Originally Posted by superstar111:
“Big Brother can change the rules at any time, and they did. She was evicited by public vote, and if it had been Mario, we would haev all found it perfectly fair.”
I don't think I'd have found it perfectly fair if Mario had gone, though I obviously wouldn't have minded it nearly so much.
I've thought for a long time that 1st week evictions, and tasks that decide who's up for eviction, were bad ideas, and was hoping BB wouldn't have another 1st week eviction victim in BB9.
And this new HM wasn't in any danger in week 1. Or week 2. It's almost like being given a free pass to week 3. A lot of people had seemed to be against having new HMs this year, but because Alex was removed a lot of them seem to have forgotten all about thinking new HMs were a bad idea. Even though BB isn't losing any more HMs than they would have lost anyway this week.
So I'm finding it pretty annoying, even apart from anything concerning Steph.
Quote:
“I really do think we have to start getting over it (I know this sounds harsh and like im not a fan but i really really really really am), cos I dont think theres a chance shes going back in anymore
If BB were even considering it, they would have told her or something, and it wouldnt be left this late.”
I agree, up to a point.
We shouldn't keep getting out hopes up about Steph going back, because it's
very unlikely to happen, and we should focus instead on what she's doing now and on possibilities for the future.
But I think it's understandable that some of us are a bit annoyed that someone else is getting a chance right now, and with a twist helping them rather than hurting.