Thank you

Yes...although I'm not sure what you're saying has anything to do with whether there will be any new dances this year, which is the topic in question.

I understand that the male/female weeks were introduced when there were too many celebs to perform in one night, and also because so many female celebs were voted out at the start of series 3. I also understand that the dance-off & judges' final decision were brought in to perhaps override any dubious audience voting.

Do these format changes have anything to do with what actual dances are performed? No. Hence why some people were confused by your post.

I'm trying to understand how you made the leap in logic by suggesting that viewer input had any input into the "more dancers each year" thing, which is what we're talking about.

We're not talking about male / female weeks, judge's decisions, or other format changes. We're talking about the series inflation. Clear?

If you want to discuss other factors, find / create another thread about those. We're talking about more dances here.

So, if you can explain how "we brought more dancers on ourselves", I'd appreciate you explaining that. Because, yes, it does seem hard for some of us to understand what you're saying.

It was following on from what people were saying, complaining about the format changes, which were actually mentioned earlier in the thread, even if they weren't strictly to do with the title, such is the nature of discussion.
No need to be so over-sensitive/picky.

OK, so you weren't referring to the more dancers thing, then.

Cool, thanks for clearing that one up.


Not picky, just confused. As were a few others.

So either we're all very stupid, or you weren't exactly clear.