|
||||||||
zig&chan appreciation thread (Part 4) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,098
|
Quote:
I am mostly objecting to Lanchsal's use of language and dissing Chan and FMs who offer opposing opinions (if you read the posts properly).
![]() Sometimes when things get heated people exaggerate things in order to make a point which is what I suspect has been happening here - on both sides. Maybe we all need to take some of the chill pills which we were talking about earlier. I think they need to be taken with food - so I'm going to get my dinner now.
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,094
|
Quote:
Why are you comparing the Nuts shoot with Zac's PA's???
![]() The Nuts shoot is a completly different line of work! So why is that even being discussed??? The fact is some people on here (more than likely Ziggy haters) are now complaing because he was photoraphed doing something that he was being paid to do............ just like Chanelle has been photographed meeting people at her PA's. The difference is that security is different because Chanelle is a woman, just like the security and rules would be if it was another female celeb doing a PA. Why on earth some people are comparing a Nuts shoot and a PA is beyond me. As far as I can see in some people's etes Zac can't do right for doing wrong, and if that's the case then I'm sorry but you are all in the wrong thread as this is an appreciation thread for BOTH |
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,139
|
Quote:
Just creeping in quietly just to make it crystal clear that my only concern about the pa pics is how DL has used them to promote Ziggy with, and bringing Chanelle into it.(As on his site)
Having read your post that didnt appear to be your only concern - but you seem to have a real problem with Ziggy as mentioned in your introduction to the ZAT yesterday, and look at the trouble that little episode started. I think people with real deep down feelings of dislike for Ziggy shouldnt actually post of this thread because you are never going to change your minds about him, its always there just under the surface waiting to come out at every possible opportunity. Having spent all the weeks of BB taking flak from all the nasty threads out there against Ziggy, I certainly dont want to start all over again and certainly not defending him on a Z&C AT.
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: At my keyboard
Posts: 8,959
|
Quote:
Then I shall back away from this thread also.
I have already left the other place today and feel my opinion matters to no one. I must not diss Chanelle. I must diss Ziggy. If those are my options then I chose neither and will retire. I thought this thread was all for freedom of speech. Awwww, don't go, LENCH. You were the main player in my Damasculian conversion over Chanelle. It would be a shame for you to leave now. Especially over a disagreement like this. People should be free to post their opinions. After all, that's what this forum is for. |
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 971
|
Quote:
But I thought you said he was sleazy?
I see nothing sleazy in those pictures. He is clothed, not snogging, signing breasts, fondling breasts or even looking at them inappropriately yet hes being accused of being sleazy. I hope he never kisses his friends or aquaintances or work associates ever again.....the slut. |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Quote:
I originally mentioned the Nuts photoshoot but I was not meaning it to diss Chan at all merely to show that there is a case for give and take on both sides. Respect for each other and going home together at the end of the day is what really matters.
![]() Sometimes when things get heated people exaggerate things in order to make a point which is what I suspect has been happening here - on both sides. Maybe we all need to take some of the chill pills which we were talking about earlier. I think they need to be taken with food - so I'm going to get my dinner now. ![]() Chanelle is happy. Unfortunately shes with the wrong person in some peoples eyes. He cant do right for doing wrong sadly. |
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Quote:
Awwww, don't go, LENCH. You were the main player in my Damasculian conversion over Chanelle. It would be a shame for you to leave now. Especially over a disagreement like this. People should be free to post their opinions. After all, that's what this forum is for.
![]() Im not a fan of hers ![]() Im a bad, bad person ![]() Thanks Taffy ![]() I will be around. Ive a soppy scrapbook to finish
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bushey
Posts: 5,549
|
OMG - WHAT IS GOING ON HERE TODAY???
I'm sorry but I cannot believe what I am reading at the moment. Where did all this negativity/dissing actually come from? Yesterday we were all upbeat about his TV appearance and his wonderful comments about Chiggy and now this. We all need to remember for Ziggy it is JUST A JOB and we need to get back to what we all do best APPRECIATE. |
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 288
|
Quote:
Zak would have no right to dump Chan due to her decision to do Nuts shoots (not sleazy and involve no other men), but Chan would have every right to dump Zig as a result of Zak's sleazy photos in the papers. You can't equate the two things. Of course they are both allowed their opinions.
Sleaze is clearly in the eye of the beholder, and from behind my anti-sleaze-specs I see no sleaze from either of them (more from other people's actions/interpretations). I would rather not be judgemental about either of them - there was enough of that in the House. Another interpretation would be that the partners of many of the females pictured at these male PAs have strong grounds for 'divorce', and the 'PA' is a big secret contributor to the rising divorce rate - feasible but daft and not substantiated by the evidence available.PS "Nuts shoots ([[]] involve no other men)..." ...only the ones in the readership/viewers (and the agent orchestrating it)... ...nevertheless from my perspective, not sleaze, as I choose not to see it like that. |
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 8,518
|
Quote:
What in the name of God has happened in here since I was last on
It's really went down in the dumps hasn't it.All because of a few silly pictures of Ziggy doing what he is being paid to do..... be nice to the fans who some have came a long way to meet and support him!! If Chanelle doesn't have a problem with it then why should you lot?? A lot of mentions about the difference between Zac and Chanelle's appearances too. The difference is that girls can get away with a lot more stuff in this line when meeting male celebrities, however if someone pushed too much with a female celeb. then it would be all hell broke loose and that fan being acussed of this thing and that thing. And I'm not just talking about Chanelle and Zac here, it's across the board from Zac and Chanelle to members of Westlife or Take That to The Spice Girls or Rhianna Last edited by Zigesa : 06-10-2007 at 18:08. Reason: spelling mistakes |
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,098
|
Quote:
Then I shall back away from this thread also.
