheap photo-opportunity.
Susann
21-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by anon2
What a horrible post!

Most who have seen the pics would surely agree that Alex is wearing a gorgeous suit and rather nice shirt, he and Jon made an effort and really look the part, very smart.

I would say that the reason Alex is not pictured larking around is that he is decent enough to recognise that it was actually Lee and Sophie's wedding and behave as such, not a cheap photo-opportunity.
”

Maybe Johnson is envious that Alex and Jon know how to behave at a wedding and as you say not use it as a cheap photo shoot, unlike Kate and Allison.

If it makes Johnson feel better in her/himself to do an uncalled for character assassination on Alex, then let them get on with it. I just don't have the time or energy anymore for those kind of nasty posts. It speaks more about the poster than anything else.
Johnson
21-08-2003
Let me get this right. I'm the jealous one.

Aren't you lot the pathetic housewives who are so jealous of Kate, that you've set up permanant residence on this forum just to spill your vile jealousy towards her.
Elle
21-08-2003
Was this a real life wedding or a television one?
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map