The casual consumer has little idea what they're getting with a Blu-ray movie. Sometimes it's great, with restored picture and lots of brand new special features. Other times, it's just the same scratched up print and SD extras crapped out from DVD to Blu-ray. So Sound & Vision decided to name names and called out studios who have been half-assing Blu-ray releases to make a buck in the Blu-ray Report Card

http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/blu...port-card.html

That would also be a fair assessment of the masters provided to sky too. they defiantly vary from studio to studio.

Some early broadcast HD masters are truly awful though and wern't improved apon until sony and others saw the light and how bad some blu-ray and HD-dvd transfers looked

But at least they not contumelious about it.

That's going to be my new favourite word...