• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • The X Factor
Oh dear....More stories More arguments 'yawn'
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Love Bear
07-10-2008
Originally Posted by Honeyblossom:
“If you believe this you will believe anything! Its all spin for the show. Its getting stupid now along with all the rubbish about the judges arguing and Sharon coming back.”


Sense being spoken at last!!
fifitrixibelle
07-10-2008
Amy, from what Iv'e read, people have commented on known FACTS about her past behaviour.

Bizarre as it is, most people would agree that they DON'T KNOW about stories recently printed.

"Fans" though seem intent to assert that they do KNOW and are not true or printed to "get her"......, and also on a few occasions now have bought other contestents into the discussion i;e Ruth (you think it's bull...accept that you DO NOT KNOW!) and these two in an attempt to make Rachel look I assume better.

It doesn't make sense that you use other contestants and slate alleged behaviour and yet if anyone does about Rachel and known facts, it's suddenly seen as a bad thing for a poster to do. It's hypocritical, don't you see that??
Why expect a certain response from others about someone you are a fan of and yet think it o.k to treat others that way? It's very blinkered.
Official Diva
07-10-2008
Amy Connelly says in that interview that Rachel acted like mother hen at Boot camp who looked out for everyone.

I'd believe her version of what Rachel is like rather than some shitty rag.
Willz
07-10-2008
Wow what a load of rubbish!
AngelaW
07-10-2008
Originally Posted by Lush_Lola:
“Lets she how many protest that they should be thrown off :sleep:”

Even if it is true, 2 guys having a square up can only result in harm to themselves. Unfortunately in Rachel's case, some of her alleged actions may actually affect her children. I think this is the difference.
vidalia
08-10-2008
Originally Posted by AngelaW:
“Even if it is true, 2 guys having a square up can only result in harm to themselves. Unfortunately in Rachel's case, some of her alleged actions may actually affect her children. I think this is the difference.”

Well her alleged actions in this article seem to point to her looking after people rather than harming them but let's wait and see.
TheFletch
08-10-2008
Originally Posted by mrellis33:
“welcome to the daily star, where factual information is not required for good "news" stories. The paper is total bull s**t. Don't beleive a word of it.”

well said
cressida100
08-10-2008
Originally Posted by Official Diva:
“
I'd believe her version of what Rachel is like rather than some shitty rag.”

So positive information is true and anything else is not. You couldn't make it up.
diamond1
08-10-2008
Originally Posted by Official Diva:
“Amy Connelly says in that interview that Rachel acted like mother hen at Boot camp who looked out for everyone.

I'd believe her version of what Rachel is like rather than some shitty rag.”


This could be very true .. but at the same time it doesn't necessarily mean that the incident with Ruth and the loud TV/Chatting on the mobile didn't happen.

The incident with Ruth could have been blown up a bit by the papers but just because Amy says that Rachel acted like a mother and looked after everyone, it doesn't mean that she didn't have the odd moment of annoying someone by chatting loudly on her phone and refusing to turn the TV down.

As far as we kow Amy may not know about this alleged incident as she probably wasn't in the same room at the time. Amy's experience at Bootcamp with Rachel could be completelyu different to someone elses who had to share a room with her.

Both reports are just one individuals account's, who's to say that they both can't be true. or they both could be false, we'll never know.
vidalia
08-10-2008
Originally Posted by cressida100:
“So positive information is true and anything else is not. You couldn't make it up. ”

Have a look at Suzie's post on the Suzie slams Dannii thread to see how innaccurate these reports often are.
Love Bear
08-10-2008
Cor! Cowell and co are just LOVING this guys! No publicity is bad publicity. Everyone's talking about it - result for him, I'd say!
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map