• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
The judges are under marking Austin - why??
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
vodachick
22-11-2008
Tonight, he was worth much better scores, surely......
Endemoniada
22-11-2008
I think they're overmarking across the board tbh.
FallenLeaves
22-11-2008
No, I don't think it was undermarked at all.
allisonbm2
22-11-2008
I thought he was a bit overmarked tonight actually
Mamaboogie
22-11-2008
I think Austin is great - but IMO he was OVERmarked tonight.

Didn't like his Cha Cha Cha at all.
peach45
22-11-2008
Overmarked for sure.
Alli-F
22-11-2008
I'm an Austin fanatic and I thought his marks were fair if I'm honest. I thought he was better than Lisa but his place on the leaderboard was about right.

I'm just relieved his cha cha wasn't a car crash!
teewoods
22-11-2008
i wont have gievn him anything over 32. No way did he deserve 35 no waY!
flashgirl
22-11-2008
I thought they marked him about right to be honest. In fact, he may have got one of two marks too many. I love him and hope he makes the final but that dance had several mistakes/timing issues. Only little ones but they were still there.
laurab88
22-11-2008
Overmarked. As per usual.
Daisy_M
22-11-2008
I thought he was overmarked tonight.
Katenutzs
22-11-2008
They know Austin will get public support and rachael won't ... simple really
Strictly Autumn
22-11-2008
If anything, Austin & Erin were overmarked.

It deserved the maximum of a row of 8's.
Veri
22-11-2008
If they're undermarking him, they're protecting him from an overmarking backlash.
Erinfan
22-11-2008
No way was he undermarked.
Xassy
22-11-2008
No, not undermarked. I think he was marked rather generously.
fabulist
22-11-2008
I thought he was rubbish tonight. I couldn't believe his scores and comments.
Racheal also was slightly overmarked.
Perhaps the judges were told to try and inject some fun/positivity back into the show?
Rotationbl
22-11-2008
lol
Ignazio
22-11-2008
overmarked - 1 mark less from each judge would have been about right.
Tanya_Cheex
22-11-2008
I much preferred Christine's Cha Cha - I thought Austin was over-marked
Rogana Josh
22-11-2008
Originally Posted by vodachick:
“Tonight, he was worth much better scores, surely......”


Because little Rachel is their favourite and they have chosen her to win
vodachick
22-11-2008
Originally Posted by Tanya_Cheex:
“I much preferred Christine's Cha Cha - I thought Austin was over-marked”


wow really? i thought she was slow and stiff.....
claire2281
22-11-2008
Originally Posted by Tanya_Cheex:
“I much preferred Christine's Cha Cha - I thought Austin was over-marked”

Nonsense. Christine's wasn't much better than Cherie's last week. They both had the same lack of attack and Cherie was actually better technically.

If you look at Austin's individually it was overmarked but then again it was fair in comparison with the other dances on the night so no complaints from me.
moonbaby
22-11-2008
I think Austin is probably doing quite well with the public vote- so maybe the judges don't feel the need to mark him well.
Spinaker5
22-11-2008
Originally Posted by vodachick:
“Tonight, he was worth much better scores, surely......”

Surely not. I thought he was overmarked. Too much gimmick and not enough dance.
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map