|
||||||||
Too many Couples |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,880
|
Too many Couples
Why do we need so many couples ? It will just get boring after so many weeks of watching so many people do the same dance . I think it should be ten couples every year. Also it will run out of celebs after this year
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: No idea.
Posts: 9,353
|
Bored? Never.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Anywhere there's chocolate
Posts: 560
|
Erm, methinks you're in the wrong forum, Alistair!
![]() I personally think they should have 52 couples, ten judges, a 100 piece orchestra, stage it at Wembley stadium so we can ALL go every week for ever and ever, not forgetting the Red Arrows fly past and pots of Haagen Daas handed round freely. But that's just me, of course, don't know that many others on here would agree. Oh, and an unlimited supply of Ripples, obviously!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: N. Ireland
Posts: 1,049
|
Quote:
Erm, methinks you're in the wrong forum, Alistair!
![]() I personally think they should have 52 couples, ten judges, a 100 piece orchestra, stage it at Wembley stadium so we can ALL go every week for ever and ever, not forgetting the Red Arrows fly past and pots of Haagen Daas handed round freely. But that's just me, of course, don't know that many others on here would agree. Oh, and an unlimited supply of Ripples, obviously! ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bouncing around
Posts: 20,387
|
Quote:
Erm, methinks you're in the wrong forum, Alistair!
![]() I personally think they should have 52 couples, ten judges, a 100 piece orchestra, stage it at Wembley stadium so we can ALL go every week for ever and ever, not forgetting the Red Arrows fly past and pots of Haagen Daas handed round freely. But that's just me, of course, don't know that many others on here would agree. Oh, and an unlimited supply of Ripples, obviously! ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,566
|
100 len goodman's?
*shudders* |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I love the couples and it never gets boring
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Anywhere there's chocolate
Posts: 560
|
Quote:
100 len goodman's?
*shudders* ![]() And loadsa walnut whips. And Twisteds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pembrokeshire.
Posts: 40,686
|
Quote:
Why do we need so many couples ? It will just get boring after so many weeks of watching so many people do the same dance . I think it should be ten couples every year. Also it will run out of celebs after this year
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stalking David and Neal
Posts: 38,045
|
Quote:
Erm, methinks you're in the wrong forum, Alistair!
![]() I personally think they should have 52 couples, ten judges, a 100 piece orchestra, stage it at Wembley stadium so we can ALL go every week for ever and ever, not forgetting the Red Arrows fly past and pots of Haagen Daas handed round freely. But that's just me, of course, don't know that many others on here would agree. Oh, and an unlimited supply of Ripples, obviously! ![]() ![]() ETA: Just thought, we're mere days away from the first of the rumoured song choices, who's dancing what threads - Squeeee Last edited by Agent Krycek : 15-09-2008 at 14:37. Reason: ETA: More babbling really :o |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,439
|
If anyone finds it boring having more couples and a longer series, they can always switch to another channel!!!!!! For me, the more the merrier!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Nr Portsmouth
Posts: 4,597
|
Quote:
Erm, methinks you're in the wrong forum, Alistair!
![]() I personally think they should have 52 couples, ten judges, a 100 piece orchestra, stage it at Wembley stadium so we can ALL go every week for ever and ever, not forgetting the Red Arrows fly past and pots of Haagen Daas handed round freely. But that's just me, of course, don't know that many others on here would agree. Oh, and an unlimited supply of Ripples, obviously! ![]() Plus all the good looking males have to bare their chests, it would be compulsory
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
|
Quote:
Why do we need so many couples ? It will just get boring after so many weeks of watching so many people do the same dance . I think it should be ten couples every year. Also it will run out of celebs after this year
And celebs are being created every month, some come into the limelight, some leave the career which made them famous, some retire. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,572
|
It's NEVER boring!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 5,087
|
To be honest, I'd rather they went down to 12 couples. And have them all dance in the first weeks, I don't like this male/female week rubbish
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Anywhere there's chocolate
Posts: 560
|
Quote:
To be honest, I'd rather they went down to 12 couples. And have them all dance in the first weeks, I don't like this male/female week rubbish
![]() With you on the male/female rubbish - see earlier post re how many couples! ![]() Michy - I think the wardrobe ladies are working on it with Mark, judging by the preview show!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London - Gerbilophobe!
Posts: 9,091
|
Actually - why not do it the easy way - and have two series a year!!
JJ - ever the voice of reason (lol)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stalking David and Neal
Posts: 38,045
|
Quote:
Actually - why not do it the easy way - and have two series a year!!
JJ - ever the voice of reason (lol) ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 699
|
Quote:
To be honest, I'd rather they went down to 12 couples. And have them all dance in the first weeks, I don't like this male/female week rubbish
![]() I'd have preferred it if they'd reduced the number to 12 and kept everyone in until they'd done a ballroom and a latin. It gives them all a chance to get in to the series properly. It's not easy voting for someone on the basis of one dance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South London
Posts: 5,108
|
My biggest disappointment about this new series is that they, to my knowledge, are keeping that dreadful band and the wailers that goes with it.
Why can't they have a decent dance combo and get rid of those singers - they, for me, spoil the whole show. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 12,636
|
Too many definitely , 12 is quite sufficient .
Why mess with a good recipe ? Money I assume . |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,469
|
Quote:
Actually - why not do it the easy way - and have two series a year!!
2 series a year; one in Spring (Mar - June), one in Autumn (Oct-Dec). Ah, hold on, slight flaw; March - June is Doctor Who time... |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 42,423
|
Far too many couples. I watched the preview programme last Saturday and by the time they had got to the introduction of about 10 couples I was flagging and gave up on the rest of the show.
![]() Too many I thought ...... hope I don't feel the same with the actual show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 396
|
My old mum basically stays alive for SCD, but she couldn't keep up with the amount of couples on the intro programme last week. She found it was way too much crammed in and all but switched off.
Hopefully she'll find her feet with it as the weeks go by. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55.




