Originally Posted by cathrin:
“I rewatched this episode on BBC3 last night, and thoroughly enjoyed it. But that line really jarred on me, when the Dalek said something to the Doctor about "saving the woman you love." It just didn't feel right.
Firstly, because Rose seems so young in this series, very much a teenage girl [as she's meant to be], so it doesn't seem right referring to her as a "woman" and linking her romantically with Christopher Ecclestone's incarnation of the Doctor, who is, after all, about 40ish.
Secondly, it just seems a bit premature. The Doctor and Rose haven't known each other long at this stage, and there's no real evidence of "love" between them, just a nice matey friendship between a 19-year old girl and a much older man. And that's as it should be, surely? I never really got a sense of a romantic attachment between them until David Tennant became the Doctor....only then did it really become believable and/or acceptable that there could be anything more than friendship between them.
I remember getting a similar feeling of "hang on, slow down" when Martha started going all gooey about the Doctor in Gridlock, and talking about him as if she'd been in love with him for ages. It just didn't seem right to go so OTT with all the love stuff so soon, when they'd only been together for a couple of episodes! (Some would say, of course, that maybe it's *never* right to go OTT on the love stuff in DW!)
It'll be interesting to see how they pitch the relationship with the next companion. Catherine Tate had it just right IMO, and she made a welcome change after all the emotional stuff from Rose and Martha. How are they going to get it right next time?”
“I rewatched this episode on BBC3 last night, and thoroughly enjoyed it. But that line really jarred on me, when the Dalek said something to the Doctor about "saving the woman you love." It just didn't feel right.
Firstly, because Rose seems so young in this series, very much a teenage girl [as she's meant to be], so it doesn't seem right referring to her as a "woman" and linking her romantically with Christopher Ecclestone's incarnation of the Doctor, who is, after all, about 40ish.
Secondly, it just seems a bit premature. The Doctor and Rose haven't known each other long at this stage, and there's no real evidence of "love" between them, just a nice matey friendship between a 19-year old girl and a much older man. And that's as it should be, surely? I never really got a sense of a romantic attachment between them until David Tennant became the Doctor....only then did it really become believable and/or acceptable that there could be anything more than friendship between them.
I remember getting a similar feeling of "hang on, slow down" when Martha started going all gooey about the Doctor in Gridlock, and talking about him as if she'd been in love with him for ages. It just didn't seem right to go so OTT with all the love stuff so soon, when they'd only been together for a couple of episodes! (Some would say, of course, that maybe it's *never* right to go OTT on the love stuff in DW!)
It'll be interesting to see how they pitch the relationship with the next companion. Catherine Tate had it just right IMO, and she made a welcome change after all the emotional stuff from Rose and Martha. How are they going to get it right next time?”
You could tell from the 3rd episode they loved each other. They were about to die and all they could say was they were glad they met each other.




(It even went to great lengths to restore it's outward appearance, making sure its bumps were all neat!
)
”
but that doesnt mean there cant be a subtext to one or two of his companions relationships. - Ok that makes little sense.
