• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Gadgets
  • TV and Home Entertainment Technology
Samsung LE40A656 versus Sony KDL40W4500
leo111
27-10-2008
Samsung LE40A656 versus Sony KDL40W4500
Is the sony worth the extra £100 ?
thanks
sancheeez
27-10-2008
Having seen my mates Samsung, compared with my (far lower in the range than the W series you mention) Sony ...... I'd go for the Sony.

In saying that though, I'm not sure he's ever bothered setting the Samsung up properly .... and they are notorious for needing a lot of tweaking from the factory settings to get the best from them. The Sony required very little fiddling to get me happy with the picture.
Nigel Goodwin
27-10-2008
Yes, the Sony W series are great sets - far better than Samsung.
AmjidS
27-10-2008
Sony would be better...and well worth the extra £100. Have a look at John Lewis, they are currently doing a free 5 year warranty with all of the tvs.
leo111
27-10-2008
Thanks for the replies.
Input lag 30ms faster than Samsung F96 for the sony. whereas the Samsung LE40A656 is 30 ms slower.
How much of a difference does this acutally make in the real world.
Also should i get one with a LED backlight as supposedly has a better color gamut [i.e color range].
Wonder how much of a difference the led backlight makes can the human eye detect it ?
thanks
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map