I have already left the other place today and feel my opinion matters to no one. I must not diss Chanelle. I must diss Ziggy. If those are my options then I chose neither and will retire. I thought this thread was all for freedom of speech. Don't you dare go anywhere. You just about own this thread.I think I started this - I obviously touched a nerve somewhere On this thread you are not supposed to diss either (but I know you know that) and I don't think you have - I don't think I did - I certainly didn't mean to. I agree freedom of speech rules.I suggest a glass of wine and a chill pill. I'm taking my chill pill with dinner so - see you back here after dinner / XFactor / Strictly dancing etc. If there are no posts from you between now and then - I will track you down and make you post - you can run but you can't hide! ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: At my keyboard
Posts: 8,959
|
Quote:
But Im dissing Chan
![]() Im not a fan of hers ![]() Im a bad, bad person ![]() Thanks Taffy ![]() I will be around. Ive a soppy scrapbook to finish ![]() You're one of her most loyal fans LENCH. Glad to see that you're sticking around. Good on yer gal ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,841
|
hows the scrap book coming on-how many messages now?
let we know when u want me to send the quotes over-dont worry theres not loads! |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,094
|
Quote:
Then I shall back away from this thread also.
I have already left the other place today and feel my opinion matters to no one. I must not diss Chanelle. I must diss Ziggy. If those are my options then I chose neither and will retire. I thought this thread was all for freedom of speech. |
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: on cloud 9 in lancashire
Posts: 1,014
|
Quote:
Then I shall back away from this thread also.
I have already left the other place today and feel my opinion matters to no one. I must not diss Chanelle. I must diss Ziggy. If those are my options then I chose neither and will retire. I thought this thread was all for freedom of speech. Of course your opinion matters. All our opinions matter, just give me time to catch up with the going on, but so far I can't see what you've done wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,098
|
Quote:
I said from an outside perspective I saw the DS pics as making him look sleazy. It was my opinion of how I thought he would be perceived by people who didn't know who he was and how people would see him who were reading the paper. I mentioned this in relation to how I feel his agent is portraying him.
I made a comment today - fairly innocent I thought and all hell broke loose. I really hadn't intended it the way it was taken it just happens sometimes. Like you I haven't been posting on forums for long and I think there is a way of doing it which I am still learning. We can't expect everyone to like everything they do - and within reason these concerns should be voiced without fear of being slammed down. IMHO. |
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Quote:
Don't you dare go anywhere. You just about own this thread.I think I started this - I obviously touched a nerve somewhere On this thread you are not supposed to diss either (but I know you know that) and I don't think you have - I don't think I did - I certainly didn't mean to. I agree freedom of speech rules.I suggest a glass of wine and a chill pill. I'm taking my chill pill with dinner so - see you back here after dinner / XFactor / Strictly dancing etc. If there are no posts from you between now and then - I will track you down and make you post - you can run but you can't hide! ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,094
|
pmsl at emmon holms & his wife on ant & dec saturday takeaway doing beat the boys
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,490
|
Quote:
Then I shall back away from this thread also.
I have already left the other place today and feel my opinion matters to no one. I must not diss Chanelle. I must diss Ziggy. If those are my options then I chose neither and will retire. I thought this thread was all for freedom of speech. |
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,682
|
Quote:
hows the scrap book coming on-how many messages now?
let we know when u want me to send the quotes over-dont worry theres not loads! There must be more quotes? come on guys. What did they say that we remember. Whats your favourite guys. Come on....... |
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 8,591
|
Quote:
I am mostly objecting to Lanchsal's use of language and dissing Chan and FMs who offer opposing opinions (if you read the posts properly).
Quote:
Then I shall back away from this thread also.
I have already left the other place today and feel my opinion matters to no one. I must not diss Chanelle. I must diss Ziggy. If those are my options then I chose neither and will retire. I thought this thread was all for freedom of speech. get you right back here now!!! I'm not letting you go anywhere, you are one of the founders of this thread and I ain't letting you sneak off anywhere If you do I'll find ya!!Honest to God I go off to make everyone a nice cup of tea and had loads of biccies for us and I've had 2 people leave me already ![]() I'm not happy ![]() This is getting beyond a joke now. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,928
|
How many times did Ziggy threaten to leave the house?
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,841
|
i would love chanelle and ziggy to do beat the boys-think ive mentioned it before
![]() that would make our saturday night |
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: My couch
Posts: 21,401
|
Quote:
Then I shall back away from this thread also.
I have already left the other place today and feel my opinion matters to no one. I must not diss Chanelle. I must diss Ziggy. If those are my options then I chose neither and will retire. I thought this thread was all for freedom of speech.
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 116
|
hi just caught up after being out watching my OH play football. I think every 1 needs to calm down about those ziggy pictures, it's only work, it's not like he is having a passionate kiss with any of these girls. I'm sure chanelle isn't bothered by the attention he gets, if she is then i would suggest she finds a boyfriend out of the public eye. My boyfriend plays for a fairly small football club but still gets local girls throwing themselves at him when we go out.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:29.







I see no sleaze from either of them (more from other people's actions/interpretations). I would rather not be judgemental about either of them - there was enough of that in the House. Another interpretation would be that the partners of many of the females pictured at these male PAs have strong grounds for 'divorce', and the 'PA' is a big secret contributor to the rising divorce rate - feasible but daft and not substantiated by the evidence available.
get you right back here now!!! I'm not letting you go anywhere, you are one of the founders of this thread and I ain't letting you sneak off anywhere 