Originally Posted by The Superviser:
“I am mostly objecting to Lanchsal's use of language and dissing Chan and FMs who offer opposing opinions (if you read the posts properly).”
“I am mostly objecting to Lanchsal's use of language and dissing Chan and FMs who offer opposing opinions (if you read the posts properly).”
I originally mentioned the Nuts photoshoot but I was not meaning it to diss Chan at all merely to show that there is a case for give and take on both sides. Respect for each other and going home together at the end of the day is what really matters.

Sometimes when things get heated people exaggerate things in order to make a point which is what I suspect has been happening here - on both sides.
Maybe we all need to take some of the chill pills which we were talking about earlier. I think they need to be taken with food - so I'm going to get my dinner now.







I see no sleaze from either of them (more from other people's actions/interpretations). I would rather not be judgemental about either of them - there was enough of that in the House. Another interpretation would be that the partners of many of the females pictured at these male PAs have strong grounds for 'divorce', and the 'PA' is a big secret contributor to the rising divorce rate - feasible but daft and not substantiated by the evidence available.
get you right back here now!!! I'm not letting you go anywhere, you are one of the founders of this thread and I ain't letting you sneak off anywhere