DS Forums

 
 

Oh dear....More stories More arguments 'yawn'


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2008, 10:50
Amy86
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 5,050

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/xfactor/v...-studio-brawl/

austin and scott nearly having a fight?

and people say rachel is bad?
Amy86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 07-10-2008, 11:09
PrincessEssex
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,366
can someone write what this is about roughly as I cannot get on the link at work
PrincessEssex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:10
robtuk06
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,425
What were they fighting over? Whos turn it is to get bummed?
robtuk06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:12
Amy86
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 5,050
[quote][/By Richard Peppiatt

X FACTOR finalists Austin Drage and Scott Bruton were pulled apart after brawling with each other in front of fellow contestants.

The pair, who are both in Simon Cowell’s 16 to 24-year-old males section, were involved in the fracas after trading insults.

Cowell, who is 49 today, has now intervened amid fears the pair’s rivalry could explode again.

A show insider said last night: “It is no secret that Austin and Scott have hated each other from the start.

“They’re both lovely guys, but when they’re in the same room there is an obvious clash of personalities.”

Grabbed

The pair squared up while working in a rehearsal studio in London with the other finalists.

The source added: “An argument started between them and in a flash they had grabbed hold of each other’s shirts and were pushing and shoving.

“It looked like they were about to throw punches but others were on hand to break them up.

GET ALL THE LATEST X FACTOR NEWS NOW!

“They then had to be held back from trying to hit each other.

“Although they’d had several verbal arguments before that, no-one had expected it to turn violent.”

It is not known if Cowell saw the incident, but he discussed it with producers and fellow judges Louis Walsh, 56, Cheryl Cole, 25, and Dannii Minogue, 36.

The insider added: “Simon may be the boss, but the other judges are desperate to win and won’t let his boys disrupt their preparations for the all-important live shows.

“It’s especially difficult, though, for Eoghan Quigg. He is only 16 and a long way from home and now he has to contend with these two older boys in his group exchanging killer looks with each other all day.

“You can cut the atmosphere with a knife and it’s detracting from the real reason they are here in the first place – the music.”

It is thought the rivalry of Essex boy Austin, 21, and Mancunian Scott, 19, stems from Austin’s friendship with Cheryl from his time supporting Girls Aloud with his old band 5boyz.

Some contestants were fuming at the revelation, claiming Austin had an advantage.

A spokesman for The X Factor said: “Austin and Scott might not be the best of friends but they’re sharing a room in the house and getting on well enough at the moment.”

Meanwhile, Cheryl invited her three girl finalists round for dinner at her pad, though husband Ashley, 27, was nowhere in sight.

Alexandra Burke, 20, Diana Vickers and Laura White, both 17, could not believe their luck.

A insider said: “They got all giggly like schoolkids as they thought Ashley might be there and they fancy him. But when they arrived Cheryl told them: ‘It’s girls only tonight’.”
QUOTE]
Amy86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:12
Lush_Lola
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,784
Lets she how many protest that they should be thrown off :sleep:
Lush_Lola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:13
Amy86
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 5,050
Lets she how many protest that they should be thrown off :sleep:
its rather unprofessional dont u think?
Amy86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:15
Amy86
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 5,050
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/enterta...6908-20777366/

amy shares what she thinks of all the contestants, theres some interesting bits on rachel...
Amy86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:16
vidalia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 24,469
Surely Austin would just burst out crying if someone gave him a killer look never mind grabbed hold of his shirt.
vidalia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:17
Amy86
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 5,050
^ ^ lol
Amy86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:18
robtuk06
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,425
Surely Austin would just burst out crying if someone gave him a killer look never mind grabbed hold of his shirt.
Only if there was a camera on him. You don't think he cries all the time do you?
robtuk06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:19
Official Diva
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,628
It sounds like the usual Daily Star crap to me. And I doubt any of the girls fancy Ashley. It's rather a mystery in it's self that Cheryl does..
Official Diva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:21
Amy86
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 5,050
lol i think hes alright looking just is a a$$holes
Amy86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:31
Imogen M
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 4,188
Lets she how many protest that they should be thrown off :sleep:
Bit pathetic though isn't it? They aren't little kids. They should have more self control and maturity than this.

