• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Over/under marked performances this week
<<
<
6 of 6
>>
>
Ignazio
02-11-2008
Originally Posted by Golden anemone:
“Did anyone else notice how they said almost the same thing to Heather this week - that a mistake at the beginning meant she lost her way and never quite got it back - as they did to Cherie last week. They did not however then mark Heather as if the mistake hadn't happened which they definitely did for Cherie last week. I know it's not her fault but talk about teacher's pet! ”

It was the mouth - an actor should be able to portray arrogance without the downturn of the mouth.

A reincarnation of Desperate Dan if ever I saw one.
davey_wavey
02-11-2008
I definetly think Austin wasn't worthy of the 10 from Len. It was good, but not that good!
EmilyIRE
02-11-2008
Austin and Erin - fair scores overall but I don't think he deserved a 10. Thought the 8 was too low though.

Jodie and Ian - way undermarked. Second best dance of the night for me.

Lisa and Brendan - slightly overmarked.

Cherie and James - slightly overmarked - should have got similar scores to Heather and Brian

Rachel and Vincent - bad flicks and kicks and never really got going.
rubberplant
02-11-2008
I think Jodie was undermarked this week, and well done to Brendan for his comment after - I thought that was great and Jodie's little face was beaming when he said it. Cherie overmarked again this week. I agree with others - if Heather, Christine or Jodie had danced that dance, they'd have been lucky to get 5's.
ravensborough
02-11-2008
Was Tom's paso meant to be ironic? If that is the sort of face he pulls when he wants to appear arrogant, then, he's not much of an actor is he? Me thinks, he shouldn't have left Holby so soon...
loz2601
02-11-2008
I think Austin got the right overall score, but should have been levelled out to 9 across the board - I thought it was the best dance of the night but Craig gave out a couple of 8's.

Cherie was overmarked I thought, as well as Tom - I really didn't think Tom's paso was great.

Thought Christine was undermarked as well.
bendymixer
02-11-2008
Thought Austin overmarked 8's and 9's didnt deserve a ten basics still a bit skippy and went out of sync with Erin

Brendan and Lisa all 9's would have been a fair reflection for me it should have beaten austin by a point IMO

Jodie and Ian were good but thought their mark Ok BUT Camilla and Tom very overmrked as were Rachel and Vincent
Sports Fan
02-11-2008
Austin and Erin overmarked - would have given 33/34. It was boring. Alesha/Matthew and Matt/Lilia danced a much better Quickstep.

Tom and Camilla overmarked - deserved 30/31. Ramps/Karen Paso the best for me.

Rachel and Vincent undermarked - 34 for me. But not as good as that danced by Louisa or Alesha.

Jodie and Ian undermarked. Deserved 33/34. Nice waltz.

Best song/music of the night was the old favourite 'Singing In The Rain'. It helped set the mood for Christine/Matthews dance. For me it added at least 3-4 marks to their score. Otherwise I would have given them 25/26 for their AS. Christine was poor. I would liked to have seen Rachel and Vincent dance an AS to this.

Brendan and Lisa overmarked. Deserved 32 but I'd deduct a further 10 marks and award 22 because Brendan is a tosser.

Cherie and James overmarked again. Salsa was crap as expected. But she's 56 and consequently is unlikely to be as fluid and agile as a 30 year old. So it's no surprise she performs the slower dances better.

I've seen nothing to date that changes my original view that the three finalists will be Austin, Tom and Rachel. The rest are just making up the numbers.
<<
<
6 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map