Originally Posted by EmilyIRE:
“I agree she did a heel turn. But other than that I didn't see any of the heel leads.
And Karen is a world class dancer and judge in Latin - not ballroom. I was at a lecture with Nicole Cutler recently - just as good as Karen, and she was asked a question on ballroom but said she couldn't answer as she was a latin dancer.
Foxtrot does have more straight line than other ballroom dances but I disagree that it's just in a straight line the whole time, it can be just as interesting as other dances if choreographed well.”
I have to break my silence, sorry.
Guess we have to agree to disagree about the heel leads?
I didn't say foxtrot is straight line
the whole time but it's *basically* done in a straight line. Of course you can do A-line, contra-check (rare, but why not?), some kicks and flicks, fanning, etc.. But those are only accents (and if used too much becomes gimmicky), not the actual basic foxtrot. Am I right?
Of course, foxtrot can be interesting. But most of the interesting points are oftentimes achieved when the choreographer break the ballroom hold. Also, if the dance are dance at a faster pace (a 'fast' foxtrot), you can get away with making it 'less boring' but it tends to be more gimmicky, like what Jill did in her foxtrot with Darren.
I like Darren Gough's foxtrot, but it was faster in tempo (often so as to hide the dancer's limitation) too. Arlene once said that you can 'cheat' foxtrot by dancing at a faster pace. This implies that the slower the dance, the more control you need. Perhaps dancing slow (for an amateur like Rachel) means it looks boring?
Nevermind. I am sorry I seem to be making enemies for liking Rachel's foxtrot!