Should we have a regular reporter appearing on Breakfast, as per Karen Hardy last season?
Should Karen keep the job?
Any suggestions?
It would need to be someone able to put together a decent 5-minute piece each week (might rule out a few pros).
Would they need a knowledge of previous series? ie: Would any of the new pros be suitable, or not?
Perhaps it should be someone who's not likely to last in the main show for very long (as per Karen last year).
Ian Waite (my preferred optioin) made a very good impression whenever he was on ITT last season. But, unless there's a shock eviction, he ought to last in the main show for a while.
Or would it be better to have different pros reviewing the program on Breakfast each week, in the same way that different pros did the red-button-commentary, and the "behind the scenes" clips for ITT?
Should Karen keep the job?
Any suggestions?
It would need to be someone able to put together a decent 5-minute piece each week (might rule out a few pros).
Would they need a knowledge of previous series? ie: Would any of the new pros be suitable, or not?
Perhaps it should be someone who's not likely to last in the main show for very long (as per Karen last year).
Ian Waite (my preferred optioin) made a very good impression whenever he was on ITT last season. But, unless there's a shock eviction, he ought to last in the main show for a while.
Or would it be better to have different pros reviewing the program on Breakfast each week, in the same way that different pros did the red-button-commentary, and the "behind the scenes" clips for ITT?