Fine - you can vote for whoever you like. This happens every year with a different pro/celebrity couple, it's just John and Kristina this year!
Poll: voting for John-Kristina is fine/terrible
3 of 4
Fine.
No-one has the right to tell me who I should vote for unless they are paying my bills.
Sid, your post says it all
No-one has the right to tell me who I should vote for unless they are paying my bills.
Originally Posted by Sid_1979:
“Kristina looks like she's having the time of her life! And she seems so grateful to be kept in week after week when she writes personally on her appreciation thread.
The votes I cast for John were worth every penny. He's given me more entertainment value than all the couples put together.”
“Kristina looks like she's having the time of her life! And she seems so grateful to be kept in week after week when she writes personally on her appreciation thread.
The votes I cast for John were worth every penny. He's given me more entertainment value than all the couples put together.”
Sid, your post says it all
Of course it's fine to vote for whoever we want to, including John and Kristina. It's called free choice and we're all entitled to that. I'd be extremely angry if I had no choice in the matter and was only able to vote according to someone else's opinion.
Originally Posted by Judge Dread:
“I want more of this:-
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/strictly...ly-voters.html
”
“I want more of this:-
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/strictly...ly-voters.html
”
Where did they get that "airbrushed to within an inch of his life" photo of Bruno
Voting for J & K is fine. People should be able to vote for whoever they like.
Voting for John and Kristina is fine.
They are entertaining and warm. Not like the cold fish that are Tom, Cherie and at times Lisa.
They are entertaining and warm. Not like the cold fish that are Tom, Cherie and at times Lisa.
Originally Posted by Judge Dread:
“I want more of this:-
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/strictly...ly-voters.html
”
“I want more of this:-
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/strictly...ly-voters.html
”
Quote:
“"It makes a mockery out of the judges' roles. It shows how little people care about their opinions."”
“"It makes a mockery out of the judges' roles. It shows how little people care about their opinions."”
Errm, yes, that's correct, Bruno.
If the judges would try to be a little bit more impartial, then we might care a bit more about their opinions.
Originally Posted by mintchocchip:
“Voting for John and Kristina is fine.
As I feel people have every right to vote for whoever they like. I can understand how upsetting it must be to those who's favourites have gone instead of him though. I personally don't find him overly entertaining any more and would never vote for him.”
“Voting for John and Kristina is fine.
As I feel people have every right to vote for whoever they like. I can understand how upsetting it must be to those who's favourites have gone instead of him though. I personally don't find him overly entertaining any more and would never vote for him.”
Totally agree..my sentiments as well
Voting for John & Kristina is fine.
If somebody wants to vote for them then so be it.Whoever decides to vote for them it's their own money that they are spending on the phonecall.So they can vote for whoever they want to.
If somebody wants to vote for them then so be it.Whoever decides to vote for them it's their own money that they are spending on the phonecall.So they can vote for whoever they want to.
Counts to date:
49 - Voting for John and Kristina is fine.
2 --- Voting for John and Kristina is terrible.
49 - Voting for John and Kristina is fine.
2 --- Voting for John and Kristina is terrible.
People are free to vote for whom they like whether they are basing their vote on best dancer, most improved dancer, entertainment value or just to p*** off the judges.
I like the latter stages of Strictly to be a dance competition with the best dancers in the final so I choose not to vote for John.
I like the latter stages of Strictly to be a dance competition with the best dancers in the final so I choose not to vote for John.
People are free to vote for whoever they chose, it's their money at the end of the day. I personally wouldn't vote for John because I'm not really a fan and i would rather watch someone who's better at dancing but if people enjoy watching him and want to vote then it's their choice.
Originally Posted by amelie74:
“People are free to vote for whom they like whether they are basing their vote on best dancer, most improved dancer, entertainment value or just to p*** off the judges.
I like the latter stages of Strictly to be a dance competition with the best dancers in the final so I choose not to vote for John.”
“People are free to vote for whom they like whether they are basing their vote on best dancer, most improved dancer, entertainment value or just to p*** off the judges.
I like the latter stages of Strictly to be a dance competition with the best dancers in the final so I choose not to vote for John.”
A straight position openly stated, for which my respect.
It's absolutely fine to vote for them. The show is /should be about entertainment and that is what John and Kristina deliver each week
You pays your money and you makes your choice. What concerns me is that punters may be voting in order to get their winnings, at 150 to 1! I suppose all us strictly dance lovers will have to put our money where our mouths are and vote!
Totally fine. Having said that, my opinion might change when John does a jive, although Kristina's choreography and performance is so amazing that even that may end up being OK!
People are perfectly entitled to vote for whoever they want.
I just doubt that they'd be so happy if it was their favourite being voted out over John.
I just doubt that they'd be so happy if it was their favourite being voted out over John.
3 of 4
