Originally Posted by CARA2000:
“Chan's Birthday party Beluga Lounge, Wakefield.
”
“Chan's Birthday party Beluga Lounge, Wakefield.
”
Have been on the website, sounds just Chan's cup of tea. RandB music. Wonder if any of the London lot will go?
zig&chan appreciation thread (Part 6)
54 of 300
Have been on the website, sounds just Chan's cup of tea. RandB music. Wonder if any of the London lot will go?
Originally Posted by CARA2000:
“Have been on the website, sounds just Chan's cup of tea. RandB music. Wonder if any of the London lot will go?”
“Have been on the website, sounds just Chan's cup of tea. RandB music. Wonder if any of the London lot will go?
”
Don't know, she must of had this booked for quite a while, seems like a swanky place.
I thought it might be in Wakefield, too many friends and family etc to cart down to London.
Originally Posted by CARA2000:
“Chan's Birthday party Beluga Lounge, Wakefield.”
“Chan's Birthday party Beluga Lounge, Wakefield.
”
Beat me to it I just saw this on my myspace. So not in London then
Originally Posted by Wissy:
“Beat me to it I just saw this on my myspace. So not in London then”
“Beat me to it I just saw this on my myspace. So not in London then”
I think this is a sensible venue for Chanelle. Let them come to you is what I say. Family and friends more important. Wow! I wish I was going. Sounds like my cup of tea also.
Originally Posted by CARA2000:
“I think this is a sensible venue for Chanelle. Let them come to you is what I say. Family and friends more important. Wow! I wish I was going. Sounds like my cup of tea also.”
“I think this is a sensible venue for Chanelle. Let them come to you is what I say. Family and friends more important. Wow! I wish I was going. Sounds like my cup of tea also.
”
I agree - probably get a nicer class of clientele, and all her local friends can go and enjoy themselves
Sorry you may hate me for this, but I have a funny feeling would Chan put up a message on her myspeace page, saying were her party is when there is mad person out there trying to get to her, I know I wouldn't put up where the party is going to hold.
I'm going to take this news with a pinch of salt
Last edited by quin13 : 07-11-2007 at 10:40
I'm going to take this news with a pinch of salt
Last edited by quin13 : 07-11-2007 at 10:40
I'm happy she's decided to have the party at home, and think this is probably the reason for her long weekend there.
I would have thought the security on the door will be very tight so won't be too much risk of anyone getting in who isn't invited!
I would have thought the security on the door will be very tight so won't be too much risk of anyone getting in who isn't invited!
Originally Posted by quin13:
“Sorry you may hate me for this, but I have a funny feeling would Chan put up a message on her myspeace page, saying were her party is when there is mad person out there trying to get to her, I know I wouldn't put up where the party is going to hold.
I'm going to take this news with a pinch of salt”
“Sorry you may hate me for this, but I have a funny feeling would Chan put up a message on her myspeace page, saying were her party is when there is mad person out there trying to get to her, I know I wouldn't put up where the party is going to hold.
I'm going to take this news with a pinch of salt”
I think the stalker stuff is exagerated by the press tbh.
Wherever her party was being held she would have had to book it weeks ago. I was wondering how a London venue would work given all her family and close friends live in or near to Wakefield.
She's excited, so that's cool.
Originally Posted by kaz1:
“I think the stalker stuff is exagerated by the press tbh.
Wherever her party was being held she would have had to book it weeks ago. I was wondering how a London venue would work given all her family and close friends live in or near to Wakefield.
She's excited, so that's cool.”
“I think the stalker stuff is exagerated by the press tbh.
Wherever her party was being held she would have had to book it weeks ago. I was wondering how a London venue would work given all her family and close friends live in or near to Wakefield.
She's excited, so that's cool.”
There are probably less stalkers up there than there are 'unsuitables' in London, and security will know what he/they look like I'd imagine - I'm sure that aspect will have been covered thoroughly
If she's excited and that's how she wants it, good luck to her
Originally Posted by kaz1:
“I think the stalker stuff is exagerated by the press tbh.
Wherever her party was being held she would have had to book it weeks ago. I was wondering how a London venue would work given all her family and close friends live in or near to Wakefield.
She's excited, so that's cool.”
“I think the stalker stuff is exagerated by the press tbh.
Wherever her party was being held she would have had to book it weeks ago. I was wondering how a London venue would work given all her family and close friends live in or near to Wakefield.
She's excited, so that's cool.”
I know what you mean, but letting everone know where it is dose not feel quite right, I just have this feeling about I hate having these feeling
normal something happens when I have these feelings.I know I'm puting a downer on good news but I'm happy she is excited
Sorry for this rant.
