the same old story.
i wasn't surprised at all that we ended up losing. as i've mentioned earlier in the
thread we're a team that can create chances but cannot score or put teams away
when we are on top and a team that is incapable of defending well for 90 minutes
on a consistent basis.
Burley has tried different players, different tactics, different formations but the
same thing keeps happening over and over again. we have conceded 24 of our 37 goals in the second half and too many times have thrown away either a winning
or drawing position in the second half. and yet the second half is when the
manager usually makes changes whether subs or tactics etc but its the second
half that's killing us. what does that tell you?
i wasn't surprised at all that we ended up losing. as i've mentioned earlier in the
thread we're a team that can create chances but cannot score or put teams away
when we are on top and a team that is incapable of defending well for 90 minutes
on a consistent basis.
Burley has tried different players, different tactics, different formations but the
same thing keeps happening over and over again. we have conceded 24 of our 37 goals in the second half and too many times have thrown away either a winning
or drawing position in the second half. and yet the second half is when the
manager usually makes changes whether subs or tactics etc but its the second
half that's killing us. what does that tell you?






