I've been thinking this for a while now and just wondered if anyone else thought that he might not actually be that worthy of his "evil" judge tag?
I personally think that he is always reasonably fair and isn't guilty of constantly over marking his favourites (although I do think his 3 for Jodie's Samba was too low).
I also like his constructive technical criticism and would much rather have heard and listened to some of his remarks if I got to the dance off and needed to do something to make my dance better, than some of the twaddle that comes out of Arlene's mouth for instance!
He also seems to be able to laugh at himself, and not take his position to seriously unlike some of the others.
I personally think that he is always reasonably fair and isn't guilty of constantly over marking his favourites (although I do think his 3 for Jodie's Samba was too low).
I also like his constructive technical criticism and would much rather have heard and listened to some of his remarks if I got to the dance off and needed to do something to make my dance better, than some of the twaddle that comes out of Arlene's mouth for instance!
He also seems to be able to laugh at himself, and not take his position to seriously unlike some of the others.





however his problem is he seems to flick between two modes.