I wonder if Ziggy is going to the party then, because if he is attending the charity football match i doubt he will have time to get upto Wakefield.
Originally Posted by banana1:
“I wonder if Ziggy is going to the party then, because if he is attending the charity football match i doubt he will have time to get upto Wakefield.”
“I wonder if Ziggy is going to the party then, because if he is attending the charity football match i doubt he will have time to get upto Wakefield.
”
Does Chan say which night the party is happening?
Originally Posted by banana1:
“I wonder if Ziggy is going to the party then, because if he is attending the charity football match i doubt he will have time to get upto Wakefield.”
“I wonder if Ziggy is going to the party then, because if he is attending the charity football match i doubt he will have time to get upto Wakefield.
”
He might have cancelled but the sites may not have been updated, like what happened with the James Whale football match & a nightclub pa when he was in Dubai
Originally Posted by JoJo4:
“Does Chan say which night the party is happening?”
“Does Chan say which night the party is happening?”
No she dose not say which night the party is going to be on.
Originally Posted by banana1:
“I wonder if Ziggy is going to the party then, because if he is attending the charity football match i doubt he will have time to get upto Wakefield.”
“I wonder if Ziggy is going to the party then, because if he is attending the charity football match i doubt he will have time to get upto Wakefield.
”
Don't know. There must be a few from London that she may have invited.
But this would have been booked for a while so anyone that she did want to come from London would have time to change the schedules if need be.
Venues like that can't just cater for you at short notice.
Jo Jo I think the party is on the 10th, a couple of her friends mentioned it a few weeks ago.
Bullentin from Chan
7 Nov 2007 10:49
Quick Update!!
Hey there ladies and gents!!
Just a quick bulletin to let you know things are great and I've been busy busy busy!!
Calendar is out and doing well, thanks for you support!!
Got some signings over the next week at different locations in UK.
Perfume is out sometime within the next 10-14 days but not confirmed exact date yet!!
Filming for Wannabe is going really good.....erm......what else?!
Think that's it!!
I'm allowed Saturday and Sunday off for my birthday!! WOOHOO!!
mwah,
Chanelle xx
7 Nov 2007 10:49
Quick Update!!
Hey there ladies and gents!!
Just a quick bulletin to let you know things are great and I've been busy busy busy!!
Calendar is out and doing well, thanks for you support!!
Got some signings over the next week at different locations in UK.
Perfume is out sometime within the next 10-14 days but not confirmed exact date yet!!
Filming for Wannabe is going really good.....erm......what else?!
Think that's it!!
I'm allowed Saturday and Sunday off for my birthday!! WOOHOO!!
mwah,
Chanelle xx
Originally Posted by banana1:
“I wonder if Ziggy is going to the party then, because if he is attending the charity football match i doubt he will have time to get upto Wakefield.”
“I wonder if Ziggy is going to the party then, because if he is attending the charity football match i doubt he will have time to get upto Wakefield.
”
YOu will probaly find he will go to chanelles party, over other stuff.I dont think he is that shallow.
Hi all.
Been dowin in South California for a few days (no , not looking for VB - we were visiting the brother's girlfriend's sister & her family; they could see the recent fires from the house, but thankfully never quite reached them). I did manage to do a bit of lurking, but stayed away for the last couple of days.
Since I was on last, a lot of sense has been talked, and many excellent posts (not to single out any, but No. 37764 [Mersey_Rules] and 38740 [Polly501] were great.
I could probably comment for pages, but here's a few thoughts.
Charley article - haven't see it in full, but far from Chan "seething with rage", I think it's more likely (after she picks herself up after her laughing fit) that she'd view it as hopefully another jealous story-teller off her case. Probably little truth to the article anyway - more a dig at Charl than Chanelle.
There was a view (not here, I know) that some recent pics had been staged. I think what is happening is the anti-lobby haven't any bad stuff to rant about, so they attack the good stuff (the media have been doing this with pics already).
Re. Nuts, I couldn't access the video. The interview I thought fine; the pics, while I can see why there was criticism, they didn't really show much more than we saw in the House; even her bum we virtually saw when she wore that thong. I don't see these in a lustful way, but as beautiful shots of a gorgeous and sexy lady. And they put paid to that stupid rigged photo of her saggy bum in the fairy outfit.
Going back to Zig in Star mag, I think he might have been stitched up a bit there; could only ever really trust OK (and maybe Heat) - the others do anything they like.
Re. the Jordan article, I think she comes across very badly; I don't want to hear slagging off and jealousy (Z&C only make negative comments about others ocasionally, and then only as a response).