(assuming any of this is remotely true, that is)
Imogen M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:56
mrellis33
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
welcome to the daily star, where factual information is not required for good "news" stories. The paper is total bull s**t. Don't beleive a word of it.
mrellis33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 12:22
GRAHAM2109
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 328
Dont even compare an arguement to the stuff Rachel has done and is still doing.
GRAHAM2109 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 13:22
diamond1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,073
Just out of curiosity was this thread started to genuinely discuss the falling out between Scott and Austin or was it started to try and take the heat off any bad press for Rachel and to stop people bad mouthing her on this forum and move onto Scott and Austin. ?

I sense it's for the latter as why else would Rachel be brought into the conversation.

Seems like there's an attempt by the OP to change this thread from being about Scott and Austin to being a positive thread about Rachel ....lol
diamond1 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 13:30
cybergirl3
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,660
Just out of curiosity was this thread started to genuinely discuss the falling out between Scott and Austin or was it started to try and take the heat off any bad press for Rachel and to stop people bad mouthing her on this forum and move onto Scott and Austin. ?

I sense it's for the latter as why else would Rachel be brought into the conversation.

Seems like there's an attempt by the OP to change this thread from being about Scott and Austin to being a positive thread about Rachel ....lol
Surely since, he/she created the thread, he/she can take the thread down whatever route he/she wants . . .
cybergirl3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 13:33
cybergirl3
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,660
Dont even compare an arguement to the stuff Rachel has done and is still doing.
Damn her! for trying to turn her life around and being nice and motherly. Shall we burn her at the stake? I'll get the wood, if you get the straw . . .
cybergirl3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 13:34
Magpie11
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,125
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/enterta...6908-20777366/

amy shares what she thinks of all the contestants, theres some interesting bits on rachel...
How refreshing..not a bad word about anybody.
Magpie11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 13:36
diamond1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,073
Surely since, he/she created the thread, he/she can take the thread down whatever route he/she wants . . .

Of course they can .. I don't recall saying that they couldn't, just making an observation
diamond1 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 14:06
vidalia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 24,469
I'm not certain but I think there's a thread on Food and Drink that isn't about Rachel.
vidalia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 14:12
amysmum
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wherever I lay my hat.......
Posts: 13,302
[quote=Amy86;27970535]
[/By Richard Peppiatt


The source added: “An argument started between them and in a flash they had grabbed hold of each other’s shirts and were pushing and shoving.

“It looked like they were about to throw punches but others were on hand to break them up.
Imagine them appearing on stage in the live shows with black eyes from punching each other. Now that would be interesting!!!
amysmum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 14:12
Amy86
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 5,050
Just out of curiosity was this thread started to genuinely discuss the falling out between Scott and Austin or was it started to try and take the heat off any bad press for Rachel and to stop people bad mouthing her on this forum and move onto Scott and Austin. ?

I sense it's for the latter as why else would Rachel be brought into the conversation.

Seems like there's an attempt by the OP to change this thread from being about Scott and Austin to being a positive thread about Rachel ....lol
actually no i wanted to make a point because alot of you are goin on about rachel being horrible to ruth (which i thinks bull) but anyway just makin a point that not every contestant is going to get on. there will be arguments. however in austin and scotts case they were allegedly close to a fight which is violence..rachel hasnt been through out her time at bootcamp but shes getting shit for answering back, but austin and scott are causing disruptions and its being brushed under the carpet - do you get my point?

whether you all think its true or not thats up to you but your quick to believe storys about rachel but not any other contestant.
Amy86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 14:14
Honeyblossom
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 880
If you believe this you will believe anything! Its all spin for the show. Its getting stupid now along with all the rubbish about the judges arguing and Sharon coming back.
Honeyblossom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 14:53
diamond1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,073
actually no i wanted to make a point because alot of you are goin on about rachel being horrible to ruth (which i thinks bull) but anyway just makin a point that not every contestant is going to get on. there will be arguments. however in austin and scotts case they were allegedly close to a fight which is violence..rachel hasnt been through out her time at bootcamp but shes getting shit for answering back, but austin and scott are causing disruptions and its being brushed under the carpet - do you get my point?

whether you all think its true or not thats up to you but your quick to believe storys about rachel but not any other contestant.
I don't recall saying that I believe the story's about Rachel, so I presume that when you say "you're quick to belive storys about Rachel" you are meaning "you're" in general and not me personally.

Also thank you for confirming my suspicions that you are using this thread in order to talk about Rachel (again ) and point out positive things about her.

Just my opinion of course
diamond1 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:45.