|
||||||||
zig&chan appreciation thread (Part 4) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,425
|
[List][*]Admin Edit: This thread is a continuation of zig&chan appreciation thread[/List] Quote:
I'll reiterate what i posted on the other thread. I'm astounded by the naivety on both threads regarding pa's. i can only surmise that very few have actually attended one.
MB |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,304
|
Quote:
Well Ziggy cant help the way you feel.
He will be portrayed like this with or without DL. Stu was, Paul was, in fact they all are if they are in a relationship. The media will do anything for a headline. Last few weeks Zig was being humilliated by headlines of Billi and Chanelle. Then there was Chanelle and Ian, oh and Chanelle and Ryan. All since he came out of the house. We continued to support Chanelle through all these so why not Ziggy now? Hes done nothing wrong except to work. How shallow we all are. Before I start interesting fact ............ all pics regarding the PA on the Wenn site have been removed and on looking at the keystone press site these seem to be copies of Wenn pics. Ok my take:- Tuesday article in DS promoting Chanelle's interview in New mag ........ an article I may say even has me a grown man very touched. However imo it does give a slant on Ziggy making most of the running eg cards, flowers,pressies and surpise holiday breaks. Wednesday again in the DS ......... article trying to redress the balance saying Chanelle has booked a break away for them this week showing she is as commited Ziggy ( but we already knew that ).Saturday DS again ......... pics initially on wenn removed and now in hands of imo Keystone press. DL reads comments on his comments made re Chanelle ....... realises he has mis read opinions and tries rather badly again in my opinion to correct his error. Not the best of theories but just a different slant. We must remember that there have been numerous PA's done since leaving the house and uptodate we have not been exposed to anything like this.why??? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Quote:
Lenchal, I wish you weren't so loose with your words
You are falling into the DL trap of attempting to diss Chan to support Zak. I thought you knew better Lenchsal. I know shes not a bunny boiler. Do you not see what I meant in my post? For her to tell him off would clarify the paper saying shes a bunny boiler. All tabloid lies? Yep definately so why arent the same words being brandished about the words the DS has about this? Oh because its Ziggy ![]() I am not dissing Chan far from it. Im trying to be adult about the pictures just like Chanelle will be. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,490
|
Quote:
How long did the kiss last? How long was he close to each one?
Where were his feet placed? His groin? Wheres the problem with this? Im a Chan fan through and through but people are being ridiculous with these pics IMHO. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NW London
Posts: 1,395
|
Quote:
ive got an idea- why dont we talk about something happier and not about ziggy pa pictures;)
Let me just say this, that some woman not all woman will always though themself at a good looking man when they have drink in them. Can I say I'm soooo happy thaa England have knock Australia out of the rugby wolrd cup, so I'm not going to let anything get to me today about these PA pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,490
|
Quote:
You obviously didnt read the DS then. It clearly says Bunny boiler in that.
I know shes not a bunny boiler. Do you not see what I meant in my post? For her to tell him off would clarify the paper saying shes a bunny boiler. All tabloid lies? Yep definately so why arent the same words being brandished about the words the DS has about this? Oh because its Ziggy ![]() I am not dissing Chan far from it. Im trying to be adult about the pictures just like Chanelle will be. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Quote:
People are expressing their opinions towards these slightly dodgy pics. It's only natural and should be allowed IMO. No point calling people ridiculous and not adult
My opinion is people are being ridiculous about the pictures. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,139
|
Quote:
People are expressing their opinions towards these slightly dodgy pics. It's only natural and should be allowed IMO. No point calling people ridiculous and not adult
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,799
|
Quote:
People are expressing their opinions towards these slightly dodgy pics. It's only natural and should be allowed IMO. No point calling people ridiculous and not adult
they both have to live with the less savoury aspects of the tabloids, Zac has had to live with photos of Chan with Best, and Lee Ryan, both innocent, but to some people who read the tabloids they will not be innocent, and the copy that was written to accompany the Best photos was to humiliate him, he has to live with rumours she is running back to her exes, she had sex with Billie, all untrue but some will believe it, so what if there are no photos, the words are just as bad, this is work, he was paid to be there and entertain the ladies, who paid to see him, |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,182
|
Quote:
People are expressing their opinions towards these slightly dodgy pics. It's only natural and should be allowed IMO. No point calling people ridiculous and not adult
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,490
|
Quote:
Yes lets do that.
Let me just say this, that some woman not all woman will always though themself at a good looking man when they have drink in them. Can I say I'm soooo happy thaa England have knock Australia out of the rugby wolrd cup, so I'm not going to let anything get to me today about these PA pictures. ![]() ?
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Quote:
Who cares what the papers say. If you repeat these slurs then you are bringing them into play as if true. I am talking about the pics and DL, Zak's agent's negative blog text, and drawing my own opinion an so are other posters. All the rest can be dismissed can't it. Anyway you look at it people are still entitled to their opinion without being insulted.
The pics are work. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,098
|
Quote:
You are wrong to equate the Nuts photoshoots (controlled environment, sensitively shot, well photographed) to these sleazy shots of Zak and girls that he didn't have to get so involved with. You cannot argue for Zak by putting down Chan's legit work (they are some of her best photos). Zak has to stand by his own actions. I personally think that Chan is quite adult about these things and the media can easily make a mountain out of a molehill, she'll dismiss it as work, although might scold Zak privately for behaving like an idiot. It is however unfortunate that Zak's own Agent seems to be the one orchestrating the Player angle like Purdy says
WRT Zak's agent using the player tag - I don't like it and moreover it does not seem to be the image that Ziggy is trying to project. I have already suggested that it may be the case of 'off the shelf' promotion for men rather than taking the time to market him more appropriately. I have suggested earlier that it is up to him to vote with his feet if he is not happy. You and others have persuaded me that Chanelle doing the Nuts style photos is a good way of her appealing to the male market and projecting herself forward as something other than just a BB housemate. Ziggy also has to look for ways of promoting himself and if PA's is the only way then so be it. I would much rather see both of them back on TV though if you could organise that for me. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bushey
Posts: 5,549
|
I find it difficult to read some of the posts at the moment here because it seems to me that people are posting about his behaviour at the PA's in a negative manner.