There was some criticism of their management, but they can't get it 100% right all the time, and different supporters want different things. They're also being misquoted. Z&C have c. 3m quid to date, so they can't be doing that badly for them.
If Zig isn't at Chan's party, I'll be very surprised - can't see any reason he wouldn't be there. Hope we hear something from them that day, but if they want to keep it private and avoid any media crap I can understand that.
Every time a split or break-up is mentioned, I ask myself that question, and every time I come up with a load of reasons why it doesn't make sense. I can't see it happening, even with all the pressure they've been under recently. I'll be the first to admit was wrong if it does happen.
DG
Been dowin in South California for a few days (no , not looking for VB - we were visiting the brother's girlfriend's sister & her family; they could see the recent fires from the house, but thankfully never quite reached them). I did manage to do a bit of lurking, but stayed away for the last couple of days.
Since I was on last, a lot of sense has been talked, and many excellent posts (not to single out any, but No. 37764 [Mersey_Rules] and 38740 [Polly501] were great.
I could probably comment for pages, but here's a few thoughts.
Charley article - haven't see it in full, but far from Chan "seething with rage", I think it's more likely (after she picks herself up after her laughing fit) that she'd view it as hopefully another jealous story-teller off her case. Probably little truth to the article anyway - more a dig at Charl than Chanelle.
There was a view (not here, I know) that some recent pics had been staged. I think what is happening is the anti-lobby haven't any bad stuff to rant about, so they attack the good stuff (the media have been doing this with pics already).
Re. Nuts, I couldn't access the video. The interview I thought fine; the pics, while I can see why there was criticism, they didn't really show much more than we saw in the House; even her bum we virtually saw when she wore that thong. I don't see these in a lustful way, but as beautiful shots of a gorgeous and sexy lady. And they put paid to that stupid rigged photo of her saggy bum in the fairy outfit.
Going back to Zig in Star mag, I think he might have been stitched up a bit there; could only ever really trust OK (and maybe Heat) - the others do anything they like.
Re. the Jordan article, I think she comes across very badly; I don't want to hear slagging off and jealousy (Z&C only make negative comments about others ocasionally, and then only as a response).
There was some criticism of their management, but they can't get it 100% right all the time, and different supporters want different things. They're also being misquoted. Z&C have c. 3m quid to date, so they can't be doing that badly for them.
If Zig isn't at Chan's party, I'll be very surprised - can't see any reason he wouldn't be there. Hope we hear something from them that day, but if they want to keep it private and avoid any media crap I can understand that.
Every time a split or break-up is mentioned, I ask myself that question, and every time I come up with a load of reasons why it doesn't make sense. I can't see it happening, even with all the pressure they've been under recently. I'll be the first to admit was wrong if it does happen.
DG
Originally Posted by CARA2000:
“Chan's Birthday party Beluga Lounge, Wakefield.”
“Chan's Birthday party Beluga Lounge, Wakefield.
”
when my friend had a party there topless waiters and g strings with apron on of course very stylish
Originally Posted by janpox:
“when my friend had a party there topless waiters and g strings with apron on of course very stylish”
“when my friend had a party there topless waiters and g strings with apron on of course very stylish”
I suppose it depends on what type of party you want.
I can just imagine Chan sitting with her Mum, Dad & Granny being served by topless waiters.
http://www.belugalounge.com/
Originally Posted by dubguy:
“Hi all.
Been dowin in South California for a few days (no , not looking for VB - we were visiting the brother's girlfriend's sister & her family; they could see the recent fires from the house, but thankfully never quite reached them). I did manage to do a bit of lurking, but stayed away for the last couple of days.
Since I was on last, a lot of sense has been talked, and many excellent posts (not to single out any, but No. 37764 [Mersey_Rules] and 38740 [Polly501] were great.
I could probably comment for pages, but here's a few thoughts.
Charley article - haven't see it in full, but far from Chan "seething with rage", I think it's more likely (after she picks herself up after her laughing fit) that she'd view it as hopefully another jealous story-teller off her case. Probably little truth to the article anyway - more a dig at Charl than Chanelle.
There was a view (not here, I know) that some recent pics had been staged. I think what is happening is the anti-lobby haven't any bad stuff to rant about, so they attack the good stuff (the media have been doing this with pics already).
Re. Nuts, I couldn't access the video. The interview I thought fine; the pics, while I can see why there was criticism, they didn't really show much more than we saw in the House; even her bum we virtually saw when she wore that thong. I don't see these in a lustful way, but as beautiful shots of a gorgeous and sexy lady. And they put paid to that stupid rigged photo of her saggy bum in the fairy outfit.
