08/40: Quentin Willson and Hazel Newberry; Cha Cha Cha; 23/10/04.
11/40: Fiona Phillips and Brendan Cole; Waltz ; 15/10/05.
12/40: Diarmuid Gavin and Nicole Cutler; Cha Cha Cha; 23/10/04.
12/40: Diarmuid Gavin and Nicole Cutler; Quickstep; 30/10/04.
12/40: John Sergeant and Kristina Rihanoff; Cha Cha Cha; 08/11/08.

Maybe John fans want him to break the record of all time low score maybe?

It is odd that three (out of five) of the lowest scores are for the Cha Cha Cha

Poor Nicole... crap partner after crap partner then axed

Its CHAR CHAR CHAR darling

Quentin will be very upset if John passes him. I met him a few years back and he was very proud of holding that dubious accolade.

That's a bit harsh. John B wasn't 'crap'.

That would surely need Len to give less than 3...which is a physical impossibility

True; but he wasn't THAT good; she didn't have the best share of good to bad partners

Or

1 = Craig
2 = Arlene
3 = Len
2 = Bruno

8 in total

Not necessarily. IIRC, Quentin got 1, 2, 3, 2.

Quentin got 1, 1, 3, 3.

Equally I can't see Bruno giving less...

Ah. I didn't recall correctly.

But Len still gave 3.

You never know. All the judges' attitudes toward John have changed dramatically over the last couple of weeks...

I should think 1, 1, 2, 2, this week for John.

The lower they mark the longer he will stay in though,one would hope they could see that, if they want him out giving him 5's or 6's would be a more sensible path.

Personally I think they should refuse to mark him at all as he makes no attempt to actually dance! However the best way to get him out is to mark him in the 5s and 6s.

I really don’t think it is the marks that people object to….it is the unkind, unpleasant and unnecessary comments that come before.

Perhaps they should refuse to comment and give 5's and 6's and see if that works

I think they should all give him 10 and a score of 40. That way the judges can play silly people too.

But people will still vote for him and then the judges will be responsible for putting out a better dancer. I still think the judges should mark all the other dances identically and higher than John so they are all joint first on the leader board and he is last. Only sure fire way to get him in bottom 2 so he can be voted off. I love him to pieces but he needs to go now.

It wouldn't surprise me, the judges have already proved they're biased anyway, so fixing the votes wouldn't be new.

Why does he need to go? Anybody that lands in the bottom two is on borrowed time because the public don't like them. John not being there makes a difference of one week. Big deal. Rachel needs to go now she isn't going to win it nor is Jodie perhaps she should go has well. Why bother with a competition if you want the judges to CHEAT FURTHER. Whether they're a better dancer or not is irrelevant Rachel was the best dancer by far on Saturday but something about her doesn't gel with the public.

Let the audience vote out of 10

PrincessNidor:
yohinnchild: