DS Forums

 
 

2 TVs both 1080p yet big price diff, why?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-10-2008, 17:35
Farscape888
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,517

http://www.play.com/Electronics/Elec...V/Product.html

http://www.play.com/Electronics/Elec...archtype=genre

Is the Bravia THAT much better? I understand Sony and Pan are considered the best (right?) so why is the Bravia so much more

P.s. reason im asking is cause looking to get a TV and figure 1080p is future proof, but not exactly rolling in it
Farscape888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 12-10-2008, 17:36
MAW
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,577
I'd say the Panasonic is better, in fact. Except for rather clunky remote interface, it's excellent.
MAW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 17:39
sancheeez
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,762
Thats also a pretty steep price on the Sony.

Richer Sounds sell exactly the same set for £630.

http://www.froogle.richersounds.com/...SONY-KDL32W400

And thats on the high street as well ......

** EDIT **

RS also undercut them (only by £30 this time) on the Panasonic ....

http://www.froogle.richersounds.com/...PANA-TX32LZD80
sancheeez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 17:49
niall campbell
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Aberfeldy
Posts: 7,035
you could get a bigger picture for £750

toshiba 42 xv505d

http://www.home-entertainment.toshib...s/?showBy=size

or get Novembers what hi-Fi as they are doing under £500 tests

whats your budget ??
niall campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 17:52
zestfulmass
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 805
Sony are well overpriced and I haave no faith in there quality at all. everytime i've had anything sony, not impressed with it.
not bought sony ever since.
zestfulmass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 17:57
Farscape888
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,517
you could get a bigger picture for £750

toshiba 42 xv505d

or get Novembers what hi-Fi as they are doing under £500 tests

whats your budget ??
pretty much around the 500/600 mark

think i may wait to see what hi-fi say, cheers
Farscape888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 18:05
niall campbell
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Aberfeldy
Posts: 7,035
think you need also to decide on a SIZE as well

40" or 42" are good sizes and not too dominating
niall campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 18:20
skinj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,206
I'd say the Panasonic is better, in fact. Except for rather clunky remote interface, it's excellent.
What's "clunky" about them?
skinj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 18:48
bobcar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,718
http://www.play.com/Electronics/Elec...V/Product.html

http://www.play.com/Electronics/Elec...archtype=genre

Is the Bravia THAT much better? I understand Sony and Pan are considered the best (right?) so why is the Bravia so much more

P.s. reason im asking is cause looking to get a TV and figure 1080p is future proof, but not exactly rolling in it
Being full HD doesn't mean it's future proof any more than HD ready is. Supporting 1080p24 is probably a better bet for future proofing though accepting 1080p inputs (whatever the TV resolution) is probably okay.

Considering that's quite a small TV then unless you sit really close to it you might be better saving money and getting a 768p TV especially since you are "not exactly rolling in it" - you probably won't notice any difference.
bobcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 18:49
niall campbell
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Aberfeldy
Posts: 7,035
http://www.nextag.co.uk/32-1080p-tv/...0--search-html

I simply googled 32" 1080p and this site looks good

however 24 fps is also to be considered as well as HDMI connections

http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/d...FXU&fullspec=F

the samsung seems ok but 24 fps??
niall campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 21:23
Farscape888
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,517
think you need also to decide on a SIZE as well

40" or 42" are good sizes and not too dominating
well obviously, unfortunately going for a 40" 1080p isnt gonna happen in my price range unless i go with someone other than Sony, Pan etc
Farscape888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-10-2008, 09:41
MAW
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,577
clunky is input selection. I hate them for it, but admit everything else is good. But then I spend a fair bit of time programming universal remotes, and vieras of a
any sort are a pain in the botty to do. For Joe average, not a big issue, but why do they not just put a button on the remote labelled 'input 3'?
MAW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-10-2008, 10:12
sancheeez
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,762
Also .... now that I think about it .....

If John Lewis stock either of the two TV's the OP first linked to, they should price match them against Richer Sounds prices ...... so you'd get a 5 year warranty thrown in for free in that case I believe?
sancheeez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-10-2008, 14:07
skinj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,206
clunky is input selection. I hate them for it, but admit everything else is good. But then I spend a fair bit of time programming universal remotes, and vieras of a
any sort are a pain in the botty to do. For Joe average, not a big issue, but why do they not just put a button on the remote labelled 'input 3'?
Probably because they have upto 11 inputs at the moment and that would mean a lot of extra buttons!!!
skinj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-10-2008, 14:09
MAW
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,577
They've always been like it.
MAW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-10-2008, 14:45
iain
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 62,990
Sony are well overpriced and I haave no faith in there quality at all. everytime i've had anything sony, not impressed with it.
not bought sony ever since.
one of the reasons i haven't been allowed to invest in a shiny new LCD HD tv is because our 11 year old Sony Wega is still going strong.

with the Bravias, i think when they first came out Sony copped a bit of flack for not being as good as they once were, but i think now they've supposedly improved them a lot.

Iain
iain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-10-2008, 17:06
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
one of the reasons i haven't been allowed to invest in a shiny new LCD HD tv is because our 11 year old Sony Wega is still going strong.

with the Bravias, i think when they first came out Sony copped a bit of flack for not being as good as they once were, but i think now they've supposedly improved them a lot.
As far as I'm aware they have been highly regarded from day one, both for performance and for reliability.

We sell a LOT of Sony, and I mean a LOT - plus we do the service on them as well, and they have been exceptionally reliable sets.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36.