Going back to Zig in Star mag, I think he might have been stitched up a bit there; could only ever really trust OK (and maybe Heat) - the others do anything they like.
Re. the Jordan article, I think she comes across very badly; I don't want to hear slagging off and jealousy (Z&C only make negative comments about others ocasionally, and then only as a response).
There was some criticism of their management, but they can't get it 100% right all the time, and different supporters want different things. They're also being misquoted. Z&C have c. 3m quid to date, so they can't be doing that badly for them.
If Zig isn't at Chan's party, I'll be very surprised - can't see any reason he wouldn't be there. Hope we hear something from them that day, but if they want to keep it private and avoid any media crap I can understand that.
Every time a split or break-up is mentioned, I ask myself that question, and every time I come up with a load of reasons why it doesn't make sense. I can't see it happening, even with all the pressure they've been under recently. I'll be the first to admit was wrong if it does happen.
DG”
“Hi all.
Been dowin in South California for a few days (no , not looking for VB - we were visiting the brother's girlfriend's sister & her family; they could see the recent fires from the house, but thankfully never quite reached them). I did manage to do a bit of lurking, but stayed away for the last couple of days.
Since I was on last, a lot of sense has been talked, and many excellent posts (not to single out any, but No. 37764 [Mersey_Rules] and 38740 [Polly501] were great.
I could probably comment for pages, but here's a few thoughts.
Charley article - haven't see it in full, but far from Chan "seething with rage", I think it's more likely (after she picks herself up after her laughing fit) that she'd view it as hopefully another jealous story-teller off her case. Probably little truth to the article anyway - more a dig at Charl than Chanelle.
There was a view (not here, I know) that some recent pics had been staged. I think what is happening is the anti-lobby haven't any bad stuff to rant about, so they attack the good stuff (the media have been doing this with pics already).
Re. Nuts, I couldn't access the video. The interview I thought fine; the pics, while I can see why there was criticism, they didn't really show much more than we saw in the House; even her bum we virtually saw when she wore that thong. I don't see these in a lustful way, but as beautiful shots of a gorgeous and sexy lady. And they put paid to that stupid rigged photo of her saggy bum in the fairy outfit.
Going back to Zig in Star mag, I think he might have been stitched up a bit there; could only ever really trust OK (and maybe Heat) - the others do anything they like.
Re. the Jordan article, I think she comes across very badly; I don't want to hear slagging off and jealousy (Z&C only make negative comments about others ocasionally, and then only as a response).
There was some criticism of their management, but they can't get it 100% right all the time, and different supporters want different things. They're also being misquoted. Z&C have c. 3m quid to date, so they can't be doing that badly for them.
If Zig isn't at Chan's party, I'll be very surprised - can't see any reason he wouldn't be there. Hope we hear something from them that day, but if they want to keep it private and avoid any media crap I can understand that.
Every time a split or break-up is mentioned, I ask myself that question, and every time I come up with a load of reasons why it doesn't make sense. I can't see it happening, even with all the pressure they've been under recently. I'll be the first to admit was wrong if it does happen.
DG”
Welcome back hope you had a nice time in California, great post by the way
Right I'm going to be out for a hour will speak to you all when I get back in
Originally Posted by dubguy:
“Hi all.
Been dowin in South California for a few days (no , not looking for VB - we were visiting the brother's girlfriend's sister & her family; they could see the recent fires from the house, but thankfully never quite reached them). I did manage to do a bit of lurking, but stayed away for the last couple of days.
Since I was on last, a lot of sense has been talked, and many excellent posts (not to single out any, but No. 37764 [Mersey_Rules] and 38740 [Polly501] were great.
I could probably comment for pages, but here's a few thoughts.
Charley article - haven't see it in full, but far from Chan "seething with rage", I think it's more likely (after she picks herself up after her laughing fit) that she'd view it as hopefully another jealous story-teller off her case. Probably little truth to the article anyway - more a dig at Charl than Chanelle.
There was a view (not here, I know) that some recent pics had been staged. I think what is happening is the anti-lobby haven't any bad stuff to rant about, so they attack the good stuff (the media have been doing this with pics already).
Re. Nuts, I couldn't access the video. The interview I thought fine; the pics, while I can see why there was criticism, they didn't really show much more than we saw in the House; even her bum we virtually saw when she wore that thong. I don't see these in a lustful way, but as beautiful shots of a gorgeous and sexy lady. And they put paid to that stupid rigged photo of her saggy bum in the fairy outfit.
Going back to Zig in Star mag, I think he might have been stitched up a bit there; could only ever really trust OK (and maybe Heat) - the others do anything they like.
Re. the Jordan article, I think she comes across very badly; I don't want to hear slagging off and jealousy (Z&C only make negative comments about others ocasionally, and then only as a response).
There was some criticism of their management, but they can't get it 100% right all the time, and different supporters want different things. They're also being misquoted. Z&C have c. 3m quid to date, so they can't be doing that badly for them.
If Zig isn't at Chan's party, I'll be very surprised - can't see any reason he wouldn't be there. Hope we hear something from them that day, but if they want to keep it private and avoid any media crap I can understand that.
Every time a split or break-up is mentioned, I ask myself that question, and every time I come up with a load of reasons why it doesn't make sense. I can't see it happening, even with all the pressure they've been under recently. I'll be the first to admit was wrong if it does happen.
DG”
“Hi all.
Been dowin in South California for a few days (no , not looking for VB - we were visiting the brother's girlfriend's sister & her family; they could see the recent fires from the house, but thankfully never quite reached them). I did manage to do a bit of lurking, but stayed away for the last couple of days.
Since I was on last, a lot of sense has been talked, and many excellent posts (not to single out any, but No. 37764 [Mersey_Rules] and 38740 [Polly501] were great.
I could probably comment for pages, but here's a few thoughts.
Charley article - haven't see it in full, but far from Chan "seething with rage", I think it's more likely (after she picks herself up after her laughing fit) that she'd view it as hopefully another jealous story-teller off her case. Probably little truth to the article anyway - more a dig at Charl than Chanelle.
There was a view (not here, I know) that some recent pics had been staged. I think what is happening is the anti-lobby haven't any bad stuff to rant about, so they attack the good stuff (the media have been doing this with pics already).
Re. Nuts, I couldn't access the video. The interview I thought fine; the pics, while I can see why there was criticism, they didn't really show much more than we saw in the House; even her bum we virtually saw when she wore that thong. I don't see these in a lustful way, but as beautiful shots of a gorgeous and sexy lady. And they put paid to that stupid rigged photo of her saggy bum in the fairy outfit.
Going back to Zig in Star mag, I think he might have been stitched up a bit there; could only ever really trust OK (and maybe Heat) - the others do anything they like.
Re. the Jordan article, I think she comes across very badly; I don't want to hear slagging off and jealousy (Z&C only make negative comments about others ocasionally, and then only as a response).
There was some criticism of their management, but they can't get it 100% right all the time, and different supporters want different things. They're also being misquoted. Z&C have c. 3m quid to date, so they can't be doing that badly for them.
If Zig isn't at Chan's party, I'll be very surprised - can't see any reason he wouldn't be there. Hope we hear something from them that day, but if they want to keep it private and avoid any media crap I can understand that.
Every time a split or break-up is mentioned, I ask myself that question, and every time I come up with a load of reasons why it doesn't make sense. I can't see it happening, even with all the pressure they've been under recently. I'll be the first to admit was wrong if it does happen.
DG”
hi hope you had a nice time grate post i couldnt agree more
ypu know i had to laught at the daily stirer the other day about charley being chucked out of a nightclub in tenneriffe or whereever she went to and in this weeks mags they have her wearing a neck brace how the drs have told her she has to wear it well my missus is a nurse and the neckbrace she is wearing is about 5 years out of date lol nso as for the charly ryan atkinson link i really do think its bull i honestly cant beleive a word she says lol and i hope chan hasnt forgot my invite to her party lol and ime glad to hear the latest heat rumour about charley appearing in in bad girls has gone down the pan yipee
Do you know what guys I am not analysing if Ziggy is going to turn up at his own GF'S party...
He's her boyfriend and does anyone really expect him to not accompany her
I don't understand how any of us can doubt that..
IMO He will not miss her party.
But the underlining is Chanelle sounds Happy and says things are Great.. What more do any of us need to know..
I think that is great news !!!
Now please can we all relax - me included - and just look forward to seeing some great pictures ....
He's her boyfriend and does anyone really expect him to not accompany her
I don't understand how any of us can doubt that..
IMO He will not miss her party.
But the underlining is Chanelle sounds Happy and says things are Great.. What more do any of us need to know..
I think that is great news !!!
Now please can we all relax - me included - and just look forward to seeing some great pictures ....
Strangely enough Im not expecting Zig to go to her party. Its her night etc so I think he will want all attention on her and being a famous face in Wakefield may take some of that away for her tbh.
I imagine a romantic dinner for two somewhere quiet etc etc just for them and him not attending her party. Two special nights for a special lady.
I imagine a romantic dinner for two somewhere quiet etc etc just for them and him not attending her party. Two special nights for a special lady.
54 of 300
