I thought Ping Pong was a restaurant - isn't it the one Zig said Chan refused to eat her expensiev meal in?

It would be better for both parties to refuse to give any further interviews about the split, he said and she said will not increase their polularity, but reduce it. I say again that the NOTW would not print the story about the recordings if they did not stand up, so if Chanelle does deny the allegations the other evidence that Ziggy apparanty hasmay come to light in make it's way to the media.

Both have decided where they want to take their careers so it would be best to concentrate on that rather then the past. If Ziggy gives further interviews about the relationship and not Chanelle he will piss people off and vice versa.

Ziggy was pic'd looking friendly with Nikki on that marathon clubbing night of his before the split. So I guess he has forgiven her, though as I recall and I'm not going to repeat them here, she said some awful things about him.

Just seems weird for him to be clubbing with girls and girls that Chanelle also spent time with.

Sorry - don't know how to get photos up. Just two of him outside arriving dressed up smartly all in black.

GMTV will probably be a mixture of promoting the show starting next week, her perfume launch, her calendar out and any other work she has coming up. They'll probably ask her about the allegations made and whether she's spoken to Ziggy, but doubt it will be the main focus. She probably just deny them, be polite about Ziggy and say she has moved on, concentrating on career. Doubt they'll get much out of her. she hasn't massively slated him so far, so doubt she will yet. think she just wants to try and move on.

That was the night she allegedly did something to herself - just wondering what we have for the week after that when she was bandaged up.

I agree it will piss people off- although I do think Chanelle should have the chance of an interview after now seeing what Ziggy said. Her first interview was before the articles had come out & just on the split up- so I do think she has the right to respond

Why shouldn't Chanelle have a right of reply to the allegations he has made against her.

If it's ok in some peoples eyes for him to say the sort of things he has said about her then why shouldn't she give her side of the story, seems fair to me or is it a case of people being a bit bothered by what Chanelle may actually say about him that is the reason they don't want her to answer what he has said

I know he said something about that night but cant remember what but do remember thinking that it whatever he said was inaccurate cos she went on out to Faces that night and also had her friends staying with her that night and week iirc

I agree with what you are saying, however if the magazine spins the interview, he may feel the need to respond, then she will respond........

Quite a few feel that it would be more dignified for her not to respond, and avoid a tit-for-tat. I've wavered between the two views, but I think now I just want to hear her side whatever it is.

I think it was Sunday 30 September. I could be wrong. It was the same night as the re-launch event at Faces in Essex, at any rate.

That would explain why he is so dressed up! Thought that was the nightclub from other week. Just says Ping Pong on Keystone. So, Ziggy on a date? Kind of ironic, going to the same place he talked about in the article.

I totally agree. Maybe he shouldn't have started it then

I don't know what evidence he has if he has any, however there is a risk that more revelations could come out and this could damage Chanelle, imagine if the recoding were made available on the internet for all to hear. A dignified silence could be the best way forward.

Exactly he should have been more dignified about the split instead of sensationalising things just to make more money out of the split..

Chanelle doesn't tend to attack so much in interviews though. She seems pretty skilled at closing questions and saying the right thing. She has rarely been trapped into difficult answers. She can answer the allegations matter of factly, without bring Ziggy or any new allegations into play.

To be honest, I can't see her attacking Ziggy. Even after BB, she really didn't. A few, I don't think he cared about me and Ziggy is lying about the s*x thing, but she has never slated him. That bit annoyed mein Ziggys article. My sister saw she'd caned me. I must have missed them articles and I read them all...unless he too, has just read the headlines and nothing more.

I can't see Ziggy doing anymore interviews. It would be media suicide. A majority are not believing all of Ziggys allegations and he might find a few exes come out with a few kiss and tells if he carries on. He was worried about stories coming out in BB house and certainly about something Chanelle might say, so I think we can establish he has a few skeletons in his cupboard.

What recording is this? I thought it was claimed he recorded events (his version) on audio tape to remind himself, as he was convinced she was doing the same. I thought those were the tapes mentioned. His shocking texts simply supported Chanelle's case, as she came across upset but rational I thought.

If he actually had any evidence of what he was actually saying it would have been shown in either the NOTW or Heat all he showed was two text messages from a girl who was quite clearly distraught that they had split.

The only other piece of evidence he could give was a scratch on his neck which could quite easily have been done by Mollie while play fighting, afterall he does show more attention to his dog than anyone else

I think the very fact that he made a recording would work against him, rather than any content?

Even if Ziggy does not respond, the NOTW/The Sun may still print another story without speaking to Ziggy if some of the allegations she denies did in fact happen and they have the evidence. As the DS has proved, you don't need to speak to anybody to print a story.

Re. that scratch, he said she lunged at him on Tues 30 Oct. That was the day the disloyal Star mag article came out, and Heat with those ridiculous claims by the lap-dancer.

The day before he did Star mag (and the first nasty DS article came out), that's 22 Oct, there's the bizarre break-up over the phone when he refuses to sack his management, and the girls are laughing in the car in the background - she dumps him and changes her mobile no.). Chan mentions nothing about this dumping - or any dumping in fact.

After all the supposed attacks and psychotic behaviour, why does he end it after they've spent a couple of really nice days/nights together? I still can't figure it out.

Well let's just see what happens. So far Ziggy has sold a story on Chanelle and has made certain allegations about her. Therefore it is only right and proper that Chanelle, should she choose, be allowed a right to reply. To avoid the scenario which you referred to earlier happening, she may decide not to dignify the allegations with a response, we don't know yet what she will do or what she is being advised to do.

Simple fact is why did he go back to her if he was so worried about how she was behaving when she had dumped him.

If things where as bad as he makes out he have thanked his lucky stars and stayed well away..

I think she shouldn't leave his allegations as said without responding. I think it would be better for her to respond in a dignified manner, without causing further backlash and any further slanging matches. But to say nothing, would mean that some people will take it as factually true and really I don't thing that Ziggy should be let off that easily. I'm hoping that ziggy will come forward and apologise for the way he dealt with this or already has done in private with Chanelle. I didn't pick up until yesterday that he dumped her early afternoon by phone and then went straight to an interview, which must have been prearranged. That phone call in the interview was probably her trying to get hold of him as he'd said for her to call him later. Very strange, as he'd spent two days with her and told her he loved her. Does question what went on that week though?

They also supported her reasons given and how it was protrayed as well. And also how it was out of the blue. For someone trying to set him up, she was certainly desperate to convince him she loved him. Felt so sorry for her when she said. Love you always, always, always!
[List][*]Admin Edit: This thread is continued here: zig&chan appreciation thread[/List]