• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
10s have done more damage to Rachel than anything else the judges could have done
Veri
22-11-2008
The outpouring of anti-Rachel comments and threads tonight is ample proof of that.

Those who like her had better do some voting!
Rotationbl
22-11-2008
No, she was never popular on here anyway.
petertard
22-11-2008
Would be hilarious if she was in the dance-off despite all the judges' pouring out their 10's on her.
Psychosis
22-11-2008
Sadly I agree with you I don't think they helped her.
moonbaby
22-11-2008
Its not really her fault she was overmarked. But it has infuriated me. I thought Tom was as good.

I dunno what it is with Rachel. I just don't like her.
FelineFantastic
22-11-2008
I think that the judges made their positions clear with the marking tonight- the two they want to keep 1st and 2nd and the other two 'hedge their bets' couples in joint 3rd.

The thing is they didn't even need to so blatently overmark her for her to be in first place!

Dream dance off- Rachel and Tom!
Veri
22-11-2008
Originally Posted by FelineFantastic:
“I think that the judges made their positions clear with the marking tonight- the two they want to keep 1st and 2nd and the other two 'hedge their bets' couples in joint 3rd.

The thing is they didn't even need to so blatently overmark her for her to be in first place!

Dream dance off- Rachel and Tom!”

Unless the judges are incredibly thick, they must know by now that 4 10s would work against Rachel. So if their marks make their position clear, it must be that they at least don't want her to win.

Or perhaps they were just carried away by the dance.
Veri
22-11-2008
Originally Posted by moonbaby:
“Its not really her fault she was overmarked. But it has infuriated me. I thought Tom was as good. ”

So why aren't you infuriated instead by the under-marking for Tom?

Quote:
“I dunno what it is with Rachel. I just don't like her.”

I kinda understand that, since I felt much the same about Emma.

OTOH, it leaves me since I don't feel that way at all about Rachel.
Golden anemone
22-11-2008
Let's hope so.
CASPER1066
22-11-2008
Judges never learn..................
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map