Originally Posted by Singy Thingy:
“...if that happens, it will explain the wildcard rumour.
It will also make Rachel a 'good example' after all...of someone who has a crap work ethic because she is so used to being handed or taking what she wants.
It will also bring about the ratings/drama she was put there for in the first place.
It WONT ruin her chances at a better life. If she doesnt take the opportunity already being unfairly handed to her on pretty much a silver platter, and use this hype/media attention to start gigging/get an agent/etc, then she will have ruined the chance herself. If she works for it,and it really IS hard work, not just xfactor type glam and performances, the chance is there.”
How is this 'unfair'? Or rather, any less unfair than it is for the rest of the final 12? She entered a competition - should people be barred from this if they are on benefits?
Rachel entered a talent competition in which she is still to prove herself.
The way you are going on (and on and on and on.....etc) about Rachel, you'd think someone had handed her an honorary PhD and that she has been asked to perform brain surgery.
It's a competition....that's all. Not becoming Prime Minister.