My take on it is if I go to a club for a PA and the person I am going to see is sullen or sulky, refuses to mingle, have pictures taken with or have a peck on the cheek etc., then I would feel cheated. Having spent my hard earned dosh to get in, buy a few rounds of drinks etc., I want to get my monies worth. Whether we like it or not (and I have no problems myself - after all he goes home to Channelle) this is part of the job he needs to do to maximise his exposure and broaden his fan base. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,490
|
Quote:
TBF I was not comparing the quality of the photographs more the effect they could have on Ziggy and Chanelle. Here I think there is a comparison to be made. It is possible that Ziggy may prefer his g/f not to be displayed on the front page of the DS as she has been, similarly I suspect Chanelle would probably prefer Ziggy not to be pawed by women on PA assignments. If as I believe that is par for the course on male PA assignments (I have not been to any so I have no personal experience) then I do not attribute blame on him.
WRT Zak's agent using the player tag - I don't like it and moreover it does not seem to be the image that Ziggy is trying to project. I have already suggested that it may be the case of 'off the shelf' promotion for men rather than taking the time to market him more appropriately. I have suggested earlier that it is up to him to vote with his feet if he is not happy. You and others have persuaded me that Chanelle doing the Nuts style photos is a good way of her appealing to the male market and projecting herself forward as something other than just a BB housemate. Ziggy also has to look for ways of promoting himself and if PA's is the only way then so be it. I would much rather see both of them back on TV though if you could organise that for me. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,799
|
Quote:
I think Ziggy would be out of order to prefer Chanelle didn't so those shoots. He wasn't with her then and Chan can do what work she wants in terms of Photo shoots without seeking Zak's say so anyway, as long as she herself is comfortable with it. These PA pics are like pap pics of what Ziggy has been getting up to at clubs in these PR's, totally different thing.
no they are not, if he does not like her doing glamour shoots he has every right to say so, doesn't mean he has any right to tell her to stop, but if he doesn't like his girlfriend naked/half naked in photoshoots he has a right to his opinion, same as she has the right to say I don't like what goes on at your PA's, doesn't mean he has to stop, or change what goes on it is an opinion, |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,490
|
Quote:
Oh so we can discuss anything positive written about Chanelle but not anything negative? That must never be repeated.
The pics are work. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Quote:
I think Ziggy would be out of order to prefer Chanelle didn't so those shoots. He wasn't with her then and Chan can do what work she wants in terms of Photo shoots without seeking Zak's say so anyway, as long as she herself is comfortable with it. These PA pics are like pap pics of what Ziggy has been getting up to at clubs in these PR's, totally different thing.
Im sorry but some people are rubbing their hands in glee at this. Anything to discredit him and be against Chanelles choice of partner. I am ashamed to be a Chanelle fan if this is how they behave with regards to a few pictures that are totally innocent. I am now chosing to use my ignore button for the first time ever. ![]() What about the ones of her with Callum? or Lee? She was looking at Callum with those come to bed eyes IIR
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Quote:
It is not what is discussed it is how it is discussed: dissing Chan in order to big up Zig, dissing FMs who offer differing opinions, as noted in recent posts.
Bye |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,490
|
Quote:
no they are not, if he does not like her doing glamour shoots he has every right to say so, doesn't mean he has any right to tell her to stop, but if he doesn't like his girlfriend naked/half naked in photoshoots he has a right to his opinion, same as she has the right to say I don't like what goes on at your PA's, doesn't mean he has to stop, or change what goes on it is an opinion,
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Anyone going to Leicester tonight?
Hope they get a snuggle from Zig ![]() Oh I think Nicki is going isnt she? |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,799
|
Quote:
Zak would have no right to dump Chan due to her decision to do Nuts shoots (not sleazy and involve no other men), but Chan would have every right to dump Zig as a result of Zak's sleazy photos in the papers. You can't equate the two things. Of course they are both allowed their opinions.
the two are work, just different work, |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NW London
Posts: 1,395
|
Quote:
Yes, is there a repeat tonight anytime, I missed it
?
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Quote:
Nuts not sleazy, that must be one of the funniest things I have read in a long time, it is a w*nk mag (apologies for my crudity) why would she dump him for doing his job, I see nothing sleazy in those photos,
the two are work, just different work, How many of these women left with him? |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,490
|
Quote:
no its not. Its his work just like hers is glamour.
Im sorry but some people are rubbing their hands in glee at this. Anything to discredit him and be against Chanelles choice of partner. I am ashamed to be a Chanelle fan if this is how they behave with regards to a few pictures that are totally innocent. I am now chosing to use my ignore button for the first time ever. ![]() What about the ones of her with Callum? or Lee? She was looking at Callum with those come to bed eyes IIR:eek: If you read my posts you will find that I actually think that Chan will understand the pics and will trust Ziggy, especially after the Irish interview. I just object to your manner of argument and using supposed Chan negatives to excuse supposed Zigg behaviour in argument, it's not needed .
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:28.


).

