Originally Posted by njp:
“You must be thinking of DCC...
Minidiscs are random access, non-contact storage media - so they were, for a short while, a superior alternative to tape. I don't know why anyone would now favour them over hard drive or flash based storage in a choice of file formats and bitrates.”
“You must be thinking of DCC...
Minidiscs are random access, non-contact storage media - so they were, for a short while, a superior alternative to tape. I don't know why anyone would now favour them over hard drive or flash based storage in a choice of file formats and bitrates.”
i meant the functionality in use. it had the potential to be the first "mp3" player, but sony kicked itself in the teeth by reducing functionality to that of an analog cassette player/recorder.
Originally Posted by digibod:
“er no, tapes snapped, had drop outs and the longer record time, the quality suffered
i can get 4 80 minute cds on one minidisc without any loss of quality
i think its a great format”
“er no, tapes snapped, had drop outs and the longer record time, the quality suffered
i can get 4 80 minute cds on one minidisc without any loss of quality
i think its a great format”
yea but what matters was that for the longest time it recorded at 1x!!! so recording 4 80 minute cds into minidiscs would have taken you at the very least if you had every cd stacked and ready 5 and a half hours.
and i guess you are thinking of the extra long play compression that came along later on ...and that came at a cost of sound quality. nothings free. and of course even after they allowed pc connection it was sonic stage crippled. any improvements came too late.
sony had the chance to make it pc compatible and then play mp3s from day one. but they just couldn't,they were just too scared and they blew it. perhaps md hung on longer in the uk, but by the time they started netmd stuff they were long dead in the states from all the stupid restrictions.
and well now that flash players are out with 32gb...theres really no point to md anymore. and thats fine.
Originally Posted by hardylane:
“This is, unfortunately, garbage.
Minidiscs remain superb sound quality, and better than most MP3s.
I don't use them anymore, but they were groundbreaking.
I hate it when technosnobs try and diss great technology based on a lack of information.”
“This is, unfortunately, garbage.
Minidiscs remain superb sound quality, and better than most MP3s.
I don't use them anymore, but they were groundbreaking.
I hate it when technosnobs try and diss great technology based on a lack of information.”
i doubt you'd pass a high bitrate lame encoded vs attrac blind test. and of course there are even lossless formats for mp3 players these days so the gripes are really without merit. if you complain about ipods sound quality, other makes such as cowin samsung creative...and yes sony walkman have better output. i have a 728 walkman myself. judging mp3 sound with an ipod is not a good idea to say the least.
theres no snobbery, just a massive lost opportunity, they had a window of a decade that they could have owned and they turned it down. i didn't buy into minidisc because i didn't approve of their mentality of crippling products out of fear of piracy. and they really really crippled their early md units.
i didn't buy a walkman until they ditched sonic stage, and they have with the 72x/82x